ons 2003-03-05 klockan 00.38 skrev Blake Pike:
I'm having a very small problem installing Debian Linux from a net
install on a Sony Vaio Laptop. When I start my installation and I get
to the installing modules part, I'm unable to see all of my choices
because they scroll off screen. I also had
ons 2003-03-05 klockan 09.42 skrev Christian T. Steigies:
Use the woody CDs to install and then apt-get dist-upgrade to whatever
distribution you want to use. The sarge CDs are there for easy testing
of debian-installer (which is still in alpha).
Not all Vaios come with a (usable) CD
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:06:06PM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote:
http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html is generated based on the regular
lintian reports at http://lintian.debian.org/. Listed on this page are
all the manpages that normally would accompany e2fsprogs-bf. However,
the man pages have
Package: install-doc
Version: 3.0.23
Only FAI is mentioned as a possible automatic installer. Others are
available inside debian :
replicator
systemimager
autoinstall
...
Please consider adding them in the doc.
SEb
--
Sebastien Chaumat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
* Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030305 07:30]:
uniprocessor sun4m works on some patched 2.4 kernels
Do you have some hints, which patches and what to be careful about?
I've severel sparcstation10 available and plan[1] to test the new
installer on them (network-booting is so nice with them).
Package: cdebconf-slang-udeb
Version: 0.31
Severity: important
I'm using the slang frontend. When the main menu contains a lot of
options, some options are not displayed, and one need to scroll to
reach the other options. When the menu first appear, the upper part
of the list is always
Package: cdrom-detect
Version: 0.11
Severity: minor
When the current cdrom-detect is executed, it prints the following
error message:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/cdrom-detect.postinst: 14: depmod: not found
This do not affect the execution, but I suspect the package should
depend on some other
ons 2003-03-05 klockan 10.14 skrev Christian T. Steigies:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:10:03AM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
What I *meant* was that if you've used a sarge CD, don't. Use a woody CD
instead. If you used a sarge floppy, don't. Use woody floppies instead.
If you use the sarge
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 02:42:53AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:16:30AM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
ons 2003-03-05 klockan 00.38 skrev Blake Pike:
Any help would be great. thanks
Use the woody CDs to install and then apt-get dist-upgrade to
Well, after discussing with aj for a while, he had the following
comment about the cdebconf progress bar API:
it sucks
;-)
Myself, I am of the opinion that it was a bad idea not to look at what
debootstrap and b-f use, when designing the API.
Short summary:
cdebconf progress bars:
progress
Now that there is a fb-modules udeb for 2.4.20, I want to use 2.4.20 in
d-i. Unless I hear any objections, I'll make the change for i386 in
build/Makefile Real Soon Now.
/M
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel
kbd-chooser_0.011_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_0.011.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.011.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.011_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:11:25PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
Now that there is a fb-modules udeb for 2.4.20, I want to use 2.4.20 in
d-i. Unless I hear any objections, I'll make the change for i386 in
build/Makefile Real Soon Now.
please do!
lvm modules are also only available for 2.4.20,
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_0.011.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.011.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.011.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.011.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.011_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.011_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs:
Accepted:
cdrom-checker_0.02.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.02.dsc
cdrom-checker_0.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.02.tar.gz
cdrom-checker_0.02_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.02_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:40:32PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
[...]
progress start (can still use this one, and it makes sense)
progress step inc (or progress set val)
progress info info
progress stop
[...]
The max value is missing:
progress set val max
The 'set' method is IMO more
Hello,
while writing some stuff for di-utils and lvmcfg, I'm wondering how the
udebs should handle debugging informations/outputs. Shouldn't be a
generic way available for this, or in other words, how many informations
(and which ones) must logged on tty3 (/var/log/(messages|syslog)).
I think
[Martin Sjögren]
Now that there is a fb-modules udeb for 2.4.20, I want to use 2.4.20 in
d-i. Unless I hear any objections, I'll make the change for i386 in
build/Makefile Real Soon Now.
Skolelinux has been using kernel 2.4.20 with d-i since 2003-01-12.
Works just fine.
I believe it is both
Sorry, sometimes it's easy to forget to include some information,
especially when you have a problem. The laptop has an external i-link
cd/dvd drive, no floppy drive. I believe I was using the Sarge, I don't
know that I had a choice. I just finished downloading all the isos, so
maybe I'll have
ons 2003-03-05 klockan 22.35 skrev Denis Barbier:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:40:32PM +0100, Martin Sjögren wrote:
[...]
progress start (can still use this one, and it makes sense)
progress step inc (or progress set val)
progress info info
progress stop
[...]
The max value is
(new) cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.32_i386.udeb standard debian-installer
Newt frontend for Debian Configuration Management System
Debconf is a configuration management system for Debian packages. It is
used by some packages to prompt you for information before they are
installed. This is a
Your message dated Wed, 05 Mar 2003 16:17:38 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#183382: fixed in kbd-chooser 0.011
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 05 Mar 2003 16:17:38 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#183359: fixed in kbd-chooser 0.011
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
I Can't trigger this bug here. Could you do the following for me:
- fetch kbd-chooser-0.011, just uploaded. Run with it,
with
ulimit -c unlimited
and send me any core (and screen results)
Alternatively, build from CVS, with
# export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug
# debuild -uc -us
I ran d-i/build/uptodatecheck.sh to get an overview of the current d-i
status. Her is the current upload info, grouped on 'needs upload' and
'version in sid'.
udeb version in cvs version in sid needs upload
Yann Dirson schrieb am Wednesday, den 05. March 2003:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:06:06PM -0800, Micah Anderson wrote:
http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html is generated based on the regular
lintian reports at http://lintian.debian.org/. Listed on this page are
all the manpages that normally
Package: kbd-chooser
Version: 0.010
Severity: minor
I do not have a USB keyboard. When I choose kbd-chooser, it shows
mount: Mounting usbdevfs on /proc/bus/usb failed: No such file or directory
installer[3353]: Failed to mount USB filesystem
installer[3353]: Setting no keybd case
Matt
--
Package: di-utils-mkswap
Version: 0.17
Severity: grave
di-utils-mkswap does not ensure that mkswap is present, leading to
the following error:
Debian Installer Main Menu
Ready to create swap space?
WARNING: all data on the partition
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 will
now be
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030305 07:30]:
uniprocessor sun4m works on some patched 2.4 kernels
Do you have some hints, which patches and what to be careful about?
I've severel sparcstation10 available and plan[1] to test the new
Since it's a generic rule that *-bf packages should not contain
manpages, I'm of the opinion that a new rule should be added to
lintian, rather than adding overrides to all *-bf packages.
Further more, since I don't think the new debian-installer is using
those *-bf packages, but uses
30 matches
Mail list logo
