* interactivity -- "please insert the 5th base-system floppy"
I was hoping debootstrap would be able to do its job without any interaction.
As currently written we can't handle interactivity, though I could change that
if it is desired. We aren't supporting base system on
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 08:00:49PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
It seems like boot-floppies should depend on sudo - I think it's just
a small addition in debian/control, to the depends line, but until I
get up to speed on boot-floppies, I prefer to
Repository: boot-floppies/debian
who:aph
time: Thu Apr 12 23:48:43 PDT 2001
Log Message:
remove redundant suggests on python-xml; add recommends for 'sudo',
which can be set in 'config' as cmd to achieve root
Files:
changed:control
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Repository: boot-floppies/debian
who:aph
time: Thu Apr 12 23:49:20 PDT 2001
Log Message:
changes for me and Paul J.Y. Lahaie -- people, it's better if you do
your own debian/changelog entries please
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We currently don't have any way of installing woody over ppp. Is this something
we want to include? ppp support will be fairly large, so maybe we would want to
include it on a separate disk?
I don't really care one way or the other... Is there a
I don't mind the concept of adding more to the root filesystem, but
the problem is you have to deal right now with the fact that any room
we have now we're going to need for the fonts and message catalogs of
i18n floppies.
Plus other arches often don't have that much space available, esp 64
bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a patch to make/checks to correctly check for a msdos module on a 2.4
system.
Index: make/checks
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/make/checks,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -u
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It does give the user a choice, between the MBR of the first drive
on the boot partition bus (e.g., hda or sda) and the boot
partition (e.g., hda1 in my case). The description, however, is
inaccurate, in that it refers to the "root partition's boot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I couldn't find debootstrap in either unstable or woody, so I built the deb by
hand. The following patch will fix the Makefile, letting debootstrap build. I
sent it to AJ, so hopefully we'll see deboostrap showing up for ppc.
Excellent.
Bugs that are preventing us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm. My patch to common.sh which fixes a conflict with apt-get preferences was
screwy. Here's what it should have been. Sorry.
Um, before I apply this, two questions:
why do you need the preferences? What features does it afford the
boot-floppies builder?
how
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:53:33AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
No, that's not the problem. The problem is that is wants to be be
passed the cd mount point dir, other other archive top level, not a
directory deep in the archive. I've fixed that in
Repository: boot-floppies
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 00:10:49 PDT 2001
Log Message:
sometihg is done!
Files:
changed:todo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repository: boot-floppies/make
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 00:11:23 PDT 2001
Log Message:
patch for 2.4 compat from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Files:
changed:checks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:54:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
I don't mind the concept of adding more to the root filesystem, but
the problem is you have to deal right now with the fact that any room
we have now we're going to need for the fonts and message catalogs of
i18n floppies.
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is debian-installer going to do this the same way? copying the kernel
from the `rescue' disk if thats what it still ends be up being called.
I doubt it -- they use .udebs for this kinda stuff I bet.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL
Andrew Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The answer is another question, how wide spread do we want the use
of Debian to be? In FreeBSD, it works quite well, and there is no
reason it can't work this way on Debian: you enter your network
settings, it goes off and tries to get the packages, it
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Andrew Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The answer is another question, how wide spread do we want the use
of Debian to be? In FreeBSD, it works quite well, and there is no
reason it can't work this way on Debian: you enter your network
settings, it goes off and
Repository: boot-floppies/documentation/pt
who:gleydson
time: Fri Apr 13 04:36:35 PDT 2001
Log Message:
sync with english version
Files:
changed:dbootstrap.sgml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a patch to make/checks to correctly check for a
msdos module on a 2.4
system.
I had to apply this manually.
What are you using from CVS? You should be using the HEAD --- do
'cvs -q up -d -P -A' to be sure.
Note -- we are *not* planning on using 2.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm. My patch to common.sh which fixes a conflict with
apt-get preferences was
screwy. Here's what it should have been. Sorry.
Um, before I apply this, two questions:
why do you need the preferences? What features does it
afford the
boot-floppies builder?
I
Be careful, Stephen. This list in keymaps.sh is sync'd
with a list in dbootstrap.
Interestingly, dbootstrap/kbdconfig.c already has this commented out for PPC,
but not for m68k. Should I send a patch to comment it out in keymaps.sh and for
m68k?
It also occurs in dbootstrap/langs/german.src,
Thierry Laronde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, I, as a french native speaker, do not consider that Debian has to try
to put all the message catalogs for all the languages in floppies. It would
be enough to have floppies with i18n abilities and room for "C" and _one_
other language. It would
David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We've supported the base system on floppies up until potato; I'd like
to continue it.
I think it should be optional.
sounds good, I'll work on interfacing with that, probably I'll be able to this
weekend. Maybe look into splitting up the bases
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmmm. My patch to common.sh which fixes a conflict with
apt-get preferences was
screwy. Here's what it should have been. Sorry.
Um, before I apply this, two questions:
why do you need the preferences? What features does it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interestingly, dbootstrap/kbdconfig.c already has this commented out for PPC,
but not for m68k. Should I send a patch to comment it out in keymaps.sh and for
m68k?
Sure. It should be in sync.
It also occurs in dbootstrap/langs/german.src, but I'm not really sure
Repository: boot-floppies
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 07:12:48 PDT 2001
Log Message:
enable an environment variable APT_PREFS or a local config file
preferences.apt for apt configuration; based on a patch from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Files:
changed:common.sh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I have tested debian-installer last 5 days and I have severals
questions:
1) Why do I need to put modutils-basic_2.4.1-2_i386.udeb in
build/localudebs/
( http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/debian-installer )
modutils-basic.udeb is in directory udebs/ (downloaded during make)
2) Even if
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/libfdisk
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 07:15:59 PDT 2001
Log Message:
a hack for building using kernel 2.4 from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Files:
changed:partbl_msdos.c
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Repository: boot-floppies/debian
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 07:20:46 PDT 2001
Log Message:
changes from Stephen R. Marenka
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:57:02AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Thierry Laronde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, I, as a french native speaker, do not consider that Debian has to try
to put all the message catalogs for all the languages in floppies. It would
be enough to have floppies with
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:03:48AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Woah, uh, if we do that, does that mean we have to ship those split
images as part of boot-floppies? God, I hope not.
Nah, I figure we just write a script that lets people generate them
from the mirrors or their CD. Hmmm. Or maybe
FWIW, on the 10th of april has been released a version of Busybox including
a 22k vi. Perhaps, in the future, the end of the small editors wars ;)
--
Thierry LARONDE, Centre de Ressources Informatiques, Archamps - France
http://www.cri74.org
PingOO, serveur de com sur distribution GNU/Linux:
You aren't really making yourself clear.
What is the error you got?
What is the diff between the standard apt.preferences and
the one you are using.
In the interests of clarity
The error was as follows:
Package console-data has no available version, but exists in the database. This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interestingly, dbootstrap/kbdconfig.c already has this
commented out for PPC,
but not for m68k. Should I send a patch to comment it
out in keymaps.sh and for m68k?
Sure. It should be in sync.
It also occurs in dbootstrap/langs/german.src, but I'm
not really
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 04:51:16PM +0200, Thierry Laronde wrote:
FWIW, on the 10th of april has been released a version of Busybox including
a 22k vi. Perhaps, in the future, the end of the small editors wars ;)
:) but how close to a ``real'' vi is it?
/me goes to find out . . .
-john
--
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 03:36:58PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we can get ppc cleaned up!
Hope so!
For the time being I just commented out mac-de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap.gz in
keymaps.sh. I didn't see any good solution for what looked like a missing
maintainer. (It doesn't look
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:54:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
[suggestion to add telnet/netcat to boot-floppies]
I guess I would really shelf this for now... or just take suggestions
and leave them in todo for now.
busybox 0.51 (others also?) includes netcat and telnet. i guess its a
moot
Thank you Enrique. I'll check it.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on "Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:18:39 +0100",
with "Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support",
Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have built newt packages with the utf8 patch. They are at
Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 09:50:15AM -0700 wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:54:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
[suggestion to add telnet/netcat to boot-floppies]
s/telnet\//
telnet is already there. see the attachment to:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot-0104/msg00400.html
for the contents
Repository: boot-floppies
who:pb
time: Fri Apr 13 11:03:56 PDT 2001
Log Message:
use 2.2.19 for potato on arm
Files:
changed:Tag: potato config
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:07:01PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:32:27PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is *anything* missing for 2.2r3 wrt. boot-floppies?
Not sure I understand the question -- I guess not as far as I
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:56:06AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Dan, let me know when you have all the Potato source in good shape.
At that point we can burn the new version, I can do a source upload
and i386 binary version.
I already have the hdg/hdh bug fix in CVS which I think makes it
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:21:42PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 01:15:23AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it is possible NOW to have a fully working `make linux bootable from
the hard disk' step on newworld powermacs. right
tag 64565 + fixed
tag 67510 + fixed
tag 75018 + fixed
tag 77048 + fixed
tag 92907 + fixed
tag 93054 + fixed
tag 93069 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date:
Installing:
bf-common_2.3.1_i386.tar.gz byhand
boot-floppies_2.3.1_all.deb
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_2.3.1_all.deb
bf-doc_2.3.1_i386.tar.gz byhand
bf-images-1.20_2.3.1_i386.tar.gz byhand
boot-floppies_2.3.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_2.3.1.tar.gz
tag 79734 + fixed
tag 82482 + fixed
tag 85397 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:20:21 -0400
Source: boot-floppies
Binary:
Installing:
bf-sun4dm-pci_2.3.0_sparc.tar.gz byhand
bf-images-1.44_2.3.0_sparc.tar.gz byhand
boot-floppies_2.3.0.dsc
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_2.3.0.dsc
boot-floppies_2.3.0_all.deb
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_2.3.0_all.deb
bf-archive-install_2.3.0_sparc.sh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 64565 + fixed
Bug#64565: base unpack should have progress bar
Tags added: fixed
tag 67510 + fixed
Bug#67510: nf_http_fetchfile couldn't resolve host name
Tags added: fixed
tag 75018 + fixed
Bug#75018: [WOODY] please symlink base#_#.tgz
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 79734 + fixed
Bug#79734: [i18n] /etc/fstab is in unicode
Tags added: fixed
tag 82482 + fixed
Bug#82482: /boot/vmlinuz softlink misdirected
Bug#68497: potato sparc /etc/silo.conf irregularity
Tags added: fixed
tag 85397 + fixed
Bug#85397: 2.2r2
Just a quicky before I have to bail for family time.
rootdisk.sh dies complaining that recode doesn't like the input. I searched far
and wide and can't find a definition for $charset anywhere. So for giggles I
defined it to be ISO-8559-1 (this is to recode the end-of-line for boot_message
which
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:46:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quicky before I have to bail for family time.
rootdisk.sh dies complaining that recode doesn't like the input. I searched far
and wide and can't find a definition for $charset anywhere. So for giggles I
defined it to
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:35:27PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based on kernel
2.4? If so, will the installation program support reiserfs, a parted frontend, will
it support reiserfs as a default install method, parted to
Would it be possible to get a status update on woody/i18n/utf
boot-floppies once you have done that? Possily put in 'todo' ?
I assume we're going to have to switch to use the -utf8 versions of
slang/newt, use the new bf-utf package (is that available yet?), and
try to make sure all those
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated 13 Apr 2001 19:35:44 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bugs closed as of boot-floppies 2.3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Repository: boot-floppies
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 17:05:53 PDT 2001
Log Message:
Stephen R. Marenka patch: disable mac/mac-de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap.gz
on PowerPC until console-data is fixed
Files:
changed:keymaps.sh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 17:05:58 PDT 2001
Log Message:
Stephen R. Marenka patch: disable mac/mac-de-latin1-nodeadkeys.kmap.gz
on PowerPC until console-data is fixed
Files:
changed:kbdconfig.c
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Repository: boot-floppies
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 17:13:09 PDT 2001
Log Message:
James Deikun patch: use libc version 2.2.2 for powerpc
Files:
changed:rootdisk.sh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Repository: boot-floppies
who:aph
time: Fri Apr 13 17:13:52 PDT 2001
Log Message:
start collecting a list of packages that need to be in testing but
aren't, so we can coorindate our bug filing on them
Files:
changed:todo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Dwayne C. Litzenberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:35:27PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based on kernel
2.4?
It is not currently planned, for boot-floppies 2.3.x anyhow, to move to
the 2.4
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:03:48AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Woah, uh, if we do that, does that mean we have to ship those split
images as part of boot-floppies? God, I hope not.
Nah, I figure we just write a script that lets people generate
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:20:12PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
"Dwayne C. Litzenberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If so, will the installation program support reiserfs, a parted
frontend, will it support reiserfs as a default install method,
Well, absolutely not the default, but it's a
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:28:22PM -0700, Sam Powers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:20:12PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
"Dwayne C. Litzenberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If so, will the installation program support reiserfs, a parted
frontend, will it support reiserfs as a default
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap
who:dwhedon
time: Fri Apr 13 17:39:33 PDT 2001
Log Message:
utils.c: remove progress_execlog(), not using it anymore.
extract_base.c: calling debootstrap in a more complicated way now to allow for
a better UI including status
I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based on
kernel 2.4?
It is not currently planned, for boot-floppies 2.3.x anyhow, to move to the
2.4 kernels.
Really? If the release is not going to be until the summer, I would think it
to be really unwise to use Kernel
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:15:35PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based on
kernel 2.4?
It is not currently planned, for boot-floppies 2.3.x anyhow, to move to the
2.4 kernels.
Really? If the release is not
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 06:24:27PM -0700, Sam Powers wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:15:35PM -0600, Dwayne C. Litzenberger wrote:
I was just wondering, will the next Debian release (2.3?) be based
on kernel 2.4?
It is not currently planned, for boot-floppies 2.3.x anyhow, to
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
