On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 02:40:38AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
(CCing d-boot as I want to make sure I have not misunderstood
anything)
[ Maybe d-i18n is a more appropiate forum, I will not add it to CC: however ]
- /etc/environment is not modified
this is not supposed to be
[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]
for example, a Norwegian school system that is going to be used only
by Norwegian users which will probably not change their language to
'fr' :-)
Actually, such school might want to keep 'fr', as the French teacher
want all pupils to switch to french GUI at the
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2004 09:26:16 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269994: Mounting usb memory sticks fail with 2.6 kernel (no CP437
support)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc1/sarge-=
i386-netinst.iso=20
2004 Aug 6th
uname -a: Linux p4-2400 2.4.26-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 22 12:46:23 JST 2004=20
i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004 Sept 4th
Method: Network install with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 265161 languagechooser
Bug#265161: countrychooser: Should default to sensible option for Country if
information is avaiable
Bug reassigned from package `countrychooser' to `languagechooser'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Hi Joey,
On Friday 20 August 2004 12:51, Joey Hess wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to have the option to mount an USB-stick
early in the process of an i386 netboot installation.
I seem to be overflowing in people asking for this, but none of them
explain *why*
reassign 265161 languagechooser
thanks
The default should be provided by languagechooser, hence reassigning
this bug.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-kernel-di-powerpc_0.61_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc_0.61.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc_0.61.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.27-powerpc-di_0.61_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.27-powerpc-di_0.61_powerpc.udeb
(new) affs-modules-2.4.27-power3-di_0.61_powerpc.udeb extra debian-installer
Amiga filesystem support
This package contains the Amiga filesystem module for the Linux kernel.
(new) affs-modules-2.4.27-power4-di_0.61_powerpc.udeb extra debian-installer
Amiga filesystem support
This package
Package: partman
Version: 54
Severity: minor
'No partitionable media was found.'
should be
'No partitionable media were found.'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 18:44:53 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269554: installation-reports: 20040831 image is broken (kernel)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 02:26:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
It seems that active_partitions/reiserfs/choices still uses
partman-reiserfs/text/options, which was removed earlier. So the script
bombs out before it can give a mount point choice.
I commited the fix.
This all seems very fucked
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 12:06:09 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Should be fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: base-config
Version: 2.44
Tags: d-i
The dialog asking the user whether his system clock is set to local time or
GMT currently displays e.g:
The hardware clock says the time is now Sat 04 Sep 2004 11:16:20 AM UTC
^^^
I
Ognyan Kulev wrote:
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
Ognyan Kulev :
How KOI8-R is setup
for stage 2, so that we make CP1251 to be setup in the same way?
Add test for CP1251 in termwrap, or remove all the tests for languages
that have kbd or cyr entries in languagelist.
I've cloned the KOI8-R entry in
On 06 2004 10:14, Javier Fernndez-Sanguino Pea wrote:
You mean install time here I guess
yes my mistake.
There are several situations which might cam around that make it
useful being in localization-config:
1.- The sysadmin has not defined a language on installation and
thus,
hi all,
I use Debian for 4 years now and there's no worth to say to you that I find this system GREAT. I thank all Debian developpers for that. I want in my turn to give the litle that I can to help Debian and improve it. I'm not a very good programmer. I just understand how some language works
hi all,
I use Debian for 4 years now and there's no worth to say to you that I find this system GREAT. I thank all Debian developpers for that. I want in my turn to give the litle that I can to help Debian and improve it. I'm not a very good programmer. I just understand how some language works
pe, 2004-09-03 kello 12:20, Christian Perrier kirjoitti:
reassign 269734 discover1
thanks
Quoting Mika S Marjamäki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I'm trying to install Sarge with daily netboot images on i386 platform.
I need 3w-9xxx module for my
Doing 'modprobe 3w-9xxx' manually helps. I couldn't find the pspci
utility, but here's the output of 'lspci -n -s 01:03.0':
Type, I meant lspci. lspci -v would help
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Jaonary Rabarisoa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
hi all,
I use Debian for 4 years now and there's no worth to say to you that I
find this system GREAT. I thank all Debian developpers for that. I want
in my turn to give the litle that I can to help Debian and improve it.
I'm not a very
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: partman
Version: 54
Severity: minor
'No partitionable media was found.'
should be
'No partitionable media were found.'
Hmmm, you're right. English uses singular for one only (see
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: partman
Version: 54
Severity: minor
'No partitionable media was found.'
should be
'No partitionable media were found.'
After a long debate on IRC:
Kamion bubulle: no medium is definitively singular.
Kamion bubulle: no media would
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 270225 pending
Bug#270225: Minor error in 'No partitionable media' dialog
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 270225 pending
thanks
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: partman
Version: 54
Severity: minor
'No partitionable media was found.'
should be
'No partitionable media were found.'
Change made (translation unfuzzied)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
I downloaded iso-images of the srage release and tried
to install them on my PII 333Mhz, 128Mb, 2x15Gb SCSI
Harddisks (Win 2000 is installed on Disk 1), IDE-CD
Rom.
I have some experience with suse 8.2 on disk 2 and
everything (including Grub) work fine.
So I wanted to give Sarge a try and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: discover1
Version:1.6.5
I have two machines with SID (one laptop and one desktop) and
discover1 doesn't setup the cdroms anymore?
There's only a symlink in the /media directory but the symlink points
to nothing? (/media/cdrom - is
the
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: netinst rc1 ISO, downloaded from debian.org
on Sept. 3, 2004
uname -a: n/a
Date: Sept. 3, 2004
Method: Booted from CD-ROM with netinst rc1 ISO. Didn't get far
enough to use network install.
Machine: Dell Inspiron 2650c
Processor: Intel
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 02:26:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
It seems that active_partitions/reiserfs/choices still uses
partman-reiserfs/text/options, which was removed earlier. So the script
bombs out before it can give a mount point choice.
I commited the fix.
Using the new
nobootloader_0.0.22_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nobootloader_0.0.22.dsc
nobootloader_0.0.22.tar.gz
nobootloader_0.0.22_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Rejected: Unknown distribution `UNRELEASED'.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to this email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hang on, Frans (and others !), I now understand why having a default country for each
language is really not easyand also why it works with French and
not with Dutch (after making a small change to languagechooser for
putting a default country for all languages)
All this is because the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
reassign 269734 discover1-data
Bug#269734: debian-installer: 3w-9xxx module not autodetected
Bug reassigned from package `discover1' to `discover1-data'.
End of message, stopping
Andreas Tille wrote:
Andreas Tille wrote:
# fdisk /dev/hda
Unable to open /dev/hda
# cfdisk /dev/hda
FATAL ERROR: Cannot open disk drive
The debian installer uses devfs.
Well that means exactly what if it does not detect the harddisk? It only
means
that my manual intervention
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
reassign 269630 partman-reiserfs
Bug#269630: Installation Report amd64(gcc-3.2)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman-reiserfs'.
severity 269630 serious
([EMAIL PROTECTED] may be an amusing reply-to, but it is not appropriate
for this list. A great many posters on this list are not subscribers and
I CC anyone I do not know is a subscriber.)
John Summerfield wrote:
I've just submitted two kernel bug reports that have the potential to be
Frans Pop wrote:
The dialog asking the user whether his system clock is set to local time or
GMT currently displays e.g:
The hardware clock says the time is now Sat 04 Sep 2004 11:16:20 AM UTC
I can't reproduce this. The command run to get the time is this:
hwclock --show --localtime | awk
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: rc1 businesscard and netinst images
uname -a: Linux boxname 2.6.7-1-i386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 9/6/04 AM sometime
Method: Booted from both Netinst and businesscard images. Attempted network install
from
nobootloader_0.0.22_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
nobootloader_0.0.22.dsc
nobootloader_0.0.22.tar.gz
nobootloader_0.0.22_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
nobootloader_0.0.22.dsc
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.22.dsc
nobootloader_0.0.22.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.22.tar.gz
nobootloader_0.0.22_all.udeb
to pool/main/n/nobootloader/nobootloader_0.0.22_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 270304 netcfg
Bug#270304: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'.
retitle 270304 Instructions for entering wlan key should be clearer
Bug#270304: Package: installation-reports
Changed Bug
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Using the new partman and partman-reiserfs udebs I could set a
mount point even for reiserfs. But there were 2 problems:
- I still got an error popup saying that the root filesystem
is not specified.
Me too.
- The partman menu for reiserfs asked for a label, so for
On Monday 06 September 2004 19:53, Joey Hess wrote:
AfAIK hwclock output never includes the timezone.
I'm afraid it does.
On a system installed with LANG=en_US (on which I based my report):
# hwclock --show --localtime | awk '{NF-=2; print $0}'
Mon 06 Sep 2004 09:00:31 PM CEST
On a system
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Using the new partman and partman-reiserfs udebs I could set a
mount point even for reiserfs. But there were 2 problems:
- I still got an error popup saying that the root filesystem
is not specified.
Recent changes to partman-reiserfs's fstab.d broke it. The script
partman-basicfilesystems_33_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_33.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_33.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_33_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Joey Hess wrote:
Apparently it only lets you change the label is the partition is marked
to be formatted. Probably because the tools in the installer are only able
to do so at format time. If you choose to keep the data on the parition,
it won't let you change the label.
mkreiserfs is pretty fast,
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 15:47:49 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#270138: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 33
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_33.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_33.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_33.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_33.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_33_all.udeb
to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
reassign 270304 netcfg
Bug#270304: Instructions for entering wlan key should be clearer
Bug reassigned from package `netcfg' to `netcfg'.
retitle 270304 wep key entry unclear
partman-xfs_19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-xfs_19.dsc
partman-xfs_19.tar.gz
partman-xfs_19_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Apparently it only lets you change the label is the partition is marked
to be formatted. Probably because the tools in the installer are only able
to do so at format time. If you choose to keep the data on the parition,
it won't let you change the
Hey translators and translation interested people,
after some delay, I managed to update the status page(s) for
debian-installer translation work. The scripts are now level-based, no
stages anymore.
Using them is quite the same as before:
Instead of:
zipl-installer_0.0.4_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zipl-installer_0.0.4.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.4.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.4_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:30:12 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Accepted:
partman-xfs_19.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_19.dsc
partman-xfs_19.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_19.tar.gz
partman-xfs_19_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_19_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to
Accepted:
zipl-installer_0.0.4.dsc
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.4.dsc
zipl-installer_0.0.4.tar.gz
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.4.tar.gz
zipl-installer_0.0.4_s390.udeb
to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.4_s390.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
The recent changes to partman after rc1 have introduced a lot of bugs
that have been found over the past week. This has included the various
problems with it not finding drives that everyone saw, and also problems
with reiserfs and xfs support being broken. I'm worried that there are
more new bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
reassign 269809 debian-installer
Bug#269809: ICH4 IDE hard disk not being detected
Bug reassigned from package `hw-detect' to `debian-installer'.
End of message, stopping processing
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: rc1 (20040801 from
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/rc1/images/floppy/)
uname -a: Linux sheratan 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004
i686 unknown
Date: 6. Sept. 2004
Method: floppy
Machine: IBM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 06 September 2004 22:55, Joey Hess wrote:
So this is a call for anyone who can to test partman in the daily
builds. We need to not only do automated partitioning tests, but manual
partitioning and try all the little nooks and corners and
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2004 17:20:02 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dennis,
On Thursday 19 August 2004 18:26, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
as you might know, some packages related to the debian-installer are in
section base and are frozen due to the process of releasing sarge in the
next weeks. Thus, no changes to
Frans Pop wrote:
How do you want test results reported? I don't think normal installation
reports in this case (hard to organize).
Maybe just specific bugreports against partman? I think that would make it
easier to check if a problem has already been reported as well.
Yes obviously just
ddetect_1.05_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_1.05.dsc
ddetect_1.05.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.05_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_1.05_all.udeb
hw-detect_1.05_i386.udeb
archdetect_1.05_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 17:47:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#267402: fixed in ddetect 1.05
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 17:47:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#262638: fixed in ddetect 1.05
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hw-detect-full_1.05_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says
optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Accepted:
archdetect_1.05_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_1.05_i386.udeb
ddetect_1.05.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_1.05.dsc
ddetect_1.05.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_1.05.tar.gz
ethdetect_1.05_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_1.05_all.udeb
Jan Harnisch wrote:
Originally, I intended to boot this Laptop from floppy and access the
install DVD inside my desktop PC via NFS (the Laptop does not have any
drives installed; only a floppy drive in the UltraBase). Unfortunately,
I had to see that there is apparently no way to access a
rootskel_0.92_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_0.92.dsc
rootskel_0.92.tar.gz
rootskel_0.92_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.92_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.92_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.92_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.92_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.92_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.92_i386.udeb
rootskel_0.92.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.92.dsc
rootskel_0.92.tar.gz
to
discover1_1.6.6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.6.6.dsc
discover1_1.6.6.tar.gz
discover1_1.6.6_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.6.6_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.6.6_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.6.6_i386.deb
discover1-udeb_1.6.6_i386.udeb
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 19:17:22 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#261825: fixed in discover1 1.6.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 19:17:22 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269206: fixed in discover1 1.6.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 19:17:22 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269960: fixed in discover1 1.6.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
discover1-udeb_1.6.6_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.6.6_i386.udeb
discover1_1.6.6.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.6.6.dsc
discover1_1.6.6.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.6.6.tar.gz
discover1_1.6.6_i386.deb
to
Joey Hess wrote:
([EMAIL PROTECTED] may be an amusing reply-to, but it is not appropriate
for this list. A great many posters on this list are not subscribers and
I CC anyone I do not know is a subscriber.)
A great number of folk CC me without regard for what they know about me.
It stands.
John Summerfield wrote:
A great number of folk CC me without regard for what they know about me.
It stands.
And you don't even set a proper Mail-Followup-To.
plonk
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
preseed_0.03_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
preseed_0.03.dsc
preseed_0.03.tar.gz
network-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
file-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
lowmem_1.03_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lowmem_1.03.dsc
lowmem_1.03.tar.gz
lowmem_1.03_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_1.03_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
anna_1.02_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
anna_1.02.dsc
anna_1.02.tar.gz
load-installer_1.02_all.udeb
anna_1.02_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
iso-scan_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
iso-scan_1.01.dsc
iso-scan_1.01.tar.gz
iso-scan_1.01_all.udeb
load-iso_1.01_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
file-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/file-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
network-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/preseed/network-preseed_0.03_all.udeb
preseed_0.03.dsc
to pool/main/p/preseed/preseed_0.03.dsc
preseed_0.03.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/preseed/preseed_0.03.tar.gz
Accepted:
iso-scan_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.01.dsc
iso-scan_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.01.tar.gz
iso-scan_1.01_all.udeb
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_1.01_all.udeb
load-iso_1.01_all.udeb
to pool/main/i/iso-scan/load-iso_1.01_all.udeb
Announcing to
Accepted:
anna_1.02.dsc
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_1.02.dsc
anna_1.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_1.02.tar.gz
anna_1.02_i386.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/anna_1.02_i386.udeb
load-installer_1.02_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/anna/load-installer_1.02_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank
Accepted:
lowmem_1.03.dsc
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.03.dsc
lowmem_1.03.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.03.tar.gz
lowmem_1.03_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmem_1.03_all.udeb
lowmemcheck_1.03_i386.udeb
to pool/main/l/lowmem/lowmemcheck_1.03_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
lowmemcheck_1.03_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the
Joey Hess wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
A great number of folk CC me without regard for what they know about me.
It stands.
And you don't even set a proper Mail-Followup-To.
Settle down Joey. AFAIK my MUA doesn't offer the facility. It does allow
me to make a choice that reduces the
base-installer_1.05_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.05.dsc
base-installer_1.05.tar.gz
base-installer_1.05_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
debian-installer-utils_1.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.04.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.04.tar.gz
di-utils-reboot_1.04_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.04_all.udeb
di-utils_1.04_all.udeb
cdrom-detect_1.01_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.01.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.01.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.01_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
bugreporter-udeb_1.00_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bugreporter-udeb_1.00.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_1.00.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_1.00_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 248037 + fixed
Bug#248037: package-versions is extremly slow
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 265612 + fixed
Bug#265612: confusing message
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 21:02:07 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269935: fixed in partman-reiserfs 19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 21:02:02 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269804: fixed in base-installer 1.05
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2004 21:02:07 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269935: fixed in partman-reiserfs 19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
partman-reiserfs_19.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_19.dsc
partman-reiserfs_19.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_19.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_19_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_19_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
Accepted:
cdrom-detect_1.01.dsc
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.01.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.01.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.01.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.01_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.01_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to
Accepted:
bugreporter-udeb_1.00.dsc
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_1.00.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_1.00.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_1.00.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_1.00_all.udeb
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_1.00_all.udeb
Announcing to
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
