Hi, Gaudenz. I am planning to integrate a patch to hw-detect from
Ubuntu, which installs the mouseemu package by default on Mac machines
likely to only have one mouse button. But I notice the Ubuntu version
of mouseemu have a lot of fixes that are missing in the Debian
package, and that it is 3
Your message dated Sun, 23 May 2010 11:59:58 +0200
with message-id 20100523095958.gu4...@login1.uio.no
and subject line Re: hw-detect: hw-detect new device detection misbehaves with
wlan* devices
has caused the Debian Bug report #495676,
regarding hw-detect: hw-detect new device detection
Hi Petter
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:40:39AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Hi, Gaudenz. I am planning to integrate a patch to hw-detect from
Ubuntu, which installs the mouseemu package by default on Mac machines
likely to only have one mouse button. But I notice the Ubuntu version
of
[Joey Hess]
AFAICS, hdparm is only installed via the laptop task, which pulls in
acpi-support, which depends on hdparm. But there is need for hdparm
on many other systems.
OK. Do you propose to install it on all systems, or only some? If
some, how do you propose to detect which system need
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 12:26:45PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Gaudenz Steinlin]
I'm not sure if mouseemu (at least in it's current status) should be
activated by default on these machines. I'd prefer to have the two
and three finger tapping acivated by default instead.
OK. How
[Gaudenz Steinlin]
I'm not sure if mouseemu (at least in it's current status) should be
activated by default on these machines. I'd prefer to have the two
and three finger tapping acivated by default instead.
OK. How is this multifinger tapping activated? How can machines with
such touchpad
(Dropping -release, which isn't a discussion list.)
William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org (22/05/2010):
Given that there is no active upstream and that the Debian lilo
package carries many patches for bug fixes that are alleviated by
standardizing on grub2, this seems like the best option
[Gaudenz Steinlin]
AFAIK there are severyl possible ways:
- synclient (only runtime configuration)
- statically in Xorg.conf
- with the gnome-control-panel (and possible by setting some gconf keys)
Right. I guess all of these should be handled outside the installer,
and will limit hw-detect
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 01:11:48PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
William Pitcock neno...@dereferenced.org (22/05/2010):
This means that users should *test grub2 extensively* before Squeeze
is released so that any issues can be resolved now.
There should also be some folks fixing the
Hi,
recently #574116 (and #574158) were fixed in sid and IMO it would be very nice
to have this patch in lenny too. So I wonder if this is possible and if the
SRMs would accept it.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi all,
Let me first thank you for your work which has made using the great
Debian operating system possible! :-)
I faced a problem in using Debian Squeeze recently which you should be
aware of it by now but I'm writing you anyway to make sure it gets
resolved sooner (if it is not yet).
[Nima Azarbayjany]
I faced a problem in using Debian Squeeze recently which you should be
aware of it by now but I'm writing you anyway to make sure it gets
resolved sooner (if it is not yet).
Very good.
The problem is that using the installer's default partitioning
scheme nearly 5Gb is
On Sat, 22 May 2010 23:39:52 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
After some discussion about lilo on #debian-devel in IRC, it has pretty
much been determined that kernel sizes have crossed the line past where
lilo can reliably determine the payload size.
This bug *can* be fixed, but not
Hi,
- Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
(blah blah blah blah)
Nobody cares if you are opposed to it. Unless you are offering to become
lilo upstream, it's going away.
William
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:11:30 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
(blah blah blah blah)
Nobody cares if you are opposed to it. Unless you are offering to become
lilo upstream, it's going away.
William
I do understand why a Debian package
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Stephen Powell wrote:
But withdrawing it from the distribution seems like overkill to me,
especially since you want to withdraw it from Squeeze and not
Squeeze+1. Lilo, as it exists today, works just fine for my
purposes.
If the maintainer doesn't wish to maintain it for
16 matches
Mail list logo
