ÀÏ°åµÄ¿àÄÕ
¾ÀíµÄÀ§»ó£º
u
ÏúÊÛÈÎÎñÈçºÎÖƶ¨£¿
u
ÈçºÎ·ÖÎöÊг¡£¬Öƶ¨È«ÄêÈÎÎñ£¿
u
ÈçºÎʹÏúÁ¿ºÍÀûÈó×î´ó»¯£¿
u
È˲ÅÄÑÇó£¬ÈËԱƵ·±Á÷¶¯£¬¹¤³§¡¢ÆóÒµÏÝÓÚÎÞ¾¡ÎÞÖ¹µÄÕÐƸ¡úÅàѵ¡ú´Ç¹¤¡úÕÐƸ¡úÅàѵµÄËÀÐÔÑ»·ÖС£
u
²»ÖªµÀÔ±¹¤µÄÕæʵÐèÇóºÍÇé¸ÐËßÇó¡£
u
ÎÞ·¨Öƶ¨¿ÆѧµÄ¼¤Àø»úÖÆ£¬·½·¨¡£
Hi,
Here's a patch which fixes the incorrect usage of strstr for PowerPC
in kbdconfig.c - which causes the wrong keyboard choices to appear on
non-apus PowerPC hardware.
Regards,
Ross..
--- boot-floppies-cvs-original/utilities/dbootstrap/kbdconfig.c Tue Aug 13 01:32:30
2002
+++
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 06:54:33PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
[...]
The current implementation is documented in tools/cdebconf/doc/TODO and
has been floating around for a while. It wasn't really I who requested
it.
[...]
Ack.
In order to propose a better design we have to know how progress
Hello,
I'm working on a network of computers with hard disks, but without any floppy nor
CD-Rom drives,
and I've installed them through the network (with some problems, but it finally works).
In case of hard disk failure, I would like to be able to load a mini Debian system
through
tis 2003-01-14 klockan 14.10 skrev Denis Barbier:
In order to propose a better design we have to know how progress
bars will be used. Your example in anna is lightening, are there
other possible uses? Are several progress bars needed?
I suppose there will be a progress bar in debootstrap,
* (Denis Barbier)
| In order to propose a better design we have to know how progress
| bars will be used. Your example in anna is lightening, are there
| other possible uses? Are several progress bars needed?
Several ones would be good for base-installation (so it can show how
far it has done
#include hallo.h
* Ross Vumbaca [Tue, Jan 14 2003, 09:49:53PM]:
Here's a patch which fixes the incorrect usage of strstr for PowerPC
in kbdconfig.c - which causes the wrong keyboard choices to appear on
non-apus PowerPC hardware.
a) please, create a new thread and do not sent a follow-up
[Martin Sjögren]
I suppose there will be a progress bar in debootstrap, like the one
existing right now, but converted to a new protocol. Other than that, I
don't know, those are the most time consuming activities right now that
I know of.
autopartkit could use some progress bars. :)
--
To
Accepted:
busybox-cvs-static_0.60.99.cvs20030114-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_0.60.99.cvs20030114-1_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20030114-1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20030114-1_i386.udeb
I can do a big load at the boot of this mini-system, but
due to technical constraints, i can't use a NFS exported partition (of a server) to
realize it.
What kind of technical constraints is it that you can't use a NFS exported partition?
I usually find it convenient to use NFS-root.
10 matches
Mail list logo