It gives the same error.
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado por: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/09/2002 17:41
Para:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto:
Re: DAC960- Firmware verification failed
- detaching
#include hallo.h
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are publishers of specialized reports and
directories dealing with public affairs. Our new
directory, The United States Healthcare Directory
covers hospitals, nursing homes, HMOs, medical
manufacturers, etc. For more information, kindly
visit our website at www.national-directories.com
or
At 8:33 +0200 9/13/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote something like:
boot: compact
Try bf2.4
It gives the same error.
IMO you need to build a kernel with support for your DAC960 diskcontroller.
BTW please reply below the text in an one-to-many-conversation (Mailinglists)
Geert St
--
To
I've been fiddling with Description-XYZ fields in control files, for the
purpose of i18n in main-menu, and, well, dpkg doesn't like my UTF-8 :(
I've got this in anna/debian/control:
Description: Finish setting up the Debian installer
anna's not nearly apt, but for the Debian installer, it
On Sun, 2002-09-08 at 23:28, Denis Barbier wrote:
Seriously my feeling is that users are getting bored when they
choose a language and provided default values do not take this
information into accout (when choosing keyboard layout, mirrors,
default system language, etc.).
From what I
#include hallo.h
* John H. Robinson, IV [Wed, Sep 11 2002, 12:13:27PM]:
actually, i was asked to produce a 2.4.19bf kernel, which i have. if we
need updated 2.4.18, i'll provide that.
expect 2.4.18bf u/l by friday
If you have not done yet, please wait. I am preparing an unofficial set
of
sure, still valid UTF-8, but it's UTF-8 for what the UTF-8 is if
interpreted according to Latin1. I thought dpkg didn't assume anything
at all about the encoding in control files? That it expected us-ascii
and damn everyone who didn't follow that. Can I fix this somehow, or are
we doomed
fre 2002-09-13 klockan 10.18 skrev Junichi Uekawa:
sure, still valid UTF-8, but it's UTF-8 for what the UTF-8 is if
interpreted according to Latin1. I thought dpkg didn't assume anything
at all about the encoding in control files? That it expected us-ascii
and damn everyone who didn't
* Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-13 10:02]:
* Michael Cardenas
| Great! Where should I look? Is it part of anna?
No, there is something in the attic of tools/ddetect
There are, at least, two methods for hard drive detection.
* with parted
* with discover
For parted, you can
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:32:59PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
Repository: debian-installer/doc
who:porridge
* only run cdebconf (and thus whole debian-installer) in
On 13 Sep 2002 10:29:55 +0200
Could we move that out of Description-xx: lines to
generate some kind of po file?
Believe me, nobody would be happier than me if we used po files instead
;)
I was only working with it like this because this was the current
concept of translating the
fre 2002-09-13 klockan 11.20 skrev Junichi Uekawa:
I had an impression that udebs description lines were translated through
ddtp also ?
That may be so
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel
boot: compact
Try bf2.4
It gives the same error.
IMO you need to build a kernel with support for
your DAC960 diskcontroller.
BTW please reply below the text in an one-to-many-conversation
(Mailinglists)
Ok, supose that i make this kernel,
and how do i install the system ? I could i use
* Thomas Poindessous
| * Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-13 10:02]:
| * Michael Cardenas
|
| | Great! Where should I look? Is it part of anna?
|
| No, there is something in the attic of tools/ddetect
|
| There are, at least, two methods for hard drive detection.
| * with
[Junichi Uekawa]
Are you mentioning pointerize ?
No, I was thinking about a patch I made to boot-floppies to choose
translation from a prioritized list of languages. The patch was not
accepted, if I recall correctly.
I've been talking about pointerize in other contexts without
remembering
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
sure, still valid UTF-8, but it's UTF-8 for what the UTF-8 is if
interpreted according to Latin1. I thought dpkg didn't assume anything
at all about the encoding in control files? That it expected us-ascii
and damn
16 matches
Mail list logo