Stefan Gybas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 04:09:06AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
its easy enough to export it if we need to, i doubt it would cause any harm.
rootdisk.sh already exports ldlib (defined per arch), so we can just use
this variable.
mklibs.py is
Repository: boot-floppies/debian
who:eb
time: Thu Nov 15 05:43:44 PST 2001
Log Message:
- recent portability patch to mklibs.py requires python 2 so
Build-depend on python-dev (= 2.1.1-4), python2.1-xml.
- Fix utilities/dbootstrap/langs/Makefile: PYTHON_VERSION=2.1
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap/langs
who:eb
time: Thu Nov 15 05:43:44 PST 2001
Log Message:
- recent portability patch to mklibs.py requires python 2 so
Build-depend on python-dev (= 2.1.1-4), python2.1-xml.
- Fix utilities/dbootstrap/langs/Makefile:
Repository: boot-floppies/debian
who:eb
time: Thu Nov 15 06:18:16 PST 2001
Log Message:
mklibs.py now seems to work on powerpc, use it now.
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Repository: boot-floppies
who:eb
time: Thu Nov 15 06:18:15 PST 2001
Log Message:
mklibs.py now seems to work on powerpc, use it now.
Files:
changed:rootdisk.sh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Your message dated Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:58:17 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line CD image incomplete
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
I've got a question: I want to install Woody (which I have on cdrom)
on a 486 with a 3 1/2 - drive and a cdrom-drive, but without the
ability to boot from cdrom. The problem is, the box has only 8 megs
of ram, which - according to the help texts of the installer on the
cdroms is not enough
I'm trying to make some custom boot floppies for Woody with xfs support
and have managed to hack the package enough to make it work with one
exception. When the installation reaches the point of installing the
base system it gets hung up on the installation of the pcmcia-cs package.
It can't
Hi,
Booting the installation CD (non-US) of debian 2.2 r3 fails on my
spare machine (AMD K6-2, 500MHz, IDE-only machine with 2 hard disks,
128 M RAM, ATAPI IDE DVD cdrom drive). The kernel looks for scsi
devices that are not present (as far as I can tell, and that it
cannot find) and hangs on
Rejected: md5sum check failed for bf-images-1.20_3.0.17_i386.tar.gz.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
Your rejected files are in incoming/REJECT/. (Some may also be in
incoming/ if your .changes file was
I hope this is going to the correct place. If not please let me know and
I will direct future questions elsewhere.
I have a problem with the install scripts on intel and on sparc for woody.
The problem on intel is that the ppp package now requires libpcap0 which
isn't in the install list of
Hello,
I'm as usual tempted to test the boot floppies but to be honest
getting floppy images, dding (very slow). Booting with
floppies (slow) is just too time consuming with limited time
for a test.
On the other hand if there would be a mini ISO image with content of
floppy images + base ...
$B$3$N%a!<%k$O(B $B%[!<%`%Z!<%8$r3+@_$5$l$F$$$kJ}$K$*Aw$j$7$F$$$^$9!#(B
$B%a!<%k$rITMW$H$5$l$kJ}$O$3$N$^$^JVAw$/$@$5$$!#(B
$B%a!<%k$rAw?.$7$J$$$h$&$K$$$?$7$^$9!#(B
$BJ#?t%I%a%$%sMQ%l%s%?%k%5!<%P!<$N(B Ultra Speed Net
Hi,
On hppa and ia64, I see the cursor flashing on most (but not all)
screens during first stage install - e.g on the main menu, and on
the end of the progress bar. I think the cursor used to be
switched off except for input dialogs. Are other archs seeing this
too - or has it always been the
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 01:58:26PM -0600, Brian Dolan-Goecke wrote:
I hope this is going to the correct place. If not please let me know and
I will direct future questions elsewhere.
I have a problem with the install scripts on intel and on sparc for woody.
The problem on intel is that
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:06:38PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
your missing the point:
what good will this do? the permissions of the mount point
directory are irrelevant as they will be replaced by the
permissions of the root directory of the mounted filesystem.
this patch
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:41:52PM +1300, Mark van Walraven wrote:
If I didn't have important reason to get the system up quickly, I'd just
work away in single-user mode. If /var/tmp is only writeable by root,
some critical applications won't work properly.
bzzzt. thanks for playing.
Repository: boot-floppies/debian
who:cts
time: Thu Nov 15 17:42:21 PST 2001
Log Message:
do not ship outdated m68k quickinstall docs
Files:
changed:changelog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repository: boot-floppies
who:cts
time: Thu Nov 15 17:42:21 PST 2001
Log Message:
do not ship outdated m68k quickinstall docs
Files:
changed:release.sh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:51:55PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:41:52PM +1300, Mark van Walraven wrote:
If I didn't have important reason to get the system up quickly, I'd just
work away in single-user mode. If /var/tmp is only writeable by root,
some critical
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:44:53PM +1300, Mark van Walraven wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:51:55PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
-
i have yet to see any proof of this.
I don't believe you ever will see it.
I wish to apologise to Ethan and the list for my petulant and unfair remark.
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Thursday, November 15, 2001 at 04:27:51
---
: To see the highest quality in hardcore pics in which to have access you:
p align=centerDo
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:42:10PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
People with such old hardware are probably better of with bo or hamm
or potato. They probably need the low-mem target too.
which are not (or will not in potato's case) be supported
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:51:55PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:41:52PM +1300, Mark van Walraven wrote:
If I didn't have important reason to get the system up quickly, I'd just
work away in single-user mode. If /var/tmp is only writeable by root,
some critical
24 matches
Mail list logo
