Re: Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

Hi Yaroslav, On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:24:42AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Neurodebian already offers a bootable image, and a default virtual > > machine -- so you already *have* some idea of a default installation. > > we had some live cd attempt in the past but didn't push it

Processed: Re: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:blends Bug #758116 [tasksel] tasksel: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough Bug reassigned from package 'tasksel' to 'src:blends'. No longer marked as found in versions

Re: [Neurodebian-devel] Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

Hi Michael and Yaroslav, and all Just making the mails a bit shorter... :-) On 06.04.2016 15:49, Michael Hanke wrote: > Yes, you got it right. Debian science is the reference. Anybody who cares > should rightfully feel responsible. > [...] > No we don't generate the tasks from tags, the tags a

Re: [Neurodebian-devel] Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

Hey, On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 06.04.2016 14:36, Michael Hanke wrote: > >> Some Fields in neurodebian seem not to have 1:1 tasks in > >> debian-science: [...] > > Any discrepancy should be in favor of the non-neurodebian tasks,

Re: [Neurodebian-devel] Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

Hi Michael, On 06.04.2016 14:36, Michael Hanke wrote: >> Some Fields in neurodebian seem not to have 1:1 tasks in >> debian-science: [...] > Any discrepancy should be in favor of the non-neurodebian tasks, > everything else is an ommision/bug in our side. >> The debian-science task

Re: Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

quick clarification for now, hopefully would find time for more later) On Wed, 06 Apr 2016, Ole Streicher wrote: > > Are you aiming to provide that level of granularity within debian > > installer? if so -- that would be cool. > Sure, I am also unstatisfied with the current state. There is

Re: [Neurodebian-devel] Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

Hi, advance sorry for a terse reply ... resource issues... On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Dear Yaroslav, and all, > > I am currently looking on how we get the Debian Blends into the > installer for the next release. This is connected to Bug #758116

Re: Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

Andreas Tille writes: > And by the way: We should develop bootable images and default virtual > machines based on the Blends tasks. If Neurodebian would finally agree > to this we might get more manpower to implement this. (I wonder how > often I mentioned that we should join

Re: Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:05:56AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > I think that both is useful. Sure, there are many users who want to have > a detailed list of choices and do an educated selection. > > However, there are also reasons for a "simple" way: if one has no glue > where to start with,

Re: Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

Yaroslav Halchenko writes: > Would any user ever want that particular selection of Recommended > packages? may be, but I see that most often users would want a > particular selection from those pointed by Suggests and Recommends. I think that both is useful. Sure,