Joey Hess wrote:
...
We are hoping to process at least 75 of these installation reports
this week, with the help of the larger group of Debian developers,
and so we have written a tutorial that should get developers quickly up
to speed on processing installation reports. You can find
Package: debian-installer-demo
Version: debian-installer sarge
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux eric.placeverte.home 2.4.24-1-686 #1 Wed Feb 4 20:22:14 EST 2004 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Netinst daily build 20040217
Linux debian 2.4.24-1-686-smp #1 SMP Wed Feb 4 21:29:16 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:36:44 +0100
Method: netinst daily build cd, further installation from ftp2.de.debian.org
Machine:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: debian netinst daily 20040217
From current installation
Linux paradigm 2.6.2-paradigm #1 Thu Feb 5 19:59:26 CET 2004 i686 unknown
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:51:32 +0100
Method: Boot from Firewire CD-Rom
Machine: Sony PCG-C1MHP aka
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:01:35PM +0100, Philippe Batailler wrote:
hi,
In file doc/manuel/en/what-is-debian-linux.xml,
one para reads:
For example, Debian was the first Linux distribution to include a
package management system for easy installation and removal of
software.
Then two
Hi-
This appears to have been fixed in the daily build I just downloaded
today, Monday Feb 23 2004.
A different error keeps the install from progressing but is probably
unrelated. I think this bug can be closed.
thanks!
Erik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2004 06:13:53 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#232417: fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :
« This what I see:
«
« mir-CHROOT:/usr/src/debian-installer/doc/manual/en
« # pwd
« /usr/src/debian-installer/doc/manual/en
« mir-CHROOT:/usr/src/debian-installer/doc/manual/en
« # ls
« CVSboot-installer install-methods
On Feb 23, 2004, at 1:45 AM, Derrik Pates wrote:
sebyte wrote:
I have partitioned my hard drive, (using Apple's Disk Utility), as
follows:
As was mentioned in another reply, you shouldn't try to do the
partitioning through Apple's Disk Utility. IMHO, it's terrible, not to
mention it wastes big
On Feb 22, 2004, at 5:26 PM, Seb Tennant wrote:
[...]
Did you burn your .iso image in OS X? If so, how did you do
it so that it would boot from your computer?
Yes I did burn my .iso image to disk in OS X. I used Roxio's Toast
Titanium. I'm not sure why, but Toast often works where Disk
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:01:35PM +0100, Philippe Batailler wrote:
hi,
In file doc/manuel/en/what-is-debian-linux.xml,
one para reads:
For example, Debian was the first Linux distribution to include a
package management system for easy installation and removal of
software.
Then two
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 05:14:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I've updated the d-i ports status page for d-i. Check it out in 4 hours
or so and make sure it's now accurate.
I don't think there's a real point for a floppy version for amiga or
mac. You can't boot from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 233735 debian-installer
Bug#233735: The installer can not find the nic driver (e100.o)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer'.
clone 234322 -1
Bug#234322: installation-reports: HP/Compaq nc6000 Laptop
Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 214491 + pending
Bug#214491: need wireless configure udeb
Tags were: d-i
Bug#225512: netcfg: add wifi configuration
Tags added: pending
tags 224912 + pending
Bug#224912: should check if IP address is well-formed
There were no tags set.
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 234395 wishlist
Bug#234395: Please mention name of eth device
Severity set to `wishlist'.
merge 224662 234395
Bug#224662: Please mention name of eth device
Bug#234395: Please mention name of eth device
Bug#234311: Please mention name of eth
OK, having had my arse kicked by AJ, I'm going to spend a bit of time trying
to get Lart and balloon working with D-I - Can D-I work down a serial
console as primary interface? If not then it's no good on these platforms,
and I'll take a look at riscpc instead.
I had looked at this a while ago,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 234395 wishlist
Bug#234395: Please mention name of eth device
Bug#224662: Please mention name of eth device
Bug#234311: Please mention name of eth device
Severity set to `wishlist'.
merge 234395 224662
Bug#224662: Please mention name of eth
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 234262 -1
Bug#234262: Package: installation-reports
Bug 234262 cloned as bug 234402.
reassign -1 base-installer
Bug#234402: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
retitle -1
Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:41:47 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 233533 lilo-installer
Bug#233533: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lilo-installer'.
clone 233490 -1
Bug#233490: sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Bug 233490 cloned as bug 234407.
reassign -1
floppy-retriever_0.20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
floppy-retriever_0.20.dsc
floppy-retriever_0.20.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_0.20_all.udeb
load-floppy_0.20_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 234262 -1
Bug#234262: Package: installation-reports
Bug 234262 cloned as bug 234412.
reassign -1 debian-installer
Bug#234412: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-installer'.
retitle -1
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:35:18PM +, Wookey wrote:
OK, having had my arse kicked by AJ, I'm going to spend a bit of time trying
to get Lart and balloon working with D-I - Can D-I work down a serial
console as primary interface? If not then it's no good on these platforms,
and I'll take a
Accepted:
floppy-retriever_0.20.dsc
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.20.dsc
floppy-retriever_0.20.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.20.tar.gz
floppy-retriever_0.20_all.udeb
to pool/main/f/floppy-retriever/floppy-retriever_0.20_all.udeb
choose-mirror_0.033_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
choose-mirror_0.033.dsc
choose-mirror_0.033.tar.gz
choose-mirror_0.033_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:30:43 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Accepted:
choose-mirror_0.033.dsc
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.033.dsc
choose-mirror_0.033.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.033.tar.gz
choose-mirror_0.033_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.033_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:33:30 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 233312 Usually it locks up while retrieving a file
Bug#233312: net-installer freezes during base installation
Changed Bug title.
tags 233312 d-i
Bug#233312: Usually it locks up while retrieving a file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 233046 base-installer
Bug#233046: Sarge installer did not finish on a Dell PowerEdge 1750
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-installer'.
retitle 233046 mount: relocation errro:
Bug#233046: Sarge installer did not
I have done a test import of d-i's cvs repository into subversion. The
repository is available for anyone who has commit access to d-i at
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/d-i/trunk or at
svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk for anonymous access, and can also be
browsed with viewcvs at
choose-mirror_0.034_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
choose-mirror_0.034.dsc
choose-mirror_0.034.tar.gz
choose-mirror_0.034_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Wookey wrote:
Do I need to wait for something to get updated (at midnight?) or do I need
adding as a developer to the project to get userid cvs access? If so can
someone do that please? thanx
Done. There is an hourly cron job that updates the groups.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
netcfg_0.46_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.46.dsc
netcfg_0.46.tar.gz
netcfg_0.46_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.46_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.46_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:59:02PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
trunk/
tools/
cdebconf/
build/
branches/
d-i/
beta2
release
tools/
Accepted:
choose-mirror_0.034.dsc
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.034.dsc
choose-mirror_0.034.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.034.tar.gz
choose-mirror_0.034_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_0.034_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.46_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.46_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.46_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.46_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.46.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.46.dsc
netcfg_0.46.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.46.tar.gz
Bastian Blank wrote:
That looks better. I don't know why people love tags/ if they can use
more speaking directories.
Because I might want to tag something that is not a release. Also
because tags is in use in 99% of all subversion repositories out
there, and is in the documentation, and we
Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:32:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#214491: fixed in netcfg 0.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:32:31 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#231106: fixed in netcfg 0.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:32:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#214491: fixed in netcfg 0.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:32:31 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#224912: fixed in netcfg 0.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:32:31 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#231107: fixed in netcfg 0.46
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 232827 installation-reports
quit
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:48:06PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 232827 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386
Bug#232827: Installing kernel image failed
Warning: Unknown package
Denis Barbier wrote:
Translators can hardly know how these text fragments are used and
displayed, a comment for all these text types will certainly be very
helpful.
I've added comments to all the prebaseconfig progress bar stuff.
Got a question for Denis. This kind of minor change tends to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 232827 installation-reports
Bug#232827: Installing kernel image failed
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386' to `installation-reports'.
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 04:35:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Denis Barbier wrote:
Translators can hardly know how these text fragments are used and
displayed, a comment for all these text types will certainly be very
helpful.
I've added comments to all the prebaseconfig progress bar stuff.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:59:02PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
I have done a test import of d-i's cvs repository into subversion. The
repository is available for anyone who has commit access to d-i at
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/d-i/trunk or at
svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk for anonymous access,
Denis Barbier wrote:
Translated manuals rely on cvs revision numbers, as with boot-floppies,
so this change will be pretty painful here. I see 2 solutions:
a) Automatically replace cvs revision numbers of original files in
translated documents with svn revision numbers. Not sure if
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:44:14PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Denis Barbier wrote:
Translated manuals rely on cvs revision numbers, as with boot-floppies,
so this change will be pretty painful here. I see 2 solutions:
a) Automatically replace cvs revision numbers of original files in
Package: installation-reports
I just downloaded beta 2 of the debian-installer from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-neti
nst.iso (from: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/).
I tried to load it up on my laptop and it consistently hangs at
I just downloaded sarge netinst 23/02/04 and booted my Nforce2 system.
The installer did not find my onboard Broadcom chipset and more strangely
/lib/modules/2.4.24-1-386/kernel/drivers doesn't appear to have modules
for *any* network cards!
Has something gone wrong with the nightly builds?
--
Denis Barbier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:44:14PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Denis Barbier wrote:
Translated manuals rely on cvs revision numbers, as with boot-floppies,
so this change will be pretty painful here. I see 2 solutions:
a) Automatically replace cvs revision numbers
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta 2, 100MB, CD image, 14-Jan-2004 From
dbian.org/devel/debian-installer
uname -a: I went back to the woody installer so I don't have this :-(
Date: 2/20/2004 11:00 AM
Method: CD-ROM install, CD-ROM boot, using installer image
Machine:
In light of Colin's post[1] to debian-devel-announce, we need to make
plans for the 15th March deadline that he has set. That is 3 weeks from
today.
In three weeks, we can certianly get another beta (or perhaps release
candidate) out, and we certianly need to given the state of the old one.
I
Dermot Bradley wrote:
I just downloaded sarge netinst 23/02/04 and booted my Nforce2 system.
From exactly what URL, please?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
- Get daily builds working.
Is there anyone with a Netwinder in the Toronto area who wants the Arm
installer to work? I'm willing to hack on it to see if I can bring it
up to speed.
- Make sure the debian-installer package builds
Il mar, 2004-02-24 alle 02:39, Joey Hess ha scritto:
[...]
- Get daily builds working.
Currently working: alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, sparc
Hppa's daily build has been down since the 17th.
Mips needs a daily build.
Powerpc's daily build is failing.
About powerpc, a
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Atari and mvme147 should have netboot targets.
I'm using the term netboot inconsistently on m68k. Ya'll tell me if it
should be changed. Amiga, atari, and mac cannot be tftp booted. So the
netboot target really just loads components and base off the net instead
of a
Hi All,
I just tried the netinst on two machines. With a direct ethernet
connection to the internet, the first went no problems. The second
machine has an ethernet card for a home network, and I wanted to install
over the modem - that was a pain. It wanted to use eth0 for installation,
and
Jeff Bailey wrote:
- USB Keyboard issues
UNKNWON (anyone have a usb keyboard?)
Does this need to be on i386? My ia64 has a usb keyboard that I can
test.
We definitly need to test it on i386, but I think the issue is just
whether hotplug is installed properly or not, which
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il mar, 2004-02-24 alle 02:39, Joey Hess ha scritto:
[...]
- Get daily builds working.
Currently working: alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, sparc
Hppa's daily build has been down since the 17th.
Mips needs a daily build.
Powerpc's daily build is failing.
Dermot Bradley wrote:
Dermot Bradley wrote:
I just downloaded sarge netinst 23/02/04 and booted my Nforce2 system.
From exactly what URL, please?
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/20040223/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
The correct url is under here:
http://gluck.debian.org
Dermot Bradley wrote:
I just downloaded sarge netinst 23/02/04 and booted my Nforce2 system.
From exactly what URL, please?
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/20040223/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
The correct url is under here:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/
The ones you used are known to be broken at this stage in the release
cycle.
Where did you come across the url you used?
Well I saw http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/; mentioned somewhere
and netinst/i386/
* Miroslav Kure [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-23 18:07:50 +0100]:
(BTW, these days every other major distribution offers ported apt-get
or have some similar tool like urpmi. Do you think we should weaken
the wording most distinguishes a bit?)
IMO the biggest feature that distinguishes
As far as I know language-chooser comes before main-menu these days.
Should this bug be closed?
Thanks,
--
Joshua Kwan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi all.
I've read that it is a good idea for the 'root' partition to be small
and bootable, i.e., for it to only include /bin, /dev, /etc, /lib,
/mnt, /root and /sbin. Presumably, as these directories contain
predominantly static files, there is very little chance of a 'root'
partition
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:29:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
Failing that, your b) looks not too bad. One thing that makes it easier
is that due to svn's different versioning method, we only need to record
one number, the current revision of the whole repository after it is
switched to
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 06:03:08AM +, Joshua Kwan wrote:
[...]
Index: changelog
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/tools/languagechooser/debian/changelog,v
retrieving revision 1.202
retrieving revision 1.203
diff -u
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
17. feb. 2004, gluck.debian.org
uname -a:
Linux wombat 2.4.24-1-386 #1 Wed Feb 18 19:44:56 EST 2004 i586 GNU/Linux
Date: 18, feb, 2004
Method:
netinst from ftp.fi.debian.org no proxy booted from businesscard-cd
Machine:
homebrew
72 matches
Mail list logo
