On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 07:57:22AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
we don't need real developing in b-f. B-f should only a fall back for
sarge, if d-i is not ready.
I suppose it was a while ago now, but it's still a bit sad that people
are forgetting this is _exactly_ what we were saying for
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 09:24, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:28, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I looked that symlinks of /lib/ld-2.2.5 to
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (and others) was missing.
Title: Cards In Advance
Birthday
Anniversary
Get Well Soon
Thinking of you
Congratulations
Sympathy
Engagement
Good Luck
New Baby
New Home
Love & Romance
Friendship
Retirement
Graduation
Thank You
Valentine's Day (Feb)
Passover (Apr)
Easter (Apr)
Mother's Day
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 05:17:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 07:57:22AM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
we don't need real developing in b-f. B-f should only a fall back for
sarge, if d-i is not ready.
I suppose it was a while ago now, but it's still a bit sad that
* Philip Blundell
| On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 09:24, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
| On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:28, Matt Kraai wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
|Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I looked that symlinks of /lib/ld-2.2.5 to
|
On Wed Jul 24, 2002 at 11:28:46AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I looked that symlinks of /lib/ld-2.2.5 to
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (and others) was missing.
Please remind me: why do we need to
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 10:21, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Philip Blundell
| On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 09:24, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
| On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:28, Matt Kraai wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
|Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 05:17:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I suppose it was a while ago now, but it's still a bit sad that people
are forgetting this is _exactly_ what we were saying for woody.
Of course we didn't actually do that for woody. We changed a whole heck
of a lot in b-f, moved
Erik Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed Jul 24, 2002 at 11:28:46AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:42:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Hi, I tried to rebuild d-i and I looked that symlinks of /lib/ld-2.2.5 to
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (and others) was missing.
Hello,
First two problems come actually from the site:
1. if you wantio to download install the stuff,
'install' then you go on an infinite loop from
installfromnetwork-fromfloppies-download-mirrors-installfromnetwork.
Fun fun fun. No files.
2. The mirrors are NOT organized as described, I mean
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
b-f's as a fallback doesn't work, it's too thorougly unmaintainable. Or
installation system needs _major_ work, easy solutions like just fall
back to boot-floppies *don't* work.
It's quite interesting that you insist on b-f being so
Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
Is it really useful to be able to do that for the installation disks?
Without information on what Debian patches have been applied, knowing
the base version number of the library doesn't seem to buy much. If
it's important to be able to
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 12:58:51AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| And another question : what will be the default kernel for
| debian-installer : 2.2.x or 2.4.x ? It's for
| debian-installer/tools/ddetect/lst/*.ids. We can use discover's
| *.ids, but they use 2.2.x kernel module names. So
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 11:46:37PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
b-f's as a fallback doesn't work, it's too thorougly unmaintainable. Or
installation system needs _major_ work, easy solutions like just fall
back to boot-floppies *don't*
* Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-22 22:24]:
Actually, I've asked people at debian-devel for the things they want
in console-tools-v2. Short answer is: Nobody cares.
1. Split console-data on multiple packages.
2. Throw away or minimize debconf usage.
I'd like to see console-* go
Package: boot-floppies
Version: woody
flavor: vanilla
architecture: i386
model: ASUS L8400B (laptop)
memory: 128Mb
cd-rom:TEAC CD-232E
network card: RTL8139
When I wan't to make boot floppy disk, It gives me
that the floppy is write protected but when I wan't to report a bug, it write's
to
Repository: boot-floppies
who:jordi
time: Thu Jul 25 14:28:19 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Catalan fixes by Robert Millan.
Files:
changed:README-Users.ca.m4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap/langs
who:jordi
time: Thu Jul 25 14:28:21 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Catalan fixes by Robert Millan.
Files:
changed:catalan.src
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Repository: boot-floppies/scripts/rescue/messages/ca
who:jordi
time: Thu Jul 25 14:28:20 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Catalan fixes by Robert Millan.
Files:
changed:debian.txt debian.txt.sparc f1.txt f10.txt f2.txt f3.txt f4.txt f5.txt
f6.txt f7.txt f8.txt f9.txt
--
To
Repository: boot-floppies/documentation
who:jordi
time: Thu Jul 25 14:28:20 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Catalan fixes by Robert Millan.
Files:
changed:dselect-beginner.ca.sgml index.ca.html.m4 release-notes.ca.sgml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Repository: boot-floppies/documentation/ja
who:kubota
time: Thu Jul 25 17:56:18 PDT 2002
Log Message:
unification of translated words by TAKEI Nobumitsu.
Files:
changed:preparing.sgml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
21 matches
Mail list logo
