* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-01-16 07:28]:
/target/etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
This is really a rather ugly solution because there really is no need to
generate the initrd twice. It is also RC buggy as it means you mess
around with another package's conf file, which is a
When I get the error...
parted_server: OUT: Error
parted_server: OUT: Error informing the kernel about modifications to
partition /dev/hda5 -- Device or resource busy. This means Linux
won't know about any changes you made to /dev/hda5 until you reboot --
so you shouldn't mount it or use it in
Hello,
this is a very late follow-up, but apparently just in time, to [1]. I'm
very sorry about the delay (though I never got the follow-up Otavio
promised). Here's a draft of what I think is needed, we'd appreciate if
you (-boot) could go over it, both the general lines and the details,
and tell
* Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es [2009-01-16 11:32]:
Now, for the less easy part: code that gets embedded. Steve Langasek has
kindly provided us with an initial draft for the list of packages that
should be checked [2]. This is a subset of D-I's build-dependencies,
Why are they a subset of
* Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com [2009-01-16 12:07]:
Now, for the less easy part: code that gets embedded. Steve Langasek has
kindly provided us with an initial draft for the list of packages that
should be checked [2]. This is a subset of D-I's build-dependencies,
Why are they a subset
* Martin Michlmayr [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:07:06 +0100]:
* Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es [2009-01-16 11:32]:
Now, for the less easy part: code that gets embedded. Steve Langasek has
kindly provided us with an initial draft for the list of packages that
should be checked [2]. This is a
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:32:12 +0100]:
The easy part is the handling of udeb-providing packages: we we'll just
wait, as usual, for d-i RM ack/nack before unblocking. If an update
*must* get through, and d-i RM acks it, we'll just copy the previous
version to a special suite as it
On Fri, 16, Jan, 2009 at 12:21:14PM +0100, Adeodato Simó spoke thus..
Btw, I don't know if it'd be a viable approach or not, but I'll mention
it nevertheless: I wonder if for squeeze we should do the debian-installer
uploads to t-p-u instead of unstable. We would still have to ensure
source
* Mark Hymers [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:34:13 +]:
The other option, which I've been thinking about for a while, would be
to allow binary packages (deb or udeb) to declare a field such as:
Source-Depends: foo (= 1.2-1)
We could then teach dak to hang on to source packages for as long as
* Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es [2009-01-16 12:12]:
Frans' original message [1] didn't mention anything about that. He did
mention, though, stuff coming from udebs from testing. Can it be that
qcontrol and micro-evtd are grabbed from testing when building the
installer?
Yes, you're right.
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:32:12 +0100]:
Regarding those packages not in sync, both arcboot and mkvmlinuz are a
translation-only upload, so I'll unblock them. As for gcc-4.3, I think
4.3.2-2 is Lenny material, I'll check with doko.
As a third follow-up, here's a list of *all* d-i
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:32:53 +0100]:
As a third follow-up, here's a list of *all* d-i build-dependencies
Which uncovered a bug in the script; please find the latest version
here:
http://git.debian.org/?p=tools-release/release.git;a=blob;f=scripts/d-i_bdep-sync;hb=HEAD
And
Quoting Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org:
Well, as the release more or less depends on the installer, we can
delay its release..:-)
Sabotage! :~)
I can commit what I have right now. That will anyway be bette rthan
what we have now.
OK, go ahead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
severity 511842 normal
tags 511842 unreproducible
thanks
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Pyotr Berezhkov wrote:
Comments/Problems:
The installer's partitioner appears to be unable to handle the
situation where an LVM partition already exists on one of the
computer's disks at the time of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 511842 normal
Bug#511842: installation-reports: Pre-existing LVM partition crashes the
partitioner
Severity set to `normal' from `important'
tags 511842 unreproducible
Bug#511842: installation-reports: Pre-existing LVM partition
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Jonathan Quick wrote:
While playing with the DHCP preseeding method for the installer in
'auto' mode, I discovered that the 20090112-20:05 daily i386 netboot
image now asks for a preseed/url despite it being specified by the DHCP
server - presumeably the check for a
United Nations Foundation
Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20036
Dear Sir/Madam,
UN Foundation Grant.
This is to notify you that you have been chosen by the board of Trustees of the
above International (Charity Human Developmental Organization) as one of the
final
On 16 Jan 09, Frans Pop wrote:
This is where is crashed is not very specific. Please describe the
excact steps you performed after starting the partitioner and indicate
when exactly the crash happened.
I don't see any crash in the first syslog, at most a hang (from looking
at the output
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
Hello,
this is a very late follow-up, but apparently just in time, to [1]. I'm
very sorry about the delay (though I never got the follow-up Otavio
promised). Here's a draft of what I think is needed, we'd appreciate if
you (-boot) could go over it,
Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org writes:
(sorry for appearing to push hard, here)
- 2.6.26-13 kernel upload and subsequent kernel udebs uploads
Any plans for the kernel udebs uploads, Otavio?
Any help you might need doing that?
I'l be mostly unavailable as of Friday-Saturday but
Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com writes:
* Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com [2009-01-14 08:59]:
arm hasn't finished building but I think it should finish RSN. (The
build had to be started again because there was a temporary problem.)
arm is done now.
Is it signed already? It doesn't look
* Adeodato Simó [Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:32:12 +0100]:
Hello,
And hi yet again...
package|source | testing | unstable | ok
---+---+---+---+-
libgcc1 | gcc-4.3 | 4.3.2-1.1 |
* Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org [2009-01-15 09:14]:
arm is done now.
Is it signed already? It doesn't look installed.
It's installed and on Debian mirrors; maybe your mirror is behind.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26etch1
retitle 509299 problem with boot drive != system drive
Bug#509299: installation: Error in Windows-Based Debial Installation
Changed Bug title to `problem with boot drive !=
Gostaria de sabe se é possível e como fazer para limitar a taxa de download
por ip numa rede.
Minha versão é o Debian GUN/Linux 4.0
Obrigado.
4minuti.it
/*stile per il body*/
body,html {
text-align: center; /*centra in IE 5.x */
background-image: url('http://www.4minuti.it/images/sfondo_pagina.jpg');
background-attachment: fixed;
font-family:Verdana;
margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;
}
a.titolo{
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-
builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
07-Jan-2009
UPDATE 2: Partition Numbering Issue Explained
In the initial report and the first update, I noted that during
On Fri, January 16, 2009 6:57 pm, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Jonathan Quick wrote:
While playing with the DHCP preseeding method for the installer in
'auto' mode, I discovered that the 20090112-20:05 daily i386 netboot
image now asks for a preseed/url despite it being
28 matches
Mail list logo
