Hi,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 07:28:42PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
I found a spot in boot-floppies where this could happen, and added a
check. I think this will have to wait for r3 though. Do you see any
possible workarounds in the find_unused_loop_device() code in
losetup.c?
Yes, don't
(sorry)
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 09:47:25AM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
I suspect with that things go wrong earlier, causing get_device() in
extract_kernel.c to be called with an empty (non-null) image parameter.
It seems this can happen in extract_kernel.c, choose_and_install(), if
both
#include hallo.h
* Emile van Bergen [Fri, Feb 21 2003, 09:47:25AM]:
I found a spot in boot-floppies where this could happen, and added a
check. I think this will have to wait for r3 though. Do you see any
possible workarounds in the find_unused_loop_device() code in
losetup.c?
Yes,
#include hallo.h
* Eduard Bloch [Fri, Feb 21 2003, 10:20:45AM]:
Yes, don't try extracting the kernel more than 7 times (assuming
del_loop doesn't get called appropriately) ;-)
Heh? IIRC this is dead code, I replaced loop-device operations with
direct losetup calls during the Woody freeze
* Michael Cardenas wrote:
Akira, Your udebs look great, but since the last time I talked to you,
we discussed some more of the details here on the list with Sebastian
Lay and Junichi, and came up with the following plan:
It seems that for udebs with libraries, we need to have the
Accepted:
rootskel_0.19.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.19.dsc
rootskel_0.19.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.19.tar.gz
rootskel_0.19_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.19_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:32:25AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Does the target for the symlink exist? Its lack also causes that symptom.
it exist.
--
Thorsten Sauter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
#include hallo.h
* John Summerfield [Fri, Feb 21 2003, 02:10:57PM]:
to be a lot of interest, but not too much concrete input. Maybe
one of the issues is there are so many ways to get it to work?
If I were to write it (assuming I knew enough, which at present I don't), you
could probably
I want to upload cdebconf pretty soon, so I can upload cdrom-checker for
Thorsten.
Does anybody have any objections? Any more stuff to go in before upload?
/M
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel
Accepted:
busybox-cvs-static_0.60.99.cvs20030221-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_0.60.99.cvs20030221-1_i386.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20030221-1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-udeb_0.60.99.cvs20030221-1_i386.udeb
Package: di-utils-mkfs
Version: 0.16
Severity: normal
Running Create a file system (di-utils-mkfs) on a drive
with no partitions causes this error:
di-utils-mkfs's postinst exited with status 5120
The fix is either to tell the user that there are no partitions,
or (IMHO the preferred way for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 175187 cdrom-detect
Bug#175187: debootstrap: eject missing from basedebs.tar
Bug reassigned from package `debootstrap' to `cdrom-detect'.
tag 175187 pending
Bug#175187: debootstrap: eject missing from basedebs.tar
There were no tags set.
Tags
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:36:03PM +0100, Oskar Liljeblad wrote:
Running Create a file system (di-utils-mkfs) on a drive
with no partitions causes this error:
di-utils-mkfs's postinst exited with status 5120
See also #180694.
The fix is either to tell the user that there are no
Accepted:
cdebconf-slang-udeb_0.31_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-slang-udeb_0.31_i386.udeb
cdebconf-udeb_0.31_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-udeb_0.31_i386.udeb
cdebconf_0.31.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.31.dsc
cdebconf_0.31.tar.gz
to
On Friday, February 21, 2003 at 15:00, Matt Kraai wrote:
The fix is either to tell the user that there are no partitions,
or (IMHO the preferred way for experts) allow the user to create
a file system on the whole disk. Theoretical (untested) fix
below.
Why would you prefer not to
(new) cdrom-checker_0.01.dsc optional debian-installer
(new) cdrom-checker_0.01.tar.gz optional debian-installer
(new) cdrom-checker_0.01_all.udeb optional debian-installer
Verify the cd contents
Use this module to verify the current installation cdrom.
Changes: cdrom-checker (0.01) unstable;
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:32:10 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#181081: fixed in cdebconf 0.31
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:32:10 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#181083: fixed in cdebconf 0.31
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:32:09 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#180299: fixed in cdebconf 0.31
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Fri, 21 Feb 2003 18:32:10 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#181088: fixed in cdebconf 0.31
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since the last status report, almost three months have passed, we have
had a quite successful alpha release and much has changed.
Debian-installer is still able to install Debian, so that hasn't
changed. :) The goals set in the last status report
21 matches
Mail list logo
