wedlock dragging Pomona brewing readied
Sergio Hoffmann, 25 y.o. psychotherapist, Germany:
I think i'm younkger than main target group of Cialdis consumers, but i
have a very hard work, i always had to listen about people's failures, about bad life et cetera.
gibberish Mitch pivotal
All that
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: March 06,2004 debian-installer built from cvs
sources
uname -a: Linux segdebtst 2.4.21-powerpc-iseries #1 SMP Fri Feb 6 08:50:55 CET 2004
ppc64 GNU/Linux
Date: March 06,2004
Method: boot with initrd, netinstall, sarge, proxy/http
Machine:
Title: burnish warble pigeonberry notoriety gable flu oleomargarine moron camille diminutive stater walden nazi alluvial demurrer strenuous bullhide request main centimeter religious furman masquerade s's accommodate altogether angola coleman caprice albania effectuate gratuitous origin fortnight
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 11:36:48PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On 5.III.2004 at 18:36 Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: partman
Version: 12
Severity: grave
partman is unusable on s390 and blocks completely after issuing a error
about the sector size.
Version 15 of partman prints a
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 10:28:13AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
If someone can provide me information for those partition types, i would
be glad to add support for them to libparted. I cannot test them
obviously though.
s390-tools includes a lib which provides the complete functionality.
Anton,
On 7.III.2004 at 10:28 Sven Luther wrote:
Anton, this afternoon, i will add per subarch information about
partition types for powerpc, can you then make an upload once i have
done that ?
Look at the end of the file definitions.sh from the package partman.
Also, i guess it would be
Hello all,
Would someone please sponsor a new upload of discover-data? This
update includes a variety of fixes, including a major update of the
pcmcia bridge data, which is what around half the bugs we get for this
package are about. The package and everything else is located at
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
At that stage of installation where the user is supposed toedit the
partitiontable, there is no obvious option to accept the existing
partition table. Choosing Go Back and continuing on to mount the
existing filesystems/swap areas works, but is not
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:12:24PM -0900, Joey Hess wrote:
Hmm, depending on the terminal type, it may work to just print one line.
I'm thinking of something like this:
Scanning hardware..10%..20%..30%..40%..50%..
It works at least on the 3215 terminals of a s390.
Bastian
--
A father
Hi folks
Disclaimer: I don't do a deeper look into partman so this may already
work.
This features will be needed by a possible s390 support in partman:
- IBM disklabels (Sven Luther offered to take a look on it) for internal
storage, some other partition type for the FC storage.
- Proper
Hi,
I read this
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=debian-installerver=20040303arch=hppastamp=1078663228file=logas=raw
and to correct this failure, I added a build depends on palo [hppa].
To do this, I was forced to make a new entry in build/debian/changelog.
I hope I did the right thing,
On 7.III.2004 at 12:44 Bastian Blank wrote:
This features will be needed by a possible s390 support in partman:
- IBM disklabels (Sven Luther offered to take a look on it) for internal
storage, some other partition type for the FC storage.
Yes, without this it is very difficult to add
Hello,
When I do an installation from daily build CD, I found that many
Chinese (either Simplified or traditional) characters were still lost.
It's not a new issue. I did ask it in January, but no answer. Is this
just because bterm-unifont didn't include enough characters? Or
another bug to d-i?
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Peter Karbaliotis wrote:
This time it actually got to the point of installing a kernel image.
Unfortunately, the installer chose kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc64-smp when
it should have chosen kernel-image-2.4.24-sparc32.
I think this is fixed in cvs
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 04:23:13AM +1300, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
When I do an installation from daily build CD, I found that many
Chinese (either Simplified or traditional) characters were still lost.
It's not a new issue. I did ask it in January, but no answer. Is this
just because
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:25:21AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
Would someone please sponsor a new upload of discover-data? This
update includes a variety of fixes, including a major update of the
pcmcia bridge data, which is what around half the bugs we get for this
package are about. The
Matt Kraai wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 04:23:13AM +1300, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
When I do an installation from daily build CD, I found that many
Chinese (either Simplified or traditional) characters were still lost.
It's not a new issue. I did ask it in January, but no answer. Is this
Accepted:
debian-installer-demo_20040306_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-demo_20040306_i386.deb
debian-installer_20040306.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040306.dsc
debian-installer_20040306.tar.gz
to
Accepted:
partman-lvm_1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_1.dsc
partman-lvm_1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_1.tar.gz
partman-lvm_1_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_1_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
partman-palo_1.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_1.dsc
partman-palo_1.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_1.tar.gz
partman-palo_1_hppa.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_1_hppa.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
d-i should, as early as possible, set the system date to something
sensibe (or ask the user) if it's too far in the past.
I'd recommend 2004-01-01 as the smallest acceptable system time.
Otherwise, tar will
Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 2004 11:30:11 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#235998: fixed in debian-installer 20040306
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hello,
I put together a noisy config with 2 scsi disks on a dumb scsi controller
on an otherwise homebrew i386 system.
I went through the install with the image provided by
Paul Fleischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
available at http://www.daimi.au.dk/~pg/debian/netinst-raid1.iso
I managed to set
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.44_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.44_m68k.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.44_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.44_powerpc.udeb
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:56:20AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:25:21AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
Would someone please sponsor a new upload of discover-data? This
update includes a variety of fixes, including a major update of the
pcmcia bridge data, which is
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:10:14PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
- Proper recognition of the sector size (see #236325).
I suppose this is not absolutely necessary (acording to the comment of
Sven Luther to this bug report).
It is, because this value is needed for the next point.
- The block
Package: discover
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please add attached Ukrainian (uk) debconf and program translations.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 12:23:48PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On 7.III.2004 at 10:28 Sven Luther wrote:
Anton, this afternoon, i will add per subarch information about
partition types for powerpc, can you then make an upload once i have
done that ?
Look at the end of the file
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 12:44:27PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hi folks
Disclaimer: I don't do a deeper look into partman so this may already
work.
This features will be needed by a possible s390 support in partman:
- IBM disklabels (Sven Luther offered to take a look on it) for internal
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:57:57PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:10:14PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
- Proper recognition of the sector size (see #236325).
I suppose this is not absolutely necessary (acording to the comment of
Sven Luther to this bug report).
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:56:20AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
Is this the first non-NMU that fixes 187110? If not, you
shouldn't use the changelog to close it.
You're right. I didn't make that change and I didn't think about it very
carefully when I saw it. A new version has been uploaded
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:45:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
But where is the value stored ? In the disklabel ? In the partition info ?
Somewhere else ?
In _device_get_sector_size, it properly gets them with BLKSSZGET but
never sets the right value in the PedDevice struct.
Bastian
--
Where
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:44:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, i will do that. Is there any official documentation about this, or
only the s390 tools you spoke about ?
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/docu/lx24jun03dd03.pdf
page 11.
Also, i suppose those
partconf_0.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partconf_0.24.dsc
partconf_0.24.tar.gz
partconf_0.24_i386.udeb
partconf-find-partitions_0.24_i386.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_0.24_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 7.III.2004 at 19:38 Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, so i should create a partman-pegasos package, with some debconf info
stuff called in the postinst ?
I suppose this can be done easier. What are the need of pegasos?
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
partconf_0.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partconf_0.25.dsc
partconf_0.25.tar.gz
partconf_0.25_i386.udeb
partconf-find-partitions_0.25_i386.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_0.25_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Accepted:
partconf-find-partitions_0.25_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-find-partitions_0.25_i386.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_0.25_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-mkfstab_0.25_i386.udeb
partconf_0.25.dsc
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf_0.25.dsc
partconf_0.25.tar.gz
to
Accepted:
partconf-find-partitions_0.24_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-find-partitions_0.24_i386.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_0.24_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-mkfstab_0.24_i386.udeb
partconf_0.24.dsc
to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf_0.24.dsc
partconf_0.24.tar.gz
to
linux-kernel-di_0.45_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+s390+sparc.changes
uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di_0.45.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.45.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.45_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.45_i386.udeb
affs-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.45_m68k.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.45_m68k.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.25-powerpc-di_0.45_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.25-powerpc-di_0.45_powerpc.udeb
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 10:42:27PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On 7.III.2004 at 19:38 Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, so i should create a partman-pegasos package, with some debconf info
stuff called in the postinst ?
I suppose this can be done easier. What are the need of pegasos?
Well, i
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:43:39PM +0100, Simon Vallet wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to try debian-installer on an OldWorld -- as I got
it, the CD won't be bootable, and no floppy images are available.
Jeremie Koenig did some work on old world pmac, i don't know if he got
to finalize it.
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:16:10PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:45:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
But where is the value stored ? In the disklabel ? In the partition info ?
Somewhere else ?
In _device_get_sector_size, it properly gets them with BLKSSZGET but
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 09:08:45PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 07:44:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Yes, i will do that. Is there any official documentation about this, or
only the s390 tools you spoke about ?
Save Money, Buy GENERIC!
Prescription drugs with NO prior prescription needed!
- XANAX - (to treat anxiety)
- PHENTERMINE - (for weight loss)
- Viagra - (got wood?)
- Ambian - (For a Great NightÂ’s Sleep)
- Lipitor - (to reduce cholesterol)
- NEXIUM - (to treat acid reflux and GERD)
- PAXIL
Package: install
Version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso beta 2
Got to the point where it's ready to retrieve packages
via http or ftp and it became apparent that the machine's
ethernet connection was not up. (Had used same manual IP address
configuration to 192.168.7.4 which the machine has always
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Hi!
Can people working on non-i386 tell how we can find the default
partition table type. This is necessary for the autopartitioner of
partman to work on them and will also simplify the dialog for creation
of new partition table.
Currently parted supports the
elijah wright wrote:
- cdebconf should not use translated strings on dumb terminals.
Can you tell why? I know nothing about dumb terminals, googled a bit
but did not find anything interesting. This is not d-i related, but
#232296 discusses whether English text could contain UTF-8
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.dsc
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.tar.gz
discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2_all.udeb
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
Accepted:
discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-2_all.udeb
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.dsc
discover-data_1.2004.02.08-2.tar.gz
to
Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:17:02 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#236347: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:17:02 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#230122: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Debian-installer-version:
7 Mar 2004 (Daily Build)
$ md5sum sarge-i386-netinst.iso
77b65f957d7e1d6ce9edb2e093480efa sarge-i386-netinst.iso
(MD5SUM is okay)
Install Date:
Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:17:02 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#233295: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:17:02 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#234243: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:17:02 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#234950: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:17:02 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#235253: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:17:02 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#235285: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: main-menu
Severity: normal
From an i386 netinst iso (6 march), I install, go back from grub install
and manually pick lilo install. It fails, and lilo-installer exits 10.
Now main-menu apparently crashes; the syslog shows init re-starting the
debian installer, and the screen goes black
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2/28/2004 uname -a: Date: 2/28/2444 1900
Method: How did you install? Network. What did you boot off? Floppies. If
network install, from where? Debian US mirror. Proxied? No.
Masquerade firewall with DHCP server, running
Michael Bonert wrote:
attempt to access beyond end of device
01:00: rw=0, want=820#, limit 8192
Well, this sounds like you have a bad CD or ISO. Try another one.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Autobuild of d-i on ia64 is failing like this, do you know what the
message means?
bdftobogl -b ./tmp/netboot/unifont.bdf tmp/netboot/tree/unifont.bgf.tmp
bogl_write_font failed
make[7]: *** [tmp/netboot/tree/unifont.bgf] Error 1
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 09:47:01PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Autobuild of d-i on ia64 is failing like this, do you know what the
message means?
bdftobogl -b ./tmp/netboot/unifont.bdf tmp/netboot/tree/unifont.bgf.tmp
bogl_write_font failed
make[7]: *** [tmp/netboot/tree/unifont.bgf] Error 1
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:43:12AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
(CC to translators, reply-to to -boot)
Folks, in case you had problems for checking in/checking out, here are
my current crontab entries:
55 19,21,5 * * * cd /home/bubulle/src/debian/d-i/HEAD ; CVS_RSH=ssh cvs -d [EMAIL
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:10:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:43:39PM +0100, Simon Vallet wrote:
I'm currently trying to try debian-installer on an OldWorld -- as I got
it, the CD won't be bootable, and no floppy images are available.
Jeremie, could you make a
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:02:49AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
AFAIH vt102 supports latin1, so most vt100-comaptible terminals
should be suitable for western european languages.
vt100 terminals are not dumb.
Bastian
--
Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love).
66 matches
Mail list logo
