email confirmation

2003-08-23 Thread Elias J. Alexakis
email confirmation Your email was successfully received. Please allow up to 12 hours for a reply. note: this is an automated email, please do not reply. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: My details( !!! ADVERTENCIA VIRUS !!! )

2003-08-23 Thread THAVEXCHANGE_HACKSOFTINET
The Hacker Antivirus encontró virus en el mensaje : Enviado por : [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] Para : / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailbox : Area Comercial Asunto : Re: Re: My details Fecha: 23/08/2003 Hora : 5:0:45 AM - Objeto :

Bug#206531: simple relink

2003-08-23 Thread Bastian Blank
i change the external abi a little bit and export any symbols. i just applied the following patch to the versions script (it just move any internal symbol to GLIBC_PRIVATE). the linked lib crashes like any reduces version even if it is linked with --whole-archive. bastian -- Immortality

RE: Thank you!

2003-08-23 Thread customerservice
We received your email addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unfortunately, your email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED], is not a registered email address on Emode Matchmaking. Please check that the email address from which you are sending this message is the same email address you registered with when you

We received your mail

2003-08-23 Thread help
Dear NYTimes.com Member: Thank you for writing to The New York Times on the Web. This automated response contains answers to the most common questions that arise after receiving a promotional e-mail message from NYTimes.com. If your question is not answered below, please check our online

Bug#206531: simple relink

2003-08-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i change the external abi a little bit and export any symbols. i just applied the following patch to the versions script (it just move any internal symbol to GLIBC_PRIVATE). the linked lib crashes like any reduces version even if it is linked with

base-installer_0.027_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-08-23 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: base-installer_0.027.dsc to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.027.dsc base-installer_0.027.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.027.tar.gz base-installer_0.027_i386.udeb to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.027_i386.udeb

Re: We received your mail

2003-08-23 Thread Chris Tillman
Received: from AI14 (unknown [217.144.224.144]) by ms2.lga2.nytimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C567D3E149 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 07:20:26 -0400 (EDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: That movie Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:22:36 +0200

Re: We received your mail

2003-08-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 06:18:25AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote: Is the user of the computer at 217.144.224.144 displeased with the debian-boot community? Stimulating unsolicited response emails to the list is certainly not the most mature way of dealing with this. No, it's just the latest

We received your mail

2003-08-23 Thread help
Dear NYTimes.com Member: Thank you for writing to The New York Times on the Web. This automated response contains answers to the most common questions that arise after receiving a promotional e-mail message from NYTimes.com. If your question is not answered below, please check our online

Processed: submitter 44010

2003-08-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 44010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#44010: boot-floppies: configuring modules lacks features Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug #169264: discover: postinst fails if /cdrom mounted [grave]

2003-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello, I understand that d-i now uses discover, and that this is therefore a likely place to find someone who would be able to address bugs in the package. There is currently a grave bug against discover for failing to install if /cdrom is mounted. There are comments in the BTS about a possible

Re: Bug #169264: discover: postinst fails if /cdrom mounted [grave]

2003-08-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, I understand that d-i now uses discover, and that this is therefore a likely place to find someone who would be able to address bugs in the package. There is currently a grave bug against discover for failing to install if /cdrom is mounted.

Re: Bug #169264: discover: postinst fails if /cdrom mounted [grave]

2003-08-23 Thread Martin Sjögren
lör 2003-08-23 klockan 22.16 skrev Steve Langasek: Hello, I understand that d-i now uses discover, and that this is therefore a likely place to find someone who would be able to address bugs in the package. There is currently a grave bug against discover for failing to install if /cdrom is

Re: Bug #169264: discover: postinst fails if /cdrom mounted [grave]

2003-08-23 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Martin Sjögren] We were supposed to migrate to discover 2.x, in cooperation with Progeny. There were several blocking issues from a d-i point of view, and I don't know what finally happened. Pere? We are waiting for me to get back to Jeff Licquie with the test results and more problems to be