Re: D-Link DNS-323 support dropped in Debian stretch

2018-03-28 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 21:25 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 07:36:26PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > > There's one possibility that can bring back qnap, or even D-Link > > DNS device: > > - create a new flavour for armel, such as armel-none-mini > > - the new flavour

Re: D-Link DNS-323 support dropped in Debian stretch

2018-03-28 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 21:25 +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 07:36:26PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> > There's one possibility that can bring back qnap, or even D-Link >> > DNS device: >> > -

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

2018-03-28 Thread Federico Pietro Briata
Hello guys, I believe the problem we are facing on Kirkwood with stretch is the same I had with iop32 and other folks with ixp4xx. As the support for iop32 on Wheezy is under EOL, do we have any hopes to solve the kernel size issue common for all this architectures or it's time to replace our nas?

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

2018-03-28 Thread Rick Thomas
On Mar 27, 2018, at 2:08 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: > On 2018-03-27 17:29, Rick Thomas wrote: >> On Mar 27, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Rogério Brito wrote: >>> As a related subject, I could compile a more stripped down version of >>> the armel kernel, put it for