Blends websites [Was: Re: Blend Homepage Debian Edu]

2019-04-10 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 11:39:01AM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > The config file used by jekyll: www-src/_config.yml I've now changed the jekyll config file, now a sandbox directory is used as target instead of the www/ folder. It's one step more if the build envirenment is used, O

Re: Blend Homepage Debian Edu

2019-04-08 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
Hi Andreas, On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:13:41AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I have no idea what `jekyll build` is doing. I never touched jekyll > (neither in this context or somewhere else) so probably somebody else > has added that feature and the mailing list is the place to discuss > this.

Re: Bug#903593: python3-blends: shouldn't write Packages: list in case the udeb option is set

2018-07-12 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:09:24PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > far as I looked into, the test calles > > /usr/share/debian-edu-config/tools/debian-edu-bless > > and this script seems to be unable to handle alternatives. The script 'debian-edu-bless' uses tasksel to install packages, so

Re: Bug#903593: python3-blends: shouldn't write Packages: list in case the udeb option is set

2018-07-12 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 08:45:46AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > Wolfgang Schweer writes: > > Generated with blends-dev 0.7.1 the list contains tftpd-hpa as well. As > > both packages conflict, the installation breaks, see: > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testi

Re: Bug#903593: python3-blends: shouldn't write Packages: list in case the udeb option is set

2018-07-11 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
Hi Ole, On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:41:05PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > However, I am not sure about the required format to udeb .desc files. As > you describe it, the situation is: > > * the Package: field is not needed for udebs > * but if it is there and contains alternatives, the

Bug#903593: python3-blends: shouldn't write Packages: list in case the udeb option is set

2018-07-11 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
Package: python3-blends Version: 0.7.1 Severity: wishlist Hi, while testing Debian Edu I noticed that installations fail due to an incorrect debian-edu-tasks.desc file. The Packages: list now contains all alternative packages instead of only the first one, e.g. tftpd-hpa | atftpd lists both

Re: Processing of blends_0.7.0_amd64.changes

2018-04-14 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 07:01:43PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > blends_0.7.0_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost As far as I can tell, this blends-dev version seems to work out of the box for Debian Edu. Running 'make dist': [..] /usr/share/blends-dev/blend-gen-control -r

Re: New feature for 0.6.103

2018-04-10 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:30:07AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > BTW, are you happy with the UDD support? IMO blends-dev should depend on python3-psycopg2 because otherwise the '-U' flag doesn't seem to work... Wolfgang P.S. I can confirm that own sources.list.* take precedence like expected,

Re: New feature for 0.6.103

2018-04-09 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 02:02:12PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > since there seem to be no problems with the current 0.6.103 release, I > would rename it to 0.7.0 and upload to unstable. Any doubts? It would be nice to have this: ---8> Wolfgang Schweer <w.schw...@gmx.de> writes: &

Re: Accepted blends 0.6.102 (source) into experimental

2018-03-28 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
Hi Ole, On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 07:19:39AM +, Ole Streicher wrote: > blends (0.6.102) experimental; urgency=low The issues in version 0.6.101 seem to be fixed. One other issue: Debian Edu has own sources.list.* files. These used to take precedence over those with the same name found in

Re: Bug#891188: blends-dev: created d/control recommends packages not in main

2018-03-26 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
Hi Ole, On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:28:32PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > I just uploaded 0.6.101 to experimental (code is in the "experimental > branch); could everyone please have a look. UDD is not implemented yet. [..] > Debian Astro and Debian Edu (both without the Depends->Recommends >

Re: Bug#891188: blends-dev: created d/control recommends packages not in main

2018-03-16 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I've commited a fix to Git which for me creates now sensible Debian > Astro metapackages. I've checked how this fix would concern Debian Edu: (1) The Debian Edu Makefile has to be adjusted: s/GENCONTROL_DEPENDS =

Re: Bug#883297: "Packages: list" field removed from tasksel control file

2018-01-16 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:50:17PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > But, with the exception of the existing (with unexplicable content) > debian-med-tasks.desc file, things are IMO fine. One more thing: I ran 'git log --follow debian-med-tasks.desc' debian-med-tasks.desc with 'Packages

Re: Bug#883297: "Packages: list" field removed from tasksel control file

2018-01-16 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
Hi Andreas, On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:06:26PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:46:34PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > > > > After having cloned the debian-med repo: > > The generated debian-med-tasks.desc file seems to be ok. Further, the &

Re: Bug#883297: "Packages: list" field removed from tasksel control file

2018-01-16 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 04:12:48PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > H, may be we should not ask how it looked before but rather what > should be the content of the tasksel file we *want* to create. After having cloned the debian-med repo: The generated debian-med-tasks.desc file seems to be ok.

Re: Bug#883297: "Packages: list" field removed from tasksel control file

2018-01-16 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
Hi Andreas, On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 09:44:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 08:05:56PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > > I have looked at the blend-gen-control script. The passages you are missing > > are if'ed out by > > > > ``` > > if ($opts{'u'}) { > > > > ... > >

Re: Bug#840094: blends-dev: Does not recognize multiline dependencies

2016-11-24 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:39:54PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Andreas Tille] > > I just want to hear confirmation from some Debian Edu developer > > whether the upload of blends-dev 0.6.95 is OK. > > As far as I can tell, these changes are intended and reflect changes > done to the

Bug#835528: blends-dev: please support option for udeb using blends

2016-08-26 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
Package: blends-dev Version: 0.6.93 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: debian-edu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org Hi, while testing Debian Edu Stretch I noticed that the tasks desc file generated by blend-gen-control doesn't work with the

Re: Bug#758116: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough

2016-05-17 Thread Wolfgang Schweer
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:52:32AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > On 17.05.2016 02:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I'm not sure how reasonable it is to have such a long list of meta > > packages in the installer. See attached tasksel-gtk-greyscale.png for > > the initial display with the graphical