On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
$ dpkg -l linux-libc-dev | grep ^ii
ii linux-libc-dev 2.6.32-10
ok I have similar, the 2.6.32-9 verison on amd64,
so should work fine.
Still get the same errors with
ii libklibc 1.5.17-2 minimal libc subset for
On Sunday 21 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
$ dpkg -l linux-libc-dev | grep ^ii
ii linux-libc-dev 2.6.32-10
ok I have similar, the 2.6.32-9 verison on amd64,
so should work fine.
Still get the same errors with
ii
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
ok would need info on the missing symlinks:
ls -l /usr/lib/klibc/include/linux
and
ls -l /usr/lib/klibc/include/asm*
I think that's the problem. They're not symlinks, but empty directories.
Looks like a bug in the upgrade?
$ ls -dl
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 02:35:06PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
$ dpkg -l linux-libc-dev | grep ^ii
ii linux-libc-dev 2.6.32-10
ok I have similar, the 2.6.32-9 verison on
On Sunday 21 March 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
I think that's the problem. They're not symlinks, but empty directories.
A purge and re-install gets me symlinks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
rootskel_1.84_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.84.dsc
rootskel_1.84.tar.gz
rootskel_1.84_armel.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.84_armel.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.84_armel.udeb
to main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.84_armel.udeb
rootskel_1.84.dsc
to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.84.dsc
rootskel_1.84.tar.gz
to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.84.tar.gz
rootskel_1.84_armel.udeb
to main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.84_armel.udeb
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 03:23:45PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
ok would need info on the missing symlinks:
ls -l /usr/lib/klibc/include/linux
and
ls -l /usr/lib/klibc/include/asm*
I think that's the problem. They're not symlinks, but
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
please reportbug
Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003211850.24933.elen...@planet.nl
I'm seriously.. VERY seriously enraged by the very thought of Debian
moving to preconfigure and install Recommends by default. This is the
worst decision Debian could ever make. That very one thing is one of my
biggest complaints about Ubuntu doing so and strongly /VERY/ strongly
insist it not
[ Gismo: don't know if you have seen this, CCing you because you were
also interested on working on this.
debian-boot: Thibaut showed interest on the pkg-fso-maint list to work
on d-i for the Neo Freerunner as a Google Summer of Code project. Your
input would be welcome as well. ]
Hi Thibaut
On
On Sunday 21 March 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I and Luca Capello (gismo) worked on d-i for the freerunner at Debconf
9. We decided back then that whatever method we choose it should be
supported by the factory default settings of the u-boot on the
freerunner.
I'm currently working on
Regarding the FreeRunner, I've got one since the beginning of the year,
and I use it as my sole phone.
I have flashed SHR unstable on the NAND, and I've manually (reading the
so-called install.sh script) installed Debian on a µSD card, although I
rarely
use it.
For porting d-i to
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 06:50:24PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
please reportbug
Done.
fixed in 1.5.17-4, will ask to unblock this one for testing migration
soon. any current constraints concerning that timeline from d-i?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 21 March 2010 17:00
Machine: Dell Vostro 430
Partitions: Didn't get that far in the
On Sunday 21 March 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
fixed in 1.5.17-4, will ask to unblock this one for testing migration
soon. any current constraints concerning that timeline from d-i?
Nope. We currently don't have any boot floppies, so rootskel-bootfloppy
isn't really used.
But we should
Oops, forgot the attachment.
Julian
installation-files.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
Please keep debian-boot in the loop at least as long this is alos about
d-i.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:45:14PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Then we need a kernel configuration for the s3c24xx architecture and a
patch to enable an image for this architecture for linux-2.6. The kernel
On Monday 22 March 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Frans opinion seems to be that it's possible to commit changes to d-i
even if we use an external kernel. At Debconf9 I got the impression that
this is not what the d-i team wants.
But I've also said that it depends on the changes.
--
To
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 04:37:57PM -0400, Eric Renfro wrote:
I'm seriously.. VERY seriously enraged by the very thought of Debian
moving to preconfigure and install Recommends by default. This is
the worst decision Debian could ever make. That very one thing is
one of my biggest complaints
As part of the transition to parted 2.2, I made a few changes to
partman-base to take advantage of its new facilities. I'm sending a
description here since they're non-trivial.
partman-base (140) unstable; urgency=low
* Don't warn about data loss on formatted/removed partitions when there
partman-base_140_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_140.dsc
partman-base_140.tar.gz
partman-base_140_i386.udeb
partman-utils_140_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Accepted:
partman-base_140.dsc
to main/p/partman-base/partman-base_140.dsc
partman-base_140.tar.gz
to main/p/partman-base/partman-base_140.tar.gz
partman-base_140_i386.udeb
to main/p/partman-base/partman-base_140_i386.udeb
partman-utils_140_i386.udeb
to
Your message dated Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:23:14 +
with message-id e1ntvqi-0002di...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#539908: fixed in partman-base 140
has caused the Debian Bug report #539908,
regarding partman: libparted says File system alias linux-swap(new) is
deprecated
to be marked as
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use
partconf_1.33_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partconf_1.33.dsc
partconf_1.33.tar.gz
partconf-find-partitions_1.33_i386.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_1.33_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To
Accepted:
partconf-find-partitions_1.33_i386.udeb
to main/p/partconf/partconf-find-partitions_1.33_i386.udeb
partconf-mkfstab_1.33_i386.udeb
to main/p/partconf/partconf-mkfstab_1.33_i386.udeb
partconf_1.33.dsc
to main/p/partconf/partconf_1.33.dsc
partconf_1.33.tar.gz
to
Quoting Eric Renfro (eren...@gmail.com):
I have been a Debian user since way back when, and I completely
disagree with this decision. Recommends should NOT be treated as if
Playing the I've been in this game for long with some people in this
list is probably a bad idea and you're very
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
Regarding the FreeRunner, I've got one since the beginning of the year,
and I use it as my sole phone.
I have flashed SHR unstable on the NAND, and I've manually (reading the
so-called install.sh script) installed Debian on a µSD card,
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Well, I have one at home, which I don't use. So, in case it would
help porting Debian, I could happily lend it to Thibaut
I just read that Thibaut said it wouldn't be a problem for him. But,
anyway, my offer still stands for anyone who
30 matches
Mail list logo
