Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
fre 2003-02-28 klockan 21.22 skrev Emile van Bergen:
I mean, tasksel?! No offense, but I highly doubt that a sane installer
really needs something like tasksel to select which installer modules
should be downloaded at run
Hi Guys,
I've tried a number of times to install 3.0r0 from
a set of 7 cd's purchased over the internet but before the first installation cd
has finished I'm advised that it is unable to install the base
system.
file:/instmnt/pool/main/a/adduser/adduser_3.47_all.deb
was corrupt couldn't
lör 2003-03-01 klockan 09.08 skrev Emile van Bergen:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
fre 2003-02-28 klockan 21.22 skrev Emile van Bergen:
I mean, tasksel?! No offense, but I highly doubt that a sane installer
really needs something like tasksel to
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Larry Gilbert
| Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|Also, having somebody with a good touch for English to go
|through the templates would be nice.
|
| I wouldn't mind helping with this, but I can't seem to figure out how
|
Someone else will be better equipped to
reply to your specific issue, but I wanted to give you feedback that I have
successfully installed 3.0r1 (rev 1) from 7 CDs (mostly done with the 1st
CD) without such difficulties, so you may want to persist
If youve only recently purchased
your
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:15:58AM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
lör 2003-03-01 klockan 09.08 skrev Emile van Bergen:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 10:00:24PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
fre 2003-02-28 klockan 21.22 skrev Emile van Bergen:
I mean, tasksel?! No offense, but I
Dear mr. Dale,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:58:10PM +1000, Bernard Jean Dale wrote:
I've tried a number of times to install 3.0r0 from a set of 7 cd's
purchased over the internet but before the first installation cd has
finished I'm advised that it is unable to install the base system.
#include hallo.h
* Bernard Jean Dale [Sat, Mar 01 2003, 06:58:10PM]:
I've tried a number of times to install 3.0r0 from a set of 7 cd's
purchased over the internet but before the first installation cd has
finished I'm advised that it is unable to install the base system.
ons 2003-02-26 klockan 15.08 skrev Martin Quinson:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Larry Gilbert
| Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|Also, having somebody with a good touch for English to go
|through the templates would be nice.
|
| I wouldn't
Hi
3. The kernel you are using isn't compiled with
CONFIG_PACKET=y and
CONFIG_FILTER=y
This stuff is needed for the dhcp client to operate AFAIK.
Sorry, of course you can also have them built as a module, but then you also have
to have them installed.
Op za 01-03-2003, om 05:57 schreef Christian T. Steigies:
But you are right, we should get 2.4 working instead of hacking devfs into
or out of d-i...
Sure, but in the mean time we have to make sure there's an installer for
m68k that actually works. Else we could just as well shut down all m68k
Op za 01-03-2003, om 00:16 schreef Petter Reinholdtsen:
[Wouter Verhelst]
As some of you are already aware, there's a problem wrt m68k in that
there's no decent 2.4 kernel for m68k yet. As such, creating an m68k
debian-installer image that actually works is a bit problematic right
now,
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote, in an
exceptionally impolite mood:
file:/instmnt/pool/main/a/adduser/adduser_3.47_all.deb
was corrupt couldn't download adduser.
What is so hard to understand this message? Something is going wrong
with your CDROM
* Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Let us say a new version of libc or libdirectfb enters sid, and
udebs will be built accordingly. Since they do not have a SONAME
version, all dependant udebs will be broken because anna will pull
in the new version of the library via libc-udeb or
Hello Thomas
Please cc debian-boot, since I am not
experienced with the net install images, and the people reading -boot are in
fact the ones which built those images.
Thomas Pohl wrote:
Andreas Wüst wrote:
Hi Thomas
Thomas Pohl wrote:
Package: install-doc
Version: 3.0.24
* Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Are these libraries different (different ABI/API) from the ones in
libdirectfb-0.9-16? If they are, I'm interesting in why they are
different, and how they are different. If they are identical, you
probably should use the same file names and sonames for the
Please cc debian-boot, since I am not
OK, i put me on the mailing list and checked archive for other answers.
1. download the net boot iso image and burn a boot CD
Just a short question: did you download the testing net install image or the stable net
install image?
i took the
lör 2003-03-01 klockan 14.15 skrev Thomas Pohl:
i took the Official net install iso-images for the testing release
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/
debian home page propose to try testing for workstations, and i
thought new hardware new versions.
The problem is
Moin Martin,
Martin Sjögren wrote:
i took the Official net install iso-images for the testing release
installing woody and using apt-get dist-upgrade.
i'm afraid that's the same hint Andreas gave me...
so, what should i do:
* download CD-Images ?
* download inofficial net-install boot image
Hello Thomas
Thomas Pohl wrote:
Moin Martin,
Martin Sjögren wrote:
i took the Official net install iso-images for the testing release
Ok, that's the problem!
installing woody and using apt-get dist-upgrade.
i'm afraid that's the same hint Andreas gave me...
Because it's
But you are right, we should get 2.4 working instead of hacking devfs into
or out of d-i...
Sure, but in the mean time we have to make sure there's an installer for
m68k that actually works. Else we could just as well shut down all m68k
buildd's, as it will not be worth it anymore.
It
I would ...
i will do this new installation tomorrow
Hope I could help!
definite, yes :-)
thanks
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example, I have been away from using sparc, but my question would be
is there much sparc32 kernel hacking going on? Is 2.4.x usable on sparc32?
Architectures that are still having problems with 2.4 should probably
be dropped. Since they aren't
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 12:00:43AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi
As some of you are already aware, there's a problem wrt m68k in that
there's no decent 2.4 kernel for m68k yet. As such, creating an m68k
debian-installer image that actually works is a bit problematic right
now, since
Your message dated Sun, 2 Mar 2003 00:22:34 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line problem fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
25 matches
Mail list logo
