Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: netinst image
Image version: modified di-nslu2.bin (from joeyh's 2008-03-07)
Date: 2008-03-07, 06:00 UTC
Machine: Linksys NSLU2
Partitions:
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
none /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Friday 07 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
I cleaned that up - most of was came in due copy paste from other places
in the file. Thanks again for the comments, a new version is attached.
Looks fine to me.
I'm not sure that I agree with Christian
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:07:23PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
I found a few issues, some of which I could solve by modifying the
configuration. The experimental package seems to have been using a default
configuration for the udeb as debian/config/config.udeb (and config.deb) is
empty...
Hu?
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
I don't exactly agree about meaningless. Knowing that WWID means
WorldWide IDentifier helped me to understand that this seems to be a
generic way to name a multipath device, so expanding the acronym has
at least some teaching benefit.
I
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hu? Neither config.deb nor config.udeb are empty in the repo nor the
source package.
Hmm. Weird.
If I use cat on the files, I get the content. But if I use less, I only get:
$ less config.deb
busybox-1.9.1/debian/config/config.deb:
*** Contents:
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 13:51 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Hmm. Weird.
If I use cat on the files, I get the content. But if I use less, I
only get:
$ less config.deb
busybox-1.9.1/debian/config/config.deb:
*** Contents:
So that's why I thought they were empty. As I said, weird :-)
I
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 01:51:49PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
Hu? Neither config.deb nor config.udeb are empty in the repo nor the
source package.
If I use cat on the files, I get the content. But if I use less, I only get:
$ less config.deb
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:34:45PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Of course, GRUB stuff comes pretty late, but it wouldn't really hurst
to put WorldWide IDentifier somewhere:
I think it's fine to put this in the manual but people not knowing what
a WWID is will have a hard time to even set up
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 11:55:54AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
I don't exactly agree about meaningless. Knowing that WWID means
WorldWide IDentifier helped me to understand that this seems to be a
generic way to name a multipath device, so expanding the acronym has
at least some teaching
Hi,
Could the openssl version from unstable be hinted testing? I think
the ABI changes have lived long enough in unstable.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-07 12:06]:
Hmm, not only Thiemo's daily builds are broken, the ones built on
the buildd for beta1 also have the same problem.
I believe Thiemo built those by hand since the buildds had a broken
kernel.
Yes.
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 08:10:46AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Looks fine to me.
Thanks for reviewing. Maybe we can move all things into place after
beta1? I'll look into updating partman-multipath with your suggestions
and hopefully grub2 support until then.
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
Maybe we can move all things into place after beta1?
Yes, that would be fine IMO, but needs OK from Otavio as another release is
planned soon after beta1.
I'll look into updating partman-multipath with your suggestions
Was wondering when that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jeroen,
I hope this is the last sync before the Beta1 release. Please sync
following packages:
hdparm
pkgsel
partman-partitioning
Please also remove rootskel-gtk binary from s390 architecture.
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
Kurt,
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 04:02:05PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Could the openssl version from unstable be hinted testing? I think
the ABI changes have lived long enough in unstable.
I got NACKs from the d-i release managers until the release. Apart from
that it looks good and could be
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 05:04:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
It would be great if you could do grub2 support as that would also cover
dmraid support with grub2. I originally implemented it, but cannot test it
ATM (have a system that supports it, but no spare SATA disks to play with).
Can you
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: downloaded DVD-1 from torrent, booted and installed
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/bt-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso.torrent
Date: March 8th 2008
Machine: custom Gigabyte GA-945GCMX-S2
Processor: Intel 2140
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 05:04:28PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
It would be great if you could do grub2 support as that would also
cover dmraid support with grub2. I originally implemented it, but
cannot test it ATM (have a system that supports it,
Philipp Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kurt,
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 04:02:05PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Could the openssl version from unstable be hinted testing? I think
the ABI changes have lived long enough in unstable.
I got NACKs from the d-i release managers until the release.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
Maybe we can move all things into place after beta1?
Yes, that would be fine IMO, but needs OK from Otavio as another release is
planned soon after beta1.
Your message dated Sat, 8 Mar 2008 21:36:19 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Commited
has caused the Debian Bug report #469650,
regarding console-setup: [INTL:eu] debconf templates Basque translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
found 469650 1.21
tags 469650 pending
thanks
I commited my translation (translation).
thanks christian once again for all your work.
That's fine, but technically speaking, you shouldn't have closed your
bug report. It will indeed be closed by the next upload because of the
Closes: #469650
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 469650 1.21
Bug#469650: console-setup: [INTL:eu] debconf templates Basque translation
Bug marked as found in version 1.21 and reopened.
tags 469650 pending
Bug#469650: console-setup: [INTL:eu] debconf templates Basque translation
Tags were:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB
Image version:
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-i386/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz
Date: 08/03/2008, 22h25
Machine: Compaq presario C300
Processor: intel
Initial boot: [O ]
Detect network card:[E ]
On Mar 8, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
Except that after the reboot synaptic (and aptitude, as well...
I checked) immediately wanted to upgrade the kernel from
what came with the install.
That's called a security update...
Cheers,
FJP
On Saturday 08 March 2008, you wrote:
Which would be fine, except that this was a businesscard
installation. Everything is gotten from the network. Shouldn't it
always get the latest version of the kernel, given that it's going to
the network anyway, wherever it might be retrieved from?
No.
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 01:20:43PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jeroen,
I hope this is the last sync before the Beta1 release. Please sync
following packages:
hdparm
pkgsel
partman-partitioning
Done...
Please also remove
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 468738 + pending
Bug#468738: partman-crypto: unsafe_swap: code completely broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tags 468739 + pending
Bug#468739: partman-crypto: crypto_check_mountpoints: incorrect mount point test
There were no tags
28 matches
Mail list logo
