Re: [Neurodebian-devel] Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

2016-04-06 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi Michael and Yaroslav, and all Just making the mails a bit shorter... :-) On 06.04.2016 15:49, Michael Hanke wrote: > Yes, you got it right. Debian science is the reference. Anybody who cares > should rightfully feel responsible. > [...] > No we don't generate the tasks from tags, the tags a

Re: [Neurodebian-devel] Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

2016-04-06 Thread Michael Hanke
Hey, On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 06.04.2016 14:36, Michael Hanke wrote: > >> Some Fields in neurodebian seem not to have 1:1 tasks in > >> debian-science: [...] > > Any discrepancy should be in favor of the non-neurodebian tasks,

Re: [Neurodebian-devel] Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

2016-04-06 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi Michael, On 06.04.2016 14:36, Michael Hanke wrote: >> Some Fields in neurodebian seem not to have 1:1 tasks in >> debian-science: [...] > Any discrepancy should be in favor of the non-neurodebian tasks, > everything else is an ommision/bug in our side. >> The debian-science task

Re: [Neurodebian-devel] Neurodebian tasks (and Debian Science)

2016-04-06 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, advance sorry for a terse reply ... resource issues... On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Dear Yaroslav, and all, > > I am currently looking on how we get the Debian Blends into the > installer for the next release. This is connected to Bug #758116