> When the debian-cd actually say it is okay,
> then it is worth to announce Etch RC1 on debian-announce.
Oh, I'm pretty sure that there are tons of other things to do before
that and I would certainly not say that we should do it. The only
person who can currently say this is Frans. And he will
> problems with all install modes:
> - Cannot select British English and a Dvorak keyboard layout (either
>standard or converted to British layout). Ubuntu has a 'type some
>keys to guess the layout' option which is nice, but being able to
>select it in at least expert mode would be go
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 02:51:52AM +0100, Allan Wiinholt Foght wrote:
>
> Partitions: 2*320 GB (Raid 1),
> Well my problem is that the system do not support Raid on the installation
> cd, I have drivers for the raid, but do not know how to install the driver
> (raid driver) at boot time. So my s
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://mirrors.telianet.dk/pub/mirrors/cdimage.debian.org/3.1_r3/i386/iso-cd/
Date: 05. november 2006
Machine: Shuttle SB36
Processor: Intel 4, 3.4Ghz
Memory: 2 GB memory (Dual)
Partitions: 2*320 GB (Raid 1),
Output of lspci and lspci
Package: installation-reportsBoot method: networkImage version: d-i Etch rc1 image from http://www.slug-firmware.net/ (for the internal netcard driver)
Date: 7. nov 2006Machine: Linksys NSLU2. Processor: XScale-IXP42x Family rev 1 (v5l)Memory: 30080 (32MB)Partitions: FilesystemType 1K-blocks
FYI: The status of the partman-efi source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 10
Current version: 11
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
To U
FYI: The status of the elilo-installer source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.6
Current version: 1.7
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:24:42PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
>Op 06-11-2006 om 07:12 schreef Christian Perrier:
>>
>> Did this weekly CD build succeed as expected?
>
>The "weekly" build that I yesterdag (sunday) fetched,
>did boot and made an identifiable DHCP request :-)
Yep; the full build
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst CD image
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 4th of November 2006
Machine: Micromaxx
Processor: P4 2.6 Ghz
Memory: 512 MB
Partitions: hda4 (primary par
Op 04-11-2006 om 08:51 schreef Geert Stappers:
> I encounter
>
> |[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]:/usr/src/debian-installer/packages/rootskel-gtk/src/lib/debian-installer.d
> |$ svn update
> |Alioth undergoing migration:
> |http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/10/msg00025.html
> |svn: Connectio
Op 06-11-2006 om 07:12 schreef Christian Perrier:
> > Updated release planning
> >
> > I will be traveling most of 5 and 6 Nov, so that will influence the
> > release schedule somewhat.
> >
> > 2 Nov Final build and upload of d-i
> > 3 Nov Switch links for daily C
Package: installation-guide
Severity: minor
Hi,
while updating the d-i manual, I found a changing which
seems somewhat accidently (in ../boot-installer/trouble.xml
line 240):
"If you are having the installation stall at a particular floppy,
the first thing you should write it to a
differen
Andrew Leach wrote:
> I can confirm that the above bug is not fixed in version 20061103 of images
> taken from http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/
I don't reproduce it with the 2006-11-05 build.
PS, the preseed file you attached seems to be for sarge, not etch.
--
see shy
Jens Peter Secher wrote:
> But that is not the problem. The above command works fine for me.
> But apparently not for the installer. As mentioned in the original
> bug report, I think that the installer forgets to add a " | cut -d' '
> -f 2" at the end of that command such that the result is "i38
Package: installation-report
Severity: important
Trying to install Etch with the daily netinst CDs on a Dell X200
problems with all install modes:
- Cannot select British English and a Dvorak keyboard layout (either
standard or converted to British layout). Ubuntu has a 'type some
keys to
Le lundi 06 novembre 2006 14:51, Attilio Fiandrotti a écrit :
> > How does it need to be fixed? Won't using different signal fix the issue?
> >
>
> Using different signals should fix up this specific crash, but basing on
> this BR [1] by colin watson cdebconf's signal handling mechanism is not
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Le lundi 06 novembre 2006 12:55, Attilio Fiandrotti a écrit :
Jerome, if i provide a simple patch for DFB 0.9.25, could you please
rebuild the libdirectfb-udeb and see if the crash is fixed?
In this case we could backport the fix from DFB 1.0-rc2 to DFB 0.9.25:
would thi
Le lundi 06 novembre 2006 12:55, Attilio Fiandrotti a écrit :
> Jerome, if i provide a simple patch for DFB 0.9.25, could you please
> rebuild the libdirectfb-udeb and see if the crash is fixed?
> In this case we could backport the fix from DFB 1.0-rc2 to DFB 0.9.25:
> would this be possible if
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I like the idea while I keep in my mind that Joey had some reasons to
>> dislike the udeb building from kernel source. I don't remember which
>
> He dislikes it, because he then will have less control over the .udeb content.
> But the one archive-per-kern
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:27:10AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > Yeah. You know we stopped doing this kind of stuff for the kernel
> >> > package over
> >> > a year ago, and probably for a reason, don't you think ?
> >>
> >> We stopped doing th
Jérôme Marant wrote:
I ran a lot of them and I could switch back and forth from vt1 to vt7. Nothing
crashed at all.
BTW, Looking at the strace output, the problem could come from signal usage,
like you said.
Jerome, thanks for testing: the idea i got is that DFB is not
responsable for cras
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Yeah. You know we stopped doing this kind of stuff for the kernel package
>> > over
>> > a year ago, and probably for a reason, don't you think ?
>>
>> We stopped doing that for kernel packages. The problem here is that,
>> without doing that the bin
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:05:24AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Maybe the installer kernel would have the release version on the
> >> package name and then it wouldn't be remove from the suite until the
> >> next version. e.g:
> >>
> >> - linux-i
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Maybe the installer kernel would have the release version on the
>> package name and then it wouldn't be remove from the suite until the
>> next version. e.g:
>>
>> - linux-image-d-i-4.0-rc1
>
> So you prefer ugly hacked solution over cleant and neat on
24 matches
Mail list logo
