hi all:
I want to build all the udeb packages, but I couldn't confirm the udeb
source packages list and udeb packages list which use by debian installer.
How can I get all the udeb source packages list?
As far as I know now:
different architecture the source package may is different
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 608996 + pending
Bug #608996 [partman-target] debian-installer: reference to vol_id in
/etc/fstab should be replaced by blkid
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
608996:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:07:38PM +0800, Qin Bo wrote:
I want to build all the udeb packages, but I couldn't confirm the udeb
source packages list and udeb packages list which use by debian installer.
How can I get all the udeb source packages list?
As far as I know now:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 04:01, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Goal: stop having a daily mail about failed builds asthis just
makes everybody ignore them after a few days.
We might try to have this mail reversed sorted by failure date. So the
most recent failure will always be
howto build a netinst with a new 2.6.36 kernel?
newer 6gb sas/sata raid-controllers are not supported in the actual
2.6.32 kernel but in the 2.6.36 like the areca 18x series;
i tried to build a custom netinst with packages from the squeeze
repository what is not the problem because alle the
debian-installer_20110106_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20110106.dsc
debian-installer_20110106.tar.gz
debian-installer_20110106_amd64.deb
debian-installer-images_20110106_amd64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
/debian-installer/debian-installer_20110106_amd64.deb
Changes: debian-installer (20110106) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Use SpaceFun theme. Closes #603554.
* Update Linux kernel to 2.6.32-29.
Override entries for your package:
debian-installer_20110106.dsc - source devel
debian
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:32:07 +
with message-id e1path1-0005iy...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#602421: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.52
has caused the Debian Bug report #602421,
regarding 'DVD set' scan, debian-squeeze-di-beta1-i386-DVD-2 label missing from
install screen.
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:32:07 +
with message-id e1path1-0005iy...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#602421: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.52
has caused the Debian Bug report #602421,
regarding installation-reports: Squeeze Installation - apt does not appear to
be scanning
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:32:07 +
with message-id e1path1-0005iy...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#602421: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.52
has caused the Debian Bug report #602421,
regarding installation : disk set analysis
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
reopen 608641
Bug #608641 {Done: Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org} [debian-installer]
debian-installer: Debian installer lose its mind when doing again the process
apt-setup_0.52_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.52.dsc
apt-setup_0.52.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.52_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.52_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.52_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.52_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.52_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.52_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.52_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.52_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.52_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.52.dsc
to
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
reopen 608641
reassign 608641 cdebconf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu
---
packages/netcfg/dhcp.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c b/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c
index 385799b..ce93b26 100644
--- a/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c
+++ b/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c
@@ -133,8
Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu
---
packages/netcfg/dhcp.c | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c b/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c
index f706c5c..385799b 100644
--- a/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c
+++ b/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c
@@
Hi,
Turns out my problem wasn't exactly network card specific, but somehow
more deeply related to the surrounding network switch configurations.
Anyhow, the concrete problem was that udhcpc sent out 3 DHCPDISCOVER
packets only in the first couple of seconds, then spent its remaining
time before
As long as all pointers are of the same size (as usual), this doesn't
make a difference.
Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu
---
packages/netcfg/dhcp.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c b/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c
index
Your message dated Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:37:08 +
with message-id 1294349828.2683.0.ca...@eeepc.belkin
and subject line This was fixed by #378868.
has caused the Debian Bug report #394993,
regarding apt-setup should clean up its mess
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of Don Jan 06 07:01:07 +0100 2011:
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org):
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:mipsel Dec 09 00:12 bui...@rem
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 09:17:34AM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
2) Next, apt-setup uses apt-cdrom ident to identify the additionally supplied
CDs. According to elmig from #debian-cd, apt-cdrom from debian 5.0.7 release
correctly scans squeeze discs, while apt-cdrom from squeeze's cdrom only
Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of Don Jan 06 12:32:20 +0100 2011:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 04:01, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Goal: stop having a daily mail about failed builds asthis just
makes everybody ignore them after a few days.
We might try to have this
Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes:
-execvp(udhcpc, arguments);
+/* execvp doesn't like const strings for no reason, so we can
+ cast away the const to suppress the compiler warning */
+execvp(udhcpc, (char **)arguments);
Actually, I started
Your message dated Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:19:50 +
with message-id 1294359590.2683.2.ca...@eeepc.belkin
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #599115,
regarding debian-installer: grub's target examples still reflect grub-legacy's
behavior
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:mipsel Dec 09 00:12 bui...@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log
* OLD BUILD:mipsel Dec
You can get back to the source
package by looking up the binary package in the relevant Packages list and
getting the Source header from there (I'm sure someone will be nice and
give
you a grep-dctrl snippet to do that, but I'm not grep-dctrl qualified).
Relevant Packages list is a
[DON'T CC PEOPLE WHO HAVE REPLIED TO THE LIST]
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:02:31AM +0800, Qin Bo wrote:
You can get back to the source
package by looking up the binary package in the relevant Packages list and
getting the Source header from there (I'm sure someone will be nice and
give
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:31:07AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu writes:
-execvp(udhcpc, arguments);
+/* execvp doesn't like const strings for no reason, so we can
+ cast away the const to suppress the compiler warning */
+
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:32:02PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner wf...@niif.hu
---
packages/netcfg/dhcp.c | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c b/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c
index f706c5c..385799b
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
Excerpts from Otavio Salvador's message of Don Jan 06 12:32:20 +0100 2011:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 04:01, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Goal: stop having a daily mail about failed builds asthis just
makes everybody ignore
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
I got one reply that the first mails had been overlooked and the
person said to be on semi-VAC currently. After that the conversation
died off. I don't think Geert is interested anymore and this build
should be moved to a sparc buildd. As there
31 matches
Mail list logo
