cvs commit to debian-installer/tools/ddetect/debian by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: debian-installer/tools/ddetect/debian who:dwhedon time: Tue May 8 00:02:36 PDT 2001 Log Message: bump dpkg build depend version Files: changed:control -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

cvs commit to debian-installer/tools/netcfg/debian by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: debian-installer/tools/netcfg/debian who:dwhedon time: Tue May 8 00:01:47 PDT 2001 Log Message: bump dpkg-dev build depends version Files: changed:control -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

cvs commit to debian-installer/tools/netcfg/debian by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: debian-installer/tools/netcfg/debian who:dwhedon time: Mon May 7 23:46:17 PDT 2001 Log Message: use new dpkg features so build is less cludgy Files: changed:changelog rules -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

RE: problem mit neuem kernel, gerätekonflikt etc.

2001-05-08 Thread RIBNITZ Robert
Hallo, willkommenm auf der Liste. a) Kernel 2.4.x braucht die neue version der Modutils, die wiederum die neue libc6 will. Potato funktioniert aus diesem grunde nicht mit 2.4.x kernel (dist-upgrade auf woody loest das problem. Wenn es nurt um einfachere USB funktionen geht, gibt es die auch in

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Sam Hartman
Anthony == Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anthony On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:32:10PM -0400, Sam Hartman Anthony wrote: So, I think that support in tools besides tasksel is critical to this policy proposal being useful. I don't like the idea of having

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 09:55:48AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: Anthony == Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anthony Remember: the point of tasks is to make the initial Anthony install simpler, so that people can get started on Debian Anthony without having to wade through

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Sam Hartman
Anthony == Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, that was the original point of tasks. However, tasks are also used today by people who want to get a set of software installed after the initial install. [...] Yet I understand we have finite time. Would it be

Re: di: seperate preperation and installation phases

2001-05-08 Thread Tim Middelkoop
I got board one weekend and have done this in a way for debian-linux-i386 and it works quite well. I had initially done a single prep/build environment but it got too messy. The separation of phases helped keep the complexity of both systems down. Phase I is a good rescue environment and

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Anthony Towns wrote: You can always run tasksel, select the task, and go Ok, instead of using apt-get install ... though. Making tasksel install server-dns just go ahead and install the task, bypassing the UI, would be fairly simple too. Another option would be to add real reverse dependancy

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Anthony Towns wrote: So, here's the deal. We need to get a proper policy for tasks fairly soon. Amen. tasksel in sid supports a Task: header for packages so we can be a little more flexible than having every task- depend on everythig in it. This was discussed on -devel just after potato

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 12:19:20PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: Anthony == Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anthony You Anthony check the code out from CVS, or do an apt-get source, you Anthony write the code, and you send it to Randolph. It doesn't Anthony need

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:05:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I don't recall a discussion of or decision on using overrides files. Well, uh, you were in it... Overrides files may not be quite the most accurate way of expressing it. Certainly, I don't mean overrides files that ftpmaster takes care

cvs commit to debian-installer/tools/ddetect/debian by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: debian-installer/tools/ddetect/debian who:dwhedon time: Tue May 8 12:14:21 PDT 2001 Log Message: change to priority standard Files: changed:control -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

cvs commit to base-config/debian by joeyh

2001-05-08 Thread joeyh
Repository: base-config/debian who:joeyh time: Tue May 8 13:34:09 PDT 2001 Log Message: * Reworded the simple, advanced question, adding a third option to not install anything more. All translations need to be updated.. * Removed PERL_BADLANG hack. If the boot

cvs commit to base-config by joeyh

2001-05-08 Thread joeyh
Repository: base-config who:joeyh time: Tue May 8 13:34:09 PDT 2001 Log Message: * Reworded the simple, advanced question, adding a third option to not install anything more. All translations need to be updated.. * Removed PERL_BADLANG hack. If the boot floppies are

Bug#96793: boot-floppies build depends on nonexistant debiandoc.decl

2001-05-08 Thread bame
package: boot-floppies version: CVS-8-may-2001 Trying to build boot-floppies on parisc/hppa (so take this with a grain of salt), documentation/Makefile depends on debiandoc.decl which used to be delivered by debiandoc-sgml (e.g., version 1.1.44) but which is no longer available (checked 1.1.46

cvs commit to debian-installer/tools/niccfg by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: debian-installer/tools/niccfg who:dwhedon time: Tue May 8 17:37:43 PDT 2001 Log Message: This tools isn't necessary anymore. Files: removed:Makefile TODO niccfg-manual.c utils.c utils.h -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

cvs commit to debian-installer/tools/niccfg/debian by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: debian-installer/tools/niccfg/debian who:dwhedon time: Tue May 8 17:37:43 PDT 2001 Log Message: This tools isn't necessary anymore. Files: removed:changelog control copyright menutest niccfg-manual.templates rules -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

cvs commit to debian-installer/tools/ddetect/debian by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: debian-installer/tools/ddetect/debian who:dwhedon time: Tue May 8 17:45:20 PDT 2001 Log Message: German translations contributed by Sebastian Feltel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: changed:changelog ethdetect.templates -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit to modconf by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: modconf who:dwhedon time: Tue May 8 18:09:46 PDT 2001 Log Message: Galician translation of modconf's templates contributed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: changed:Makefile -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

cvs commit to modconf/debian by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: modconf/debian who:dwhedon time: Tue May 8 18:09:46 PDT 2001 Log Message: Galician translation of modconf's templates contributed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: changed:changelog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

cvs commit to modconf/template by dwhedon

2001-05-08 Thread dwhedon
Repository: modconf/template who:dwhedon time: Tue May 8 18:09:47 PDT 2001 Log Message: Galician translation of modconf's templates contributed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Files: added: eval_gl.fixed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:05:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I don't recall a discussion of or decision on using overrides files. Well, uh, you were in it... Overrides files may not be quite the most accurate way of expressing it. Certainly, I

Processed: tags

2001-05-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 95851 fixed Bug#95851: modconf: Galician translation of modconf's templates Tags added: fixed This has been applied to modconf cvs. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
It occurs to me that what AJ's trying to do and its results can perhaps be restated as follows (with apologies to AJ -- you have the best of intentions): * Move control of what packages a task includes out of the hands of the creator of the task, and into the hands of people who have commits

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:34:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: * Move control of what packages a task includes out of the hands of the creator of the task, and into the hands of people who have commits to some cvs repository somewhere[1]. Like boot-floppies CVS which every developer and a few

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Joey Hess
Anthony Towns wrote: Or moving them into the task package themselves, but not in the control record? Or shall we just forget I suggested that originally. Well, I had. That's a reasonable alternative. Oh, except, I seem to remember you wanted to use some special-purpose field for it, when we

Re: Submitting bugs/ideas

2001-05-08 Thread Chris Tillman
Hi, This is probably a newbie question, but I've found a few bugs and I dont know how/where to post them, if someone could show me how, I'd be much obliged thanks- Andrew Take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=boot-floppiesarchive=no to be sure your bugs are

Re: Tasks policy

2001-05-08 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 11:04:34PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Anthony Towns wrote: Or moving them into the task package themselves, but not in the control record? Or shall we just forget I suggested that originally. Well, I had. Well, it's possible I wasn't explicit enough. What I said was: