Rick Thomas wrote:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/
powerpc/iso-cd/
shows images from 2:14 AM August 31.
Is there something going on that is preventing the daily ISOs from
being posted?
Yes, the build machine's power supply died, I think it's been
Your message dated Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:30:42 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line 381960 done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:34:26AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Recently, .zsync files started showing up in the daily cdimage
directory.
This is very nice. The zsync program is loads easier to use(*) than
jigdo, and provides almost as much savings in download time/bandwidth.
Would it be
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:37:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 08:39:36 +0200, Christian Perrier
Can you run (lspci ; lspci -n)|sort on that machine
Then send us the output relevant to your NIC and
the interface your CD is attached on.
[ I don't understand the
Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using an alternative
I install two gconf defaults files, one containing this (save the
markers):
Well all good here but then on d-i side we'll need to configure the
default one?
--
O T A V I
Hello!
I am looking for a BF2.6... eg a bf2.4 - 2.6
Is this possible to find it?
Or does I have to upgrade after installation??
A second question is
Where can I find floppy install for BF2.4?
Thanks in advance
JL
--
JEAN-LUC CONOTTE
INFORMATICIEN
CENTRE D'INFORMATIQUE POUR LA
2006-09-03 (일), 18:51 +0200, Davide Viti 쓰시길:
Hi,
bugs #368300 and #368329 affect Czech/Slovak and Korean respectively.
Since the bugs were filed there were big changes in g-i:
* new libraries made it into the Debian archives
* ttf-cjk-compact-udeb (1.5) was recently uploaded
It'd be
I believe it is time to drop discover1-data as a separate package, and
instead generate it using the information in the discover-data
package. The information in discover-data is at the moment more
correct than the information in discover1-data (I've merged in all the
hardware mappings, and
Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As the discover1-data package is maintained by debian-boot, with David
Nusinow, Gaudenz Steinlin, Joshua Kwan, Otavio Salvador and myself
listed as co-maintainers, I thought it best to bring it up here first.
Any protests?
Not by me. We can do
Christian Perrier wrote :
Then it doesn't even boot
No idea...:) Hopefully other people will be more helpful.
I have found the problem :-) This was my fault : bad configurations
at the SCSI controller (wrong boot ID and no auto-spinning for
the new boot device). I had neatly optimized my
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.54
Severity: wishlist
The Debian GIS subproject is working to package and integrated the
free GIS tools to make them easily available and ready for
professional use. To make the tools easier to find, I believe it
would be useful if there were a GIS workstation task
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: floppy
Image version: etch beta 3 release
Date: 05.09.2006
Machine:
Processor:
Memory:
Partitions:
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot
Hi.
This bug is being reported by apt-listbugs when I attempt to upgrade
busybox,
even though the bug has been fixed already. Please udate the status of this
bug accordingly.
Thanks in advance.
--
Robert Miesen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi all,
I've had another detailed look at partman-auto-crypto tonight.
(/people/alphix-guest/partman-auto-crypto) Quick summary: The
package seems solid from my tests and review of the code; I
think it's ready to move to trunk/ and have a first upload after
two points are solved.
Thanks to
Hi all,
forwarding from Bug#385446 to the list as I think not everyone
follows qa.debian.org bugs. :-)
Without having thought about it very deeply, I think Jeroen has a
good point. Is it perhaps time to establish an udeb policy and/or
update policy to reflect udeb packaging?
Please CC [EMAIL
Hi,
Here are bits from my (nightly) PPPoE tests with d-i.
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 03:06:45AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
Then tell me if things improve? With logs, if not.
Same problem with debconf error.
I retry/retry/retry with apt-install ppp || true patch and I
was wrong, it is not
Em Mon, 04 Sep 2006 09:46:10 -0300
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using an alternative
I install two gconf defaults files, one containing this (save the
markers):
Well all good
Hi Nobel.
When you will upgrade from 2.4 to
2.6 you need to add one line your GRUB/LILO .
initrd and /path ..
For that you need to generate the initrd
image also.
So add this line and reboot it.
Thanks
Deepak Tripathi
-Original Message-
From: datatek
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:00:23 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#163501: Please update the status of this bug to closed or
done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:00:23 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#163501: Please update the status of this bug to closed or
done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:00:23 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#163501: Please update the status of this bug to closed or
done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:00:23 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#163501: Please update the status of this bug to closed or
done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 07:00:23 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#163501: Please update the status of this bug to closed or
done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
23 matches
Mail list logo
