Your message dated Wed, 10 May 2006 12:01:58 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#366653: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:38:31PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Hey all,
As I suspect you're all already aware, on 27th April, Sven Luther asked
me to review the situation with d-i and powerpc as a result of finding
his commit access to the d-i repository had been removed. Having spent
some
On 16:38 Wed 10 May , Anthony Towns wrote:
Frans has already indicated he and Colin should be able to commit any
patches Sven sends along in a reasonably timely fashion; and I'm hopeful
that the structured cooperation via NMUs and the BTS should provide some
practice so that you guys can
Hey all,
As I suspect you're all already aware, on 27th April, Sven Luther asked
me to review the situation with d-i and powerpc as a result of finding
his commit access to the d-i repository had been removed. Having spent
some time since then seeing what's been going on, I've concluded that
I get the same error on Ubuntu 5.10 as well.
I have tried with a different type of compact flash card and get the
same error.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:25:32PM +0200, Xavier Oswald wrote:
In any case working with less tension should be done.
But do you think, it's interesting for Sven to work in this way.
What's interesting for Sven isn't really a consideration, what's
reasonable and efficient is. Once this has been
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:42:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:25:32PM +0200, Xavier Oswald wrote:
In any case working with less tension should be done.
But do you think, it's interesting for Sven to work in this way.
What's interesting for Sven isn't really a
There's likely to be more information in /var/log/syslogafter this error pops
up.
Yes, it says grub could not be found (was hard to find)! I used netinst CD
image, then the first testing CD image (grud**.deb is actually in both) but I
have the exact same problem..
Mmmm, another amd64 ...
Oh, I forgot to say that I'm using only i386 images to install (on an AMD64
plateform yes !).
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:09:07PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mmmm, another amd64 ...
Oh, I forgot to say that I'm using only i386 images to install
(on an AMD64 plateform yes !).
And how works an AMD64 installer on a AMD64?
Your feedback is appreciated.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
--
Package: installation-report
Severity: important
I'm trying to use the Debian Installer etch beta 2 to install systems
within a fairly tightly firewalled network.
Although the installer prompts to ask what repository it should use for
the main packages it then tries to use a hard-coded source
And how works an AMD64 installer on a AMD64 ?
I'll try and tell you (USB booting with hd-media/boot.img.gz only, I'm against
the CD's theory..)
Tonight if I have enough time : my playing with i386 installer broke some part
of my system hard disk partition table. No files lost, I'm just
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:58:35PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how works an AMD64 installer on a AMD64 ?
I'll try and tell you
Nice! I'll be happy with just one copy to the mailinglist
(no need to CC me ;-)
(USB booting with hd-media/boot.img.gz only, I'm against the CD's
reassign 366441 debian-installer
tag 366441 pending
thanks
This is not a problem in mklibs but in d-i.
The d-i (the Makefile) fails to tell mklibs to check libs with a name
*.so.* for symbols that are needed.
The patch below in the Makefile fixes this.
--- build/Makefile (revision 37141)
2006/5/9, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a consistent mapping of device names for disk drives
problem.
The disk drive is mapped as sdb during the installation step but sda
when the real system boots up.
I suggest you switch to VT2 at the very end of the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 366441 debian-installer
Bug#366441: Mklibs: should not remove symbol iconv_open
Bug reassigned from package `mklibs' to `debian-installer'.
tag 366441 pending
Bug#366441: Mklibs: should not remove symbol iconv_open
Tags were: d-i
Tags added:
Anthony Towns wrote:
I expect we'll shortly need to look seriously into getting a few more
people actively working on maintaining the powerpc port as well; at the
moment we seem to be relying on Sven to do everything, and that's not
really ideal.
Well, Colin has been doing work on powerpc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's likely to be more information in /var/log/syslogafter this
error pops up.
Yes, it says grub could not be found (was hard to find)! I used
netinst CD image, then the first testing CD image (grud**.deb is
actually in both) but I have the exact same problem..
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-10 16:18]:
There's also an offer from Daniel Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] to help
in an assisting role, mostly on oldworld. Noone has replied to that mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] yet though.
To be fair, Sven responded to it.
--
Martin Michlmayr
John Winters wrote:
I'm trying to use the Debian Installer etch beta 2 to install systems
within a fairly tightly firewalled network.
Although the installer prompts to ask what repository it should use for
the main packages it then tries to use a hard-coded source (presumably
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
reassign 366715 apt-setup
Bug#366715: installation-report: Installer gets stuck if it can't access
security.debian.org
Bug reassigned from package `installation-report' to
After spending some time trying to switch g-i as to use ttf-dejavu as
default font, I'm writing down the infos I collected so far hoping
someone will help getting it to work.
The current set of fonts uses ttf-freefont as default and a very old
version of dejavu font (IIRC something lik 2.2); for
FYI: The status of the installation-guide source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20060102
Current version: 20060427
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 16:38 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
John Winters wrote:
I'm trying to use the Debian Installer etch beta 2 to install systems
within a fairly tightly firewalled network.
Although the installer prompts to ask what repository it should use for
the main packages it then
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Network, netinst CD image
Image version: etch beta 2
Date: 7th May 2006 17:25
Machine: Custom built by woc.co.uk
Processor: Intel P4 630
Memory: 1G
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred
FilesystemType 1K-blocks
The benefits I can think of from commenting out apt-src lines are:
- Faster installation time, doesn't have to download Sources.gz.
- Marginally faster apt-get update time. Now that apt in unstable uses
diffs, this is unlikely to be worth commenting them out even for
dialup users.
- Slightly
I'm thinking it might be good to run apt with a shorter timeout for http
connections the first time apt-setup runs. The default timeout is 120
seconds. A 60 second timeout would probably work here, I'm not sure how
low it could go before giving bad results.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:19:49PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's likely to be more information in /var/log/syslogafter this
error pops up.
Yes, it says grub could not be found (was hard to find)! I used
netinst CD image, then the first testing CD image (grud**.deb
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:00:39PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
Using the current version of ttf-dejavu (2.4.1-1) the frontend crashes
when dejavu is set as default font but if freefont is set as default font,
all languages displayed via dejavu 2.4.1-1 just work fine.
if it can be of any help I
David Härdeman wrote:
Not my bug report, but I'm seeing similar error messages...
I have no idea if you're seeing the same problem as the thread head, but
I've reproduced your problem and filed a bug report on nfs-common to get
it fixed.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Something like the attached patch should suffice. Is it acceptable?
Index: debian/postinst
===
--- debian/postinst (revision 37157)
+++ debian/postinst (working copy)
@@ -330,6 +330,8 @@
major=$(grep
John Winters wrote:
1) Ask before attempting to get security updates. (Obviously default to
yes).
There's no good reason to ask.
Well, no - clearly there is a good reason to ask.
If the machine is network connected it
should make every possible effort to use security
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
tags 366715 wontfix
Bug#366715: installation-report: Installer gets stuck if it can't access
security.debian.org
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
End of message, stopping
Hi,
A new version of parted is about ready to enter testing and should do so
to clear the way for a next parted upload that has a bit more impact,
including an ABI change.
Otavio (as parted maintainer) is OK with the migration.
The current version of parted in unstable adds RAID support for
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
tags 366715 wontfix
Bug#366715: installation-report: Installer gets stuck if it can't access
security.debian.org
There
Quoting Shane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello list,
Has anyone had luck installing Sarge on an Intel i945
chipset. The linux26 target isn't picking up the ethernet
controller, I tried e1000 but that doesn't seem to be it
and it also doesn't detect the connected SATA disks. I
believe it's an
36 matches
Mail list logo
