Loïc Minier wrote:
snip/
Because keymap reloading may be a common issue for other gtk/dfb based
apps, i think a reasonable way to proceed is adding a
gdk_directfb_keymap_reload()
Would there be a X11 equivalent for this? I'm not sure I agree Gdk
needs to gain a directfb specific
Your message dated Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:28:58 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#429985: PPC installer kernel panic from libc problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Monday 02 July 2007 09:34, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
A reasonable improvement over current situation could prbably be
setting TRUE a boolean d-i/keymap_changed question from within the
keymap-chooser everytime the console keymap is updated.
This could be an option, but using debconf for
Hi Anton,
On Friday 27 April 2007 15:04, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
The second stage is the full deployment of the udebs of console-setup.
Currently these udebs are disabled but I can enable them as soon as
you tell me.
Could you enable these udebs again, preferably including the changes that
Hi,
We were talking at Debconf about switching Debian to console-setup by
default. Naturally this would involve turning the udeb support back on,
but we were also a bit concerned that this would be another critical
component of d-i that isn't in the d-i svn repository, which can make
maintenance
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
The core of the problem is not detecting the keymap change at the toolkit
level (which is unimportant in our case) but rather informing the windowing
system (DirectFB in our case) that the keymap has to be updated to match
the console one set
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
The core of the problem is not detecting the keymap change at the toolkit
level (which is unimportant in our case) but rather informing the windowing
system (DirectFB in our case) that the keymap has to be updated to match
the
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:59:43AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2007 15:04, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
The second stage is the full deployment of the udebs of console-setup.
Currently these udebs are disabled but I can enable them as soon as
you tell me.
Could you enable these
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 04:01:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 30 June 2007 14:15, Christian Perrier wrote:
- The configuration of the Logical Volume Manager is aborted.
+ The Logical Volume Manager configuration has been aborted.
IMO this is not an improvement.
It's definitely an
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 02 July 2007 09:34, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
A reasonable improvement over current situation could prbably be
setting TRUE a boolean d-i/keymap_changed question from within the
keymap-chooser everytime the console keymap is updated.
This could be an option, but
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 01:10:34PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Basing on answers from Colin and Loic, I've applied a patch (r47807)
which compiles in DirectFB specific code only if DI_UDEB was set at
compile time.
This is a first step in having cdebconf building against gtk/x11 too,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 431204 debian-installer
Bug#431204: Enabling 'quiet' kernel option for D-I images
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-wedge' to `debian-installer'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Monday 02 July 2007 10:39, Colin Watson wrote:
It's definitely an improvement, but maybe not as much as it could be.
I'd say:
Logical Volume Manager configuration has been aborted.
Sounds much better to me. Committed, along with (in partman-md):
- The configuration of RAID has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 431204 + pending
Bug#431204: Enabling 'quiet' kernel option for D-I images
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 431204 - pending
Bug#431204: Enabling 'quiet' kernel option for D-I images
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hello,
Frans Pop wrote:
Let me also use this opportunity to remind the Debian PowerPC community
that are still looking for people willing to get involved more in the
installer for PowerPC and help us deal with port-specific issues.
In this case, this bug report from Peter was the first
Your message dated Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:04:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Enabling 'quiet' kernel option for D-I images
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
reassign 431204 debian-installer
thanks
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 06:32:31PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Package: kernel-wedge
Severity: wishlist
Op 30-06-2007 om 08:02 schreef Christian Perrier:
If we think that it's too long without giving information to the user,
we can add some
On Monday 02 July 2007 10:46, Peter Czanik wrote:
I can't help you with coding, but I don't think, that testing the PPC
installer once or twice a week on Pegasos PPC would be a problem for
me.
That is an excellent offer. However, without somebody else from the
PowerPC community able to help
Hi guys,
I had a long conversation with Frans on IRC about this bug and the applied
patch.
I am seeing different issues such as:
1) take a fresh disk with no lvm
2) install using automatic lvm setup and it will work
3) install on it again this time not using lvm and it will work
4) install
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:59:43AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Could you enable these udebs again, preferably including the changes that
Colin says are needed?
Unfortunately this week I have a journey that will make me unavailable
so I prefer not to do this right now. I expect I will be able to
I have 3 questions about the attached patch.
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:35:22AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
if which locale /dev/null; then
default_charmap=`locale charmap`
+elif [ -d /lib/debian-installer ]; then
+default_charmap=UTF-8
else
-default_charmap=unknown # TODO:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 02 July 2007 09:34, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
A reasonable improvement over current situation could prbably be
setting TRUE a boolean d-i/keymap_changed question from within the
keymap-chooser everytime the console keymap is updated.
This
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:45:47AM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
We must decide anyway how kbd-chooser and the GTK frontend should
communicate (although it's one-way signaling, from kbd-chooser to the
GTK frontend).
Options are
1) by mean of a debconf question (debconf abuse?)
See
On Monday 02 July 2007 16:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please consider allowing 5.0.8debian2 into testing, as it fixes several
bugs, introduces wonderful new features, and has patiently sat in
unstable for 15 days without any new problems.
General reminder to RMs: there is currently no reason
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not sure if that would need to be done by an alioth admin or if we can do
it ourselves. AFAICT we should be able to do it ourselves. At least, I
had no problems creating a dump of the current repository and I'd expect
just having write access to be
On Monday 02 July 2007 15:16, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Unfortunately this week I have a journey that will make me unavailable
so I prefer not to do this right now. I expect I will be able to make
the upload around 12 July.
That's no problem.
I don't mind if the sources of console-setup are
I've been trying to work out why partman doesn't honour mount options
while mounting partitions during installation. I'm trying to write a
partman-loop udeb, and so having it honour -o loop would be rather
useful. The best explanation I've found is:
partman-basicfilesystems (4) never released;
On Monday 02 July 2007 19:43, Colin Watson wrote:
I can't think of any other flags that might be harmful during
installation. What do folks think about the attached patch?
Couldn't a bad 'noexec' break the install for chrooted commands?
Don't see any other issues.
One question though...
Where
On Monday 02 July 2007 20:13, Frans Pop wrote:
One question though...
Where do the opening brackets in the case statement suddenly come from?
s/brackets/parentheses/
I don't remember ever seeing the before; had to check the docs to see
if it had any special meaning :-)
pgpQcZiUOdYtp.pgp
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070702 17:35]:
On Monday 02 July 2007 16:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please consider allowing 5.0.8debian2 into testing, as it fixes several
bugs, introduces wonderful new features, and has patiently sat in
unstable for 15 days without any new problems.
Your message dated Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:48:57 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line cdebconf-udeb: Depends: libdebian-installer4-udeb (= 0.52)
but 0.51 is to be installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Mon, 2 Jul 2007 21:50:07 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line udpkg: Depends: libdebian-installer4-udeb (= 0.52) but 0.51
is to be installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 06:43:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
* Removed -o $options for the mount-command in mount.d/basic.
Otherwise the ro flag would mount read-only...
I can't think of any other flags that might be harmful during
installation. What do folks think about the
34 matches
Mail list logo
