[Taking this off-bug]
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 07:36:54AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I indeed wonder it if would make sense to switch the i-g to git once
> it is released.
I think it would be worthwhile -- at the moment I'm queueing up changes to
make to the manual, which just feels like it
Quoting Matthew Palmer (mpal...@debian.org):
> * The installation manual appendix on available preseedable options must be
> updated to include this variable, with some meaningful documentation.
Beware that the installation guide is not in git, so branching for
wheezy might be mor edifficult.
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > I'd like to announce that I've managed to put together a set of changes to
> > netcfg (and busybox) to allow d-i to perform a complete install over the
> > network without any traffic flowing over IPv4.
> >
> >
>
> Well, let me be
Quoting Matthew Palmer (mpal...@debian.org):
> I'm leaning very heavily towards "sorry, nothing can be grouped due to
> netcfg's advanced intelligence" and closing the bug report.
I'm all for it. Let's not break this advanced intelligence that's in
place for years for a debatable UI "improvement
> The problem with this idea is that debootstrap can be used:
>
> - to bootstrap on another distribution, which won't have that keyring
> - to bootstrap one Debian or derivative on another, so that keyring
> will be present but not have the right keys in it
> - to bootstrap unstable on stable, so
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:04:59AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > * You can't (properly) use SLAAC to configure your IPv6 network (you can
> > skip the gateway question, but you need to put in a static IP and that'll
> > get stuck into /e/n/interfaces).
>
> Hmm, my experie
david b wrote:
> Package: debootstrap
> Severity: wishlist
>
> When building a debian vm, using live-magic etc. it is common to use
> debootstrap.
> When the --keyring argument is omitted, as per the man page, "Release file
> signatures are not checked."
> IMHO this behaviour differs from the 'n
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 610739 installation-guide
Bug #610739 [debian-installer] Preseed: Debian Installer ignores grub-legacy
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'installation-guide'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/2011
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I'd like to announce that I've managed to put together a set of changes to
> netcfg (and busybox) to allow d-i to perform a complete install over the
> network without any traffic flowing over IPv4.
>
>
Well, let me be apparently the first to congradulate you. This is pre
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log
* OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:10 didaily@c3700 build_netboot
Package: debootstrap
Severity: wishlist
When building a debian vm, using live-magic etc. it is common to use
debootstrap.
When the --keyring argument is omitted, as per the man page, "Release file
signatures are not checked."
IMHO this behaviour differs from the 'normal' use of secure apt (by de
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.59
Severity: wishlist
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: gift
With the closing of #414117, we've introduced a more robust method of
detecting which network interfaces we want to configure have link. This is
required because link autonegotiation (and other associ
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> # via tagpending
> #
> # netcfg (1.60) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Wait for up to 3 seconds (in 0.25s increments) looking for the link on
> #an interface. Add
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
# via tagpending
#
# netcfg (1.60) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Wait for up to 3 seconds (in 0.25s increments) looking for the link on
#an interface. Add a progress bar to show the progress of this
#operation. C
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:01:35PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> One grouping that I see could be done a hostname/domainname combination.
> I usually don't fill the domainname, so just filling the hostname and
> pressing enter is fine.
Which, in practice, is a dependent pair -- if you enter an F
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+b1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
i have found another bug. The Debian Installer ignores the parameter
"d-i grub-installer/grub2_instead_of_grub_legacy" and installs grub2
instead of grub-legacy.
Regards, Dennis
Contents of the preconfiguration file (f
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 558036 kernel-wedge
Bug #558036 [mmc-modules-2.6.30-2-486-di] mmc-modules-2.6.30-2-486-di doesn't
include sdhci-pci.ko
Warning: Unknown package 'mmc-modules-2.6.30-2-486-di'
Bug reassigned from package 'mmc-modules-2.6.30-2-486-di' to 'k
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:50:37 +0100
with message-id <20110121195037.gp12...@sym.noone.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#609733: installation-reports: UltraSparc 10 doesn't
find its CD-ROM drive
has caused the Debian Bug report #609733,
regarding installation-reports: UltraSparc 10 doesn
Hello,
I have tested this image.
This build finished at Fri Jan 21 09:12:54 UTC 2011.
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/sparc/iso-cd/debian-testing-sparc-netinst.iso
It still has the same problem.
console [tty0] enabled, bootconsole disabled
after this nothing
Hello,
I have tested this image.
This build finished at Fri Jan 21 09:12:54 UTC 2011.
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/sparc/iso-cd/debian-testing-sparc-netinst.iso
It still has the same problem.
console [tty0] enabled, bootconsole disabled
after this nothing
On 01/21/2011 11:35 AM, Christophe Schockaert wrote:
> So, I followed what's here for a network install:
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch04s03.html
Following "4.3.1. Copying the files — the easy way", I assume? Please
indicate the URLs used for download of boot.img.gz and the iso.
Hello Matthew,
Am 20.01.2011 02:16, schrieb Matthew Palmer:
> I'm having some trouble reproducing your bug report.
>
> Here are the exact steps I took:
>
> 1) Download the mini.iso from
> http://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-i386/20090123lenny8/images/netboot/
> (
Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
> On Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 15:02:30 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> Matthew Palmer writes:
>>
>>> Just for the record, the difference between the size of the binary in
>>> busybox-udeb 1.17.1-9 (as is currently in git) when built on i386 with and
>>> without vconfig is
Hello Samuel,
Am 20.01.2011 18:47, schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Dennis Hoppe, le Thu 20 Jan 2011 09:57:32 +0100, a écrit :
>> Am 20.01.2011 01:44, schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>>> Christian PERRIER, le Wed 19 Jan 2011 18:29:33 +0100, a écrit :
Quoting Dennis Hoppe (dennis.ho...@credativ.de):
>
Hi all,
I am a recent newcomer on this list...
I am trying to start the new RC1 debian-installer
(http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110113) to install Debian on an Asus
netbook from a USB stick.
I could perform a successfull install with Ubuntu and Trisquel through
USB, but I am trying to do it
Hi,
On Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 15:02:30 +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Matthew Palmer writes:
>
> > Just for the record, the difference between the size of the binary in
> > busybox-udeb 1.17.1-9 (as is currently in git) when built on i386 with and
> > without vconfig is 384 bytes.
>
> I wonder if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 610116 grub-installer
Bug #610116 [installation-reports] grub incorrectly installed when specifying
empty grub-installer/bootdev
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'grub-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
reassign 610116 grub-installer
thanks
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=zyhkdv5wa5bps-+pz2lvrgw6bwd7fhwchm...@mail.gmail.com
Matthew Palmer writes:
> Just for the record, the difference between the size of the binary in
> busybox-udeb 1.17.1-9 (as is currently in git) when built on i386 with and
> without vconfig is 384 bytes.
I wonder if you really need this after all. vconfig is deprecated, and
even the current squ
Miguel Figueiredo, le Fri 21 Jan 2011 13:16:53 +, a écrit :
> > Actually, I don't even understand why people prefer to see questions
> > grouped. I personally prefer to type foo[ENTER]bar[ENTER], rather than
> > having to tab between elements, or find out how things are supposed to
> > be separ
On 01/21/2011 02:32 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Assuming your back from [VAC], is there any news from this?
like i said[0].. i'm on the last steps of testing and upload RSN.
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/01/msg00583.html
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3
On dim., 2011-01-16 at 08:49 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 01/13/2011 10:52 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Is there anything that still needs to happen on the syslinux side
>
> yes.
>
> > if so, could it either happen soon or for 6.0.1, please? :)
>
> like i said[0], after my vac[1].
>
> [0
Sex, 2011-01-21 às 11:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault escreveu:
[...]
This is clearly an design/usability issue and it's great that is being
discussed in the beginning of the next release and not when people want
to focus on (technical) development.
There are several wishlists on this and even the d-i
Christian PERRIER, le Fri 21 Jan 2011 06:46:44 +0100, a écrit :
> Quoting Matthew Palmer (mpal...@debian.org):
> > I'm triaging netcfg bugs. Bear with me on this archaeological endeavour.
> >
> > Like Joey Hess, I'm having trouble identifying questions that can be grouped
> > together. Even the
Quoting Matthew Palmer (mpal...@debian.org):
> tag 186029 +moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm triaging netcfg bugs. Bear with me on this archaeological endeavour.
>
> Like Joey Hess, I'm having trouble identifying questions that can be grouped
> together. Even the IP address/netmask questions a
35 matches
Mail list logo