Your message dated Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:51:33 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#274994: Installation via PPPoE uneasy
has caused the Debian Bug report #274994,
regarding Installation via PPPoE uneasy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi there,
I have nearly got my Debianslug to do exactly what I want it to do.
There's only one small thing which I can't get working so far. I am not
able to connect my Epson Stylus C66 printer to it via USB.
I have followed the usual instructions of installing such a printer by
firstly
Hi!
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb:
[..]
Frans, could you please pay special attention to the paragraph about d-i?
Frans, everything okay? I didn't got anything from you, yet. Attached
is the current state with an changed part about the debian-installer.
Please comment *now* we can't
A drag queen that looks much better than Miss America
http://www.fytema.es/hotnews.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonas Meurer wrote:
hello debian-release,
Hi
I'd like to request a freeze exception for cryptsetup 1.0.6-4. I didn't
upload it to unstable yet, but if no objections are raised, I'll do so
tomorrow.
Cc-ing debian-boot as it contains a udeb... no objections from the RT.
Cheers
Luk
at
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 04:24:20PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
Attached you'll find the current draft for the announcement of
etch-and-a-half. Please review it; current schedule for it to be send
out is tomorrow.
correction dcc Security
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:08:56AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Ok, so here are two patches. One of them using recipes-x86, and the other
simply modifiing recipes.
The first one expects recipes-x86 has been created
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:34:26 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#297175: Debian install - please mention need to run
dexconf after X configuration
has caused the Debian Bug report #297175,
regarding Debian install - please mention need to run dexconf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
reassign 337219 hw-detect
Bug#337219: firmwares and d-i
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `hw-detect'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Britney Spears' baby sister to wed Justin Timberlake
http://www.fytema.es/hotnews.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:42:30 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#337219: firmwares and d-i
has caused the Debian Bug report #337219,
regarding firmwares and d-i
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
reassign 337219 hw-detect
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trans fat found to be good for health http://www.gabrielstadlin.ch/hotnews.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi the debian installer is unable to detect my network when its installing, can
you help? thanks.
_
Play and win great prizes with Live Search and Kung Fu Panda
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/101719966/direct/01/
Package: pkgsel
Version: 0.21
Severity: important
Hi,
Although I don't make sure the responsibility of this bug is pkgsel or
etch-and-a-half, pkgsel failed when I chose suite=etch.
pkgsel 0.21 calls aptitude safe-upgrade as default pkgsel/upgrade
debconf parameter. Unfortunately Etch's aptitude
tag 492593 pending
thanks
On Sunday 27 July 2008, Kenshi Muto wrote:
So it means current snapshot Lenny installer can't install
etch-and-a-half without a tweak.
To install etch-n-half users are supposed to use Beta2 versions of D-I
where this is not an issue. The etchnhalf installation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 492593 pending
Bug#492593: installation-report: pkgsel fails if etch-and-a-half is chosen
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Are there any plans for rc1? I think we should do a rc1 asap based on
2.6.25 and then move to 2.6.26 when it's ready.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New stricter unemployment benefits in California spark complaints
http://www.gabrielstadlin.ch/hotnews.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 01:59:40PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
on a system where core.img was embedded, nothing will happen. OTOH if you do
the same on a system where core.img was referenced via blocklists, boot will
start crashing as soon as the (now free) blocks that held the old core.img
I'm sorry that this is late, but the announcement has a rather
disturbing number of problems. I'd suggest at least the following changes:
New CD and DVD images containing updated packages and the regular
installation
media accompanied with the package archive respectively will be available
* Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-19 17:22]:
Please have a look at the following packages with solved RC bugs to see
if it's ok to unblock them:
* busybox
* gnumach
* live-installer
* mdadm
* qcontrol
* rootskel-gtk
* udev
otavio, any comments on these?
--
Martin Michlmayr
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
In previous releases d-i used devfs style device node names, is it true
that you have moved away from that? That would simplify the uswsusp
maitainer script...
Yes, it's been a long time since d-i used devfs style names.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
I have a new email address!You can now email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TO SAFEGUARD $25.5M,TO UR AC WE WILL SHARE 50-50,NO RISK INVOLVE, GET BACK TO
ME FOR MORE DETAILS
- Maxwell Williams
Op Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:42:26 -0400
schreef Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
In previous releases d-i used devfs style device node names, is it
true that you have moved away from that? That would simplify the
uswsusp maitainer script...
Yes, it's been a long time since
American athletes denied Chinese visa and are unable to compete in upcoming
Olympics
http://kanshodo.ipower.com/fresh.html
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
apt-setup_0.38_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.38.dsc
apt-setup_0.38.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.38_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.38_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.38_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-27 11:36]:
Please have a look at the following packages with solved RC bugs to see
if it's ok to unblock them:
* busybox
* gnumach
* live-installer
* mdadm
* qcontrol
* rootskel-gtk
* udev
otavio, any comments on these?
It
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.38_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.38_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.38_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.38_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.38_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.38_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.38.dsc
to
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:27:42AM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Are there any plans for rc1? I think we should do a rc1 asap based on
2.6.25 and then move to 2.6.26 when it's ready.
I think we also need to review the various changes that have been
proposed to the list in the past (some have
Hi!
Please keep the bug report CC'ed.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:55:32PM +0100, Jon Thackray wrote:
And yet further efforts. I rebooted using an Ubuntu CD, and checked what
modules were installed. It would appear that what is needed at least for
the PATA system on the 955 board (D955XBKLKR)
* Timo Jyrinki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-21 21:53]:
Only possible problem during installation I hit was that I wasn't
able to choose Finnish as installation language. Maybe a feature of
this installation method, not a bug? At one point there was
possibility to choose language, I think - it
* Timo Jyrinki [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-21 21:53]:
After installation I did encounter problems with using external disks:
- System hang whenever either eSATA disk or USB disk was connected or
disconnected
I'm away from my QNAP right now but I'll test this next week.
However, I believe this
* Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-28 01:05]:
I think we also need to review the various changes that have been
proposed to the list in the past (some have been pending for months) and
decide wherever we are going to include them for Lenny or not.
Maybe we can schedule an IRC meeting
On Sunday 27 July 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-19 17:22]:
Please have a look at the following packages with solved RC bugs to
see if it's ok to unblock them:
* busybox
* gnumach
* live-installer
* mdadm
* qcontrol
* rootskel-gtk
* udev
Hi folks,
Testing by initially manty and later confirmed by me showed that the
option to use the etchnhalf netinst in combination with CD1 does not
work. Reason turns out to be that the CD remains mounted in /target
because the Etch version of apt-cdrom does not always unmount it; this
blocks
FWIW, Netwinder support will be removed after etch, so I don't intend
to work on this bug.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 27 July 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm sorry that this is late, but the announcement has a rather
disturbing number of problems.
There's also an issue with the D-I section. The fact that ssh was used
with network-console was the reason why d-i needed a rebuild, but the
announcement
On 27/07/2008 Luk Claes wrote:
I'd like to request a freeze exception for cryptsetup 1.0.6-4. I didn't
upload it to unstable yet, but if no objections are raised, I'll do so
tomorrow.
Cc-ing debian-boot as it contains a udeb... no objections from the RT.
Ok, I just uploaded cryptsetup
Hi Jeremy
[ for some reason I did not get an email with your question, only the
bug did... Should I have gotten one if you sent mail just to the bug?
This may have been a transitory problem in our email system.
]
Is this also the last message you see when using Expert Installation?
Yes,
Please unblock cdebootstrap/0.5.3, devmapper/2:1.02.27-3, lvm2/2.02.39-2
and s390-tools/1.6.2-1.
Bastian
--
We have phasers, I vote we blast 'em!
-- Bailey, The Corbomite Maneuver, stardate 1514.2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.26_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-modules-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx-di_1.26_arm.udeb
jffs2-modules-2.6.25-2-orion5x-di_1.26_arm.udeb
pata-modules-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx-di_1.26_arm.udeb
crc-modules-2.6.25-2-orion5x-di_1.26_arm.udeb
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.42_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.42.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.42.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.25-2-amd64-di_1.42_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.25-2-amd64-di_1.42_amd64.udeb
linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6_1.32_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
reiserfs-modules-2.6.25-2-sparc64-di_1.32_sparc.udeb
usb-modules-2.6.25-2-sparc64-di_1.32_sparc.udeb
jfs-modules-2.6.25-2-sparc64-di_1.32_sparc.udeb
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.28_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ipv6-modules-2.6.25-2-r4k-ip22-di_0.28_mips.udeb
rtc-modules-2.6.25-2-r5k-ip32-di_0.28_mips.udeb
crypto-dm-modules-2.6.25-2-r4k-ip22-di_0.28_mips.udeb
linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_1.27_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
crypto-core-modules-2.6.25-2-parisc64-di_1.27_hppa.udeb
ipv6-modules-2.6.25-2-parisc-di_1.27_hppa.udeb
crypto-dm-modules-2.6.25-2-parisc-di_1.27_hppa.udeb
linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6_1.18_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx-di_1.18_armel.udeb
crypto-core-modules-2.6.25-2-iop32x-di_1.18_armel.udeb
jffs2-modules-2.6.25-2-orion5x-di_1.18_armel.udeb
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.26_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6_0.26.dsc
dasd-modules-2.6.25-2-s390-di_0.26_s390.udeb
md-modules-2.6.25-2-s390-di_0.26_s390.udeb
scsi-core-modules-2.6.25-2-s390-di_0.26_s390.udeb
linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6_1.31_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ntfs-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.31_ia64.udeb
nic-usb-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.31_ia64.udeb
xfs-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.31_ia64.udeb
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.28_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ide-modules-2.6.25-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.28_mipsel.udeb
md-modules-2.6.25-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.28_mipsel.udeb
md-modules-2.6.25-2-4kc-malta-di_0.28_mipsel.udeb
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-parisc-di_1.27_hppa.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-parisc-di_1.27_hppa.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-parisc64-di_1.27_hppa.udeb
to
Accepted:
core-modules-2.6.25-2-s390-di_0.26_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/core-modules-2.6.25-2-s390-di_0.26_s390.udeb
crypto-core-modules-2.6.25-2-s390-di_0.26_s390.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6/crypto-core-modules-2.6.25-2-s390-di_0.26_s390.udeb
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-4kc-malta-di_0.28_mipsel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-4kc-malta-di_0.28_mipsel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.28_mipsel.udeb
to
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx-di_1.18_armel.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx-di_1.18_armel.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-iop32x-di_1.18_armel.udeb
to
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.31_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.31_ia64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.31_ia64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-itanium-di_1.31_ia64.udeb
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.25-2-amd64-di_1.42_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.25-2-amd64-di_1.42_amd64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.25-2-amd64-di_1.42_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.25-2-amd64-di_1.42_amd64.udeb
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx-di_1.26_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.25-2-ixp4xx-di_1.26_arm.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-footbridge-di_1.26_arm.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-footbridge-di_1.26_arm.udeb
Accepted:
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-4kc-malta-di_0.28_mips.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-4kc-malta-di_0.28_mips.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.28_mips.udeb
to
Accepted:
ata-modules-2.6.25-2-sparc64-di_1.32_sparc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.25-2-sparc64-di_1.32_sparc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.25-2-sparc64-di_1.32_sparc.udeb
to
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:17:13 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#490562: fixed in linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6 1.27
has caused the Debian Bug report #490562,
regarding installation-report: hd-image couldn't mount partition
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:17:27 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#490562: fixed in linux-kernel-di-s390-2.6 0.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #490562,
regarding installation-report: hd-image couldn't mount partition
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:17:16 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#490562: fixed in linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6 1.31
has caused the Debian Bug report #490562,
regarding installation-report: hd-image couldn't mount partition
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:17:29 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#490562: fixed in linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 1.32
has caused the Debian Bug report #490562,
regarding installation-report: hd-image couldn't mount partition
to be marked as done.
This means
63 matches
Mail list logo
