Package: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6
version: 1.57
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080111 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Btw, should I report build failures of
Package: linux-modules-di-i386-2.6
version: 1.08
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080111 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied
Package: choose-mirror
version: 2.20
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080111 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Seems like your online detection is failing?
Relevant part:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:56:44AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I am currently working on adding MIPS Malta support to d-i, and I will
have a few patches to commit.
Martin suggested me to get commit access:
12:13 aurel32 ths: hi
Hi all,
I just finished writing and testing a little patch for partman-auto-lvm to let
it use all available disks in the machine for a single VG.
It can only be used by preseeding for now (partman-auto-lvm/use_all_disks) and
will erase all content in the disks other than the one used by
I plan to commit the following change to d-i. Any comment?
Index: libdebian-installer/debian/changelog
===
--- libdebian-installer/debian/changelog(révision 50853)
+++ libdebian-installer/debian/changelog(copie de
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I plan to commit the following change to d-i. Any comment?
This patch by itself looks fine.
Will any other changes needed to support MIPS Malta (partman,
base-installer), or is this all?
Cheers,
FJP
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 13:37 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:58:45PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm interested in getting d-i to work seamlessly inside a Xen guest
domain using the paravirt_ops kernel support for Xen in 2.6.24+
(currently only available in the kernel
Frans Pop a écrit :
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I plan to commit the following change to d-i. Any comment?
This patch by itself looks fine.
Thanks, I will commit it.
Will any other changes needed to support MIPS Malta (partman,
base-installer), or is this all?
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 00:59 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:58:45PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
snipp d-i side
I'd like to propose enabling Xen guest support in all the native i?86
kernel images (and eventually amd64 too), or at least in the -686-bigmem
kernel.
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
There is a small change needed to partman.
That is fine.
Then AFAIK the only changes need are in linux-modules-di-mips-2.6
So this is basically a completely new flavor, with a separate kernel?
If you do need a separate kernel, are official
choose-mirror_2.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
choose-mirror_2.21.dsc
choose-mirror_2.21.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.21_all.udeb
choose-mirror-bin_2.21_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Btw, should I report build failures of linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 and
linux-modules-di-i386-2.6, or you don't care about them? I don't mind
reporting them when they occur, but if that's just
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:17:01 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#460389: fixed in choose-mirror 2.21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
discover-data_2.2008.01.12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover-data_2.2008.01.12.dsc
discover-data_2.2008.01.12.tar.gz
discover-data_2.2008.01.12_all.deb
discover1-data_2.2008.01.12_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: choose-mirror
Seems like your online detection is failing?
It's not set anywhere, so I expect the intention is that the person who does
the mass build does an 'export ONLINE=n' if he knows that a network
connection is not available
Accepted:
choose-mirror-bin_2.21_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror-bin_2.21_i386.udeb
choose-mirror_2.21.dsc
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.21.dsc
choose-mirror_2.21.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.21.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.21_all.udeb
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:33:10AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello folks,
I'm starting to get more free time to be able to work on Debian again
and I'd like to discuss the possibility of we release a
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:47:25 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#460353: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6: FTBFS: unmet b-dep
linux-image-2.6.22-3-486
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:47:06 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#460382: linux-modules-di-i386-2.6: FTBFS: unmet b-dep
loop-aes-modules-2.6.22-3-486
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Accepted:
discover-data_2.2008.01.12.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2008.01.12.dsc
discover-data_2.2008.01.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2008.01.12.tar.gz
discover-data_2.2008.01.12_all.deb
to
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+static struct cpu system_malta_cpu[] = {
system_mips_malta_cpu would be clearer, IMO.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux
Frans Pop a écrit :
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
There is a small change needed to partman.
That is fine.
Then AFAIK the only changes need are in linux-modules-di-mips-2.6
So this is basically a completely new flavor, with a separate kernel?
True. Actually there
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Those flavours will replace the qemu flavour that will be removed in
kernel 2.6.24, now that QEMU emulates real hardware correctly.
OK. In that case does it make sense to clean up the existing QEMU support
after Malta support has been
We have discussed migrating discover1 over to discover for a year or
so, and I still believe this is a good idea. There is as far as I can
see no useful functionality in discover1 that is not covered in
discover. Discover v2 on the other hand have the new features to map
hardware to debian
(Idea based on discussion for #452273)
On Friday 11 January 2008, you wrote:
Guillem Jover wrote:
There's 278 udebs in the current main Packages file. Each Package-Type
field takes 19 bytes, so 5282 bytes of bloat. In comparison the
Description field takes 49416 bytes. If you are really
Otavio Salvador a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+static struct cpu system_malta_cpu[] = {
system_mips_malta_cpu would be clearer, IMO.
Well other names from the same file (which BTW has mips in its name)
don't contain mips, that's why I did the same.
Frans Pop a écrit :
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Those flavours will replace the qemu flavour that will be removed in
kernel 2.6.24, now that QEMU emulates real hardware correctly.
OK. In that case does it make sense to clean up the existing QEMU support
after Malta
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 01:40:20PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Package: mklibs
Version: 0.1.26
Severity: important
It seems that mklibs is not working properly on mipsel. When I boot a
daily d-i image made with mklibs it stops after:
| Freeing unused kernel memory: 124k freed
When I
On 12/01/08 at 20:36 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: choose-mirror
Seems like your online detection is failing?
It's not set anywhere, so I expect the intention is that the person who does
the mass build does an 'export ONLINE=n' if
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Discover v2 on the other hand have the new features to map
hardware to debian packages for installation, and this feature should
be part of the default Debian installation, I believe. To test it
yourself, install discover and run
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Looking at the size, the mips initrd.gz is 400kB smaller and I see no
reason for that. Either mklibs is still broken on mips, or images are
generated with the old buggy mklibs.
The answer is in the last message to the BR before yours:
Hi,
Please find below a small patch that adds support for the MIPS Malta
platform in partman-partitioning and base-installer.
Any comments?
Aurelien
Index: packages/partman/partman-partitioning/debian/changelog
===
---
On Saturday 12 January 2008, you wrote:
Except that it now works on mipsel (at least here), while the BR clearly
say it doesn't work on mipsel. The problem on mips may be different, as
the symptoms are different than the ones that have been reported.
Given to the reason above, I am personally
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:22:02 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#445507: not working on mipsel - initrd not starting
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Please find below a small patch that adds support for the MIPS Malta
platform in partman-partitioning and base-installer.
In all cases I'd probably sort the new values together with the r[45]k
values instead of behind sb1*/qemu.
Other than that
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 12/01/08 at 20:36 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 12 January 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Seems like your online detection is failing?
It's not set anywhere, so I expect the intention is that the person who
does the mass build
FYI: The status of the cdebconf source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.114
Current version: 0.126
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
FYI: The status of the libdebian-installer source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.52
Current version: 0.54
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Please find below a small patch that adds support for the MIPS Malta
platform in partman-partitioning and base-installer.
Forgot one thing. Please add a test case for the subarch for base-installer
(under kernel/tests/) and make sure that it
(CCing Stephen as I'm not sure if he's subscribed)
Stephen,
Recently you committed this change in r50759:
+partman-base (116) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ [ Stephen R. Marenka ]
+ * m68k: don't make partman uninstallable for atari
However, There is still this code in
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r2/i386/iso-cd/debian-40r2-i386-CD-1.iso
Date: 13 Jan 08
Machine: HP Omnibook 3000 Laptop
Processor: 200 MHz Intel
Memory: 80 Mbyte
Partitions: 8 Gbyte ext2 boot partition; 200 Mbyte Linux
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:42:59AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
(CCing Stephen as I'm not sure if he's subscribed)
I'm subscribed.
Recently you committed this change in r50759:
+partman-base (116) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ [ Stephen R. Marenka ]
+ * m68k: don't make partman uninstallable
[Frans Pop]
Just done that and noticed three issues:
- the dialog allowing selection of packages does not have a title
- the dialog should have a cancel button (enable backup capability)
Good ideas. I'll try to implement them.
- I was (only) offered 915resolution, but AFAIK that package is
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Frans Pop]
- I was (only) offered 915resolution, but AFAIK that package is no
longer needed with current Intel XOrg drivers
Aha. Feedback (as it BTS reports against the discover-data package)
is needed with information on what
Below are a lot of comments intended to help make this schedule work, not as
criticisms.
On Friday 11 January 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Bellow goes the proposed timeline.
It is a bit hard to really comment on this timeline as it does not really
contain any info on the work do be done to
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
| 2/12/2007 mass migration of udebs
You should also inform the RMs at some point that all unblocks for udebs
will need explicit D-I RM approval again.
You may also need to coordinate or at least keep an eye on some packages
that are not strictly
47 matches
Mail list logo
