Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 493720 kbd-chooser
Bug#493720: Installation Report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kbd-chooser'.
retitle 493720 kbd-chooser: unable to preseed with non-canonical keymap name
Bug#493720: Installation Report
Changed Bug
reassign 493720 kbd-chooser
retitle 493720 kbd-chooser: unable to preseed with non-canonical keymap name
tags 493720 + confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Bernhard wrote:
The problem is the german keyboard layout.
To select the german keyboard layout, the following
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: floppy
Image version:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-i386/current//images/floppy/boot.img
Date: downloaded: 30 July 2008, around 5:00 PM / date on file: 19 July
2008, 8:49 PM
Machine: Toshiba Portege M200, currently
Hi,
I want to create a Debian based bootable system (CD-ROM or USB stick), but I
want to give a simple middle to configure the network.
The network configuration utility in Debian installer seems to be perfect, but
can I use it independently ? Is there a package/script/binary to use it on a
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20080522
Severity: minor
After update of debian-installer from beta2 to the daily build version
from 2008-08-03, d-i asks for firmware for my WLAN IPW2200BG.
Because i have an automatic installation with preseed file, i would
suppress this question.
The answer
Lupita Jones: No mandaré a
mis Niñas a la guerra sin fusil
Lo nuevo de Luis Miguel
Te desean
Mariana González
Nuestra Belleza N.L. 2008
Ropa y moda para Tu tipo
de cuerpo
Exfoliador natural para
Tus Pies
[http://www.regiabella.com]
This message
This is fixed in the current busybox(-1.10.x) package.
thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:15:28 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#322466: busybox-udeb: Newline missing after lsmod
header line
has caused the Debian Bug report #322466,
regarding busybox-udeb: Newline missing after lsmod header line
to be marked as
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've prepared the patches needed to get i386 and amd64 ready for
2.6.26. The diff is attached for review.
I'd like to someone from d-i to ack/nack this patches. Otherwise I'll
commit them and ask porters to base their work on that tomorrow.
Cheers,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 07:14:30AM +, Christian Perrier wrote:
Author: bubulle
Date: Tue Aug 5 07:14:29 2008
New Revision: 54817
Log:
French translation update
[…]
@@ -1332,10 +1325,9 @@
#. :sl3:
#. flag:translate:6
#: ../mdcfg-utils.templates:6001
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid RAID0
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:52:43PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I am working on solving a quite old issue (#339855) in the graphical
version of the debian-installer: it does not currently provide an easy
way to get a shell.
A solution for this issue has been proposed to the debian-installer
tags 493720 + patch
thanks
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 01:11:44AM +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
As far as I have been able to track down this issue, it is related to
the change which happened in cdebconf 0.132. The default value for
select questions that are noninteractive must since be in the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 493720 + patch
Bug#493720: kbd-chooser: unable to preseed with non-canonical keymap name
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:44:20PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to finally fix the perl-base utf8 warning bug (#480533)
by moving /usr/share/perl/5.10/unicore/lib from perl into perl-base.
Apologies for the delay, I won't bore you with my
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD , CD-netinst, CD-weekly-image
Image version: Full URL to image you downloaded is best
Date: 5/Aug/2008
Machine: Xserve G5 Dual 2Ghz PowerPC
Processor: G5
Memory: 4Gb
Partitions:
Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):
Base System Installation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
severity 484700 serious
Bug#484700: buildd.emdebian.org: busybox chpasswd broken in crossbuilt package
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
reassign 484700 busybox
Bug#484700:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
#
# hw-detect (1.66) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * On frontends other than GTK+, only ask about PCMCIA resource range when
#user decided to start PCMCIA. (Closes: #479391)
#
package archdetect hw-detect ethdetect
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.29~bpo40+1
#
# hw-detect (1.66) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * On frontends other than GTK+, only ask about PCMCIA resource range when
#user decided to start PCMCIA. (Closes:
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Log:
Ask about PCMCIA resource conditionally on text/newt frontend
On frontends other than GTK+, the question about PCMCIA resource range
is now only asked if the user decided to start PCMCIA.
I know that this break the rule of acting
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Preseeding with de-latin1-nodeadkeys should work until we fix this
regression.
I'm not sure that this _is_ a regression.
As far as I have been able to track down this issue, it is related to
the change which happened in cdebconf 0.132. The
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
#. flag:translate:6
#: ../mdcfg-utils.templates:6001
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid RAID0
msgid RAID10
-msgstr RAID0
+msgstr RAID10
I think something went wrong here. It's not RAID10 that should be
translated but Cancel. Christian, could
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
The correct way to differentiate between the frontends would be to
_add_ a separate db_go for the first question and make the second
question dependant on the answer to the first one.
Completely suppressing the second question is IMO not acceptable.
On Thursday 31 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I don't really like the idea of hook scripts determining how the main
script works.
Could you clarify why?
Because not only is there absolutely no need for them to do so, it is also
seriously fragile to expect random hook scripts to output
tag 472846 fixed-upstream
thanks
Works fine for me with busybox = 1.10.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/busybox_1_10_stable$ echo -e '#!/bin/sh\nsleep 600'
foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/busybox_1_10_stable$ chmod +x foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/busybox_1_10_stable$ PATH=::$PATH foo
[1] 26088
[EMAIL
partman-auto-crypto_9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-crypto_9.dsc
partman-auto-crypto_9.tar.gz
partman-auto-crypto_9_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
partman-auto_80_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_80.dsc
partman-auto_80.tar.gz
partman-auto_80_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
partman-auto-lvm_28_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-lvm_28.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_28.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_28_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
partman-auto-raid_12_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-raid_12.dsc
partman-auto-raid_12.tar.gz
partman-auto-raid_12_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
partman-basicfilesystems_61_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_61.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_61.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_61_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Friday 01 August 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
As far as my imagination goes, the problem in this approach lies in the
debconf-apt-progress interface. It takes:
--from start position --to end position
debconf-apt-progress is used (at least) by the popcon pre-pkgsel.d
script. So we would
partman-basicmethods_41_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicmethods_41.dsc
partman-basicmethods_41.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_41_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
partman-crypto_34_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-crypto_34.dsc
partman-crypto_34.tar.gz
partman-crypto-dm_34_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_34_all.udeb
partman-crypto_34_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
partman-jfs_28_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-jfs_28.dsc
partman-jfs_28.tar.gz
partman-jfs_28_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
partman-ext3_53_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext3_53.dsc
partman-ext3_53.tar.gz
partman-ext3_53_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
partman-lvm_62_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_62.dsc
partman-lvm_62.tar.gz
partman-lvm_62_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
partman-basicmethods_41.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_41.dsc
partman-basicmethods_41.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_41.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_41_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-auto-crypto_9.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-crypto/partman-auto-crypto_9.dsc
partman-auto-crypto_9.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-crypto/partman-auto-crypto_9.tar.gz
partman-auto-crypto_9_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-crypto/partman-auto-crypto_9_all.udeb
Accepted:
partman-auto-lvm_28.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_28.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_28.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_28.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_28_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_28_all.udeb
Override entries for
Accepted:
partman-auto-raid_12.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_12.dsc
partman-auto-raid_12.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_12.tar.gz
partman-auto-raid_12_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_12_all.udeb
Override
Accepted:
partman-jfs_28.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_28.dsc
partman-jfs_28.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_28.tar.gz
partman-jfs_28_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-jfs/partman-jfs_28_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-jfs_28.dsc - source
Accepted:
partman-ext3_53.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_53.dsc
partman-ext3_53.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_53.tar.gz
partman-ext3_53_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_53_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-ext3_53.dsc -
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_61.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_61.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_61.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_61.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_61_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-lvm_62.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_62.dsc
partman-lvm_62.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_62.tar.gz
partman-lvm_62_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_62_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-lvm_62.dsc - source
Accepted:
partman-auto_80.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_80.dsc
partman-auto_80.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_80.tar.gz
partman-auto_80_amd64.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_80_amd64.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-auto_80.dsc
Accepted:
partman-crypto-dm_34_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_34_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_34_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_34_all.udeb
partman-crypto_34.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_34.dsc
partman-md_42_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-md_42.dsc
partman-md_42.tar.gz
partman-md_42_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
partman-partitioning_61_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_61.dsc
partman-partitioning_61.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_61_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 04:55:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I'm not sure that this _is_ a regression.
As far as I have been able to track down this issue, it is related to
the change which happened in cdebconf 0.132. The default value for
select questions that are noninteractive must
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 493865 busybox-udeb
Bug#493865: Bug booting from console
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `busybox-udeb'.
retitle 493865 cttyhack does not handle other serial devices than ttySn
Bug#493865: Bug booting from console
reassign 493865 busybox-udeb
retitle 493865 cttyhack does not handle other serial devices than ttySn
tags 493865 + d-i patch
severity 493865 important
thanks
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 03:29:29PM +0200, Giuseppe Falsetti wrote:
I'm trying to install lenny/beta2 on an headless xserveG5.
The install
partman-target_56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_56.dsc
partman-target_56.tar.gz
partman-target_56_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
partman-xfs_42_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-xfs_42.dsc
partman-xfs_42.tar.gz
partman-xfs_42_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
partman-reiserfs_43_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-reiserfs_43.dsc
partman-reiserfs_43.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_43_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:02:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#411943: fixed in partman-lvm 62
has caused the Debian Bug report #411943,
regarding Uses different value to GB then rest of partman
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:02:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#411943: fixed in partman-lvm 62
has caused the Debian Bug report #411943,
regarding partman-lvm: cannot set a size to lvm partition (size 0 is invalid)
to be marked as done.
This means that
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# nothing here fits the policy for serious
severity 484700 important
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:02:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#492899: fixed in partman-crypto 34
has caused the Debian Bug report #492899,
regarding partman-crypto: cancel button unusable on Erasing data screen
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:02:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#411943: fixed in partman-lvm 62
has caused the Debian Bug report #411943,
regarding partman-lvm: size of new LVs must be given in multiple of 1024
instead of 1000
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
# nothing here fits the policy for serious
severity 484700 important
Bug#484700: busybox: chpasswd fails to set root password
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
End of
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:47:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#487694: fixed in partman-auto 80
has caused the Debian Bug report #487694,
regarding Incorrect dialog shown on go back
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:16:08 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists
'debian-installer' processes
has caused the Debian Bug report #472846,
regarding busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists
Accepted:
partman-target_56.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_56.dsc
partman-target_56.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_56.tar.gz
partman-target_56_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_56_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_61.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_61.dsc
partman-partitioning_61.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_61.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_61_amd64.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-reiserfs_43.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_43.dsc
partman-reiserfs_43.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_43.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_43_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_43_all.udeb
Override entries for
Accepted:
partman-xfs_42.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_42.dsc
partman-xfs_42.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_42.tar.gz
partman-xfs_42_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_42_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-xfs_42.dsc - source
Accepted:
partman-md_42.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_42.dsc
partman-md_42.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_42.tar.gz
partman-md_42_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-md/partman-md_42_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-md_42.dsc - source
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#398668: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #398668,
regarding partman-md: should not recreated device dirs at each partman restart
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393728: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #393728,
regarding root on ext3 over lvm over dm-crypt over raid 1 fails to boot
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393728: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #393728,
regarding debian-installer: Encryption on top of software RAID broken in daily
build
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393728: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #393728,
regarding Bug in Etch debian-installer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391479: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #391479,
regarding partman-md: Devices always show up as use for lvm.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393728: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #393728,
regarding Buggy debian-installer of etch when using MD with encryption and LVM
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391474: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #391474,
regarding partitioner: Show md devices from first start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393728: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #393728,
regarding installation-report: boot fails with encrypted root over raid
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391483: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #391483,
regarding partman-md: Deleting md devices doesn't work.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393728: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #393728,
regarding dm-crypt on raid does not play nicely
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#391474: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #391474,
regarding partman: Detecting raid devices when starting the partitioner.
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#393728: fixed in partman-md 42
has caused the Debian Bug report #393728,
regarding debian-installer: amd64 re-boot fails due to missing /etc/crypttab
to be marked as done.
This means that
found 472846 1:1.10.2-1
thanks
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
- if you can actually test against the version in Debian unstable, you
could even close the bug directly rather than tagging it. I've tested
it against current Debian busybox and 1:1.10.2-1 indeed seems
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 472846 1:1.10.2-1
Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists 'debian-installer'
processes
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.10.2-1 and reopened.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Your message dated Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:43:22 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists
'debian-installer' processes
has caused the Debian Bug report #472846,
regarding busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
reassign 493865 busybox-udeb
retitle 493865 cttyhack does not handle other serial devices than ttySn
tags 493865 + d-i patch
severity 493865 important
thanks
Any reason for not merging this with #484366?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tuesday 5 August 2008 19:40, you wrote:
Please test whether bugs have been fixed in the environment where they
have been reported, in this case Debian Installer. Or at least be very
sure you have exactly reproduced the use case.
With BusyBox 1.10.2 'pidof debian-installer' still outputs
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
console-keymaps-at (at least) ships more keymaps than those that can
actually be selected from the select list. IMHO, it makes sense to
allow users to select those by preseeding.
Why?
IMO it only makes sense if we were at least to check that a
Hi,
Here are the patches concerning the functional changes. I also modified the
error strings to follow Christian Perrier's advices. Please note that this
patch adds a new string, Multiple disks, that should be translated.
Cheers,
Grégory
diff -ruN --exclude=.svn --exclude=debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Reopen again
found 472846 1:1.10.2-1
Bug#472846: busybox: Regression in pidof: no longer lists 'debian-installer'
processes
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.10.2-1 and reopened.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 07:40:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
- if you can actually test against the version in Debian unstable, you
could even close the bug directly rather than tagging it. I've tested
it against current Debian busybox
On Monday 28 July 2008, Mathias Huber wrote:
this is just to let you know that we have an article on d-i online at
http://www.linux-magazin.de/online_artikel/debian_installer_fuer_lenny_
beta_2
The article is by Heike Jurzik. The piece is in German and is based on
d-i Lenny beta 2.
Thanks
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 31 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I don't really like the idea of hook scripts determining how the main
script works.
Could you clarify why?
Because not only is there absolutely no need for them to do so, it is also
seriously fragile
partman-ext2r0_1.16_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext2r0_1.16.dsc
partman-ext2r0_1.16.tar.gz
partman-ext2r0_1.16_arm.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
partman-ext2r0_1.16.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_1.16.dsc
partman-ext2r0_1.16.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_1.16.tar.gz
partman-ext2r0_1.16_arm.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext2r0/partman-ext2r0_1.16_arm.udeb
Override entries for your
On Monday 28 July 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
The following sequence (at medium priority) will result in an
apparent loop:
1 Allow root - yes
2 Root password - empty
3 Confirm passwd - empty
4 Error dialog - continue
5 Back to 1: Allow root - go back
This should result in the menu
* Jérémy Bobbio [Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:51:07 +0200]:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:52:43PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I am working on solving a quite old issue (#339855) in the graphical
version of the debian-installer: it does not currently provide an easy
way to get a shell.
A solution
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could you please review the changes in vte and acknowledge an upload to
unstable?
Ok. Aside from autostuff, patch is not that big, so let's get this into
unstable, and see if somebody spots any regressions.
Great.
Is the development of this feature
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:45:19PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
In all other cases where we use hook scripts we advance the progress
bar by some fixed amount per hook script. The only additional feature
here is that some hook scripts can usefully subdivide their allotted
bit.
I have only took a
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:33:12PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Because not only is there absolutely no need for them to do so, it is also
seriously fragile to expect random hook scripts to output nothing else
than their progress bar end position.
The patch handles any script output and log it.
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
Can you please check if this is fixed for d-i with the current stable
branch:
$ svn co svn://svn.busybox.net/branches/busybox_1_11_stable
I'm afraid it is not fixed in the SVN version either.
The reason may be that the debian-installer script
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:42:13PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
debconf receives:
INPUT critical user-setup/password-empty
INPUT low passwd/shadow
INPUT medium passwd/root-login
GO
So actually, the behaviour of the Go back button is right for the
newt frontend according to the
* Otavio Salvador [Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:47:57 -0300]:
busybox, gnumach, live-installer, mdadm, qcontrol can be unblocked.
rootskel-gtk and udev should stay blocked.
About udev .. I was mostly out last week and I'll gather some
information about its status and if it's OK I send a mail to
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
