Re: Software speech synthesis in d-i

2011-05-10 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): > Hello, > > Software speech synthesis is almost there in d-i. I'm just waiting for > portaudio19 to fix a small bug, and then with rootskel and > linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 uploads I'll be able to upload espeakup-udeb > and make use of it in d-i. > >

Software speech synthesis in d-i

2011-05-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Software speech synthesis is almost there in d-i. I'm just waiting for portaudio19 to fix a small bug, and then with rootskel and linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 uploads I'll be able to upload espeakup-udeb and make use of it in d-i. Now the question is: how to let the user select it? I've attac

Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2011-05-10 Thread Daily build aggregator
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_generic http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_tape

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

2011-05-10 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:16:52AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: >Hi, > >2011/5/10 Hector Oron : >> 2011/5/10 Philipp Kern : > >>> If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it >>> there, too.  Otherwise most is explained in [1]. > >> Thanks very much! >> Could you do the

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

2011-05-10 Thread Hector Oron
Hi, 2011/5/10 Hector Oron : > 2011/5/10 Philipp Kern : >> If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it >> there, too.  Otherwise most is explained in [1]. > Thanks very much! > Could you do the setup, now that you are at it on alain.debian.org, > otherwise ping me?

Bug#626299: debian-installer: installer broken on armel - "Can't check signature: public key not found"

2011-05-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gerd [2011-05-10 19:51]: > May 10 17:29:44 choose-mirror[1718]: INFO: suite/codename set to: > stable/squeeze > May 10 17:29:44 choose-mirror[1718]: DEBUG: command: wget -q > http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian//dists/squeeze/main/binary-armel/Release -O > - | grep ^Architecture: > May 10 17:29:

Bug#626299: debian-installer: installer broken on armel - "Can't check signature: public key not found"

2011-05-10 Thread Gerd
Package: debian-installer Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.8 Installs for armel (on QNAP TS-219) fails because the Release signature cannot be verified. From the syslog: May 10 17:29:43 choose-mirror[1718]: DEBUG: command: wget -q http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian//dists/oldstable/Rele

Re: Relicence of Debian Installer components under GPLv3 or v2+?

2011-05-10 Thread Joey Hess
Christian PERRIER wrote: > What could be the right approach about this? Contact everybody listed > in debian/copyright? Look at the commit history and contact everybody > who once did a commit? You'd have to contact everyone who contributed code or other significant stuff. -- see shy jo sign

Re: Relicence of Debian Installer components under GPLv3 or v2+?

2011-05-10 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org): > So am I. FWIW, the majority of components are already licensed version 2 > or higher. These are licensed v2 only: Aha, this is an input I was awaiting for. Thanks, Joey..:-) If you said no, I would probably have abandoned the idea. What could be the right

Re: Relicence of Debian Installer components under GPLv3 or v2+?

2011-05-10 Thread Joey Hess
Christian PERRIER wrote: > I'm just sitting at the annual Samba conference, listening to > B. Kuhn's talk about GPL enforcement and v2/v3 issues (samba is known > to be the first major project to move to GPLv3). > > So, well, just a random idea: would it be such a weird idea to try > moving the l

MIPS D-I daily build failure (was kfreebsd-{amd64|i386} D-I daily build failures)

2011-05-10 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 06:40:23AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > This mail is a small "up" mail to mention that I'm still monitoring > the daily reports of the daily buils aggregator. > > There's always something that's going wrong so the task is > harder...even harder because I do this offlin

Relicence of Debian Installer components under GPLv3 or v2+?

2011-05-10 Thread Christian PERRIER
I'm just sitting at the annual Samba conference, listening to B. Kuhn's talk about GPL enforcement and v2/v3 issues (samba is known to be the first major project to move to GPLv3). So, well, just a random idea: would it be such a weird idea to try moving the licence for various D-I components to

Processed: Re: Bug#626220: Did not support Intel 82579LM Gigabit Ethernet (needs current e1000e)

2011-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 626220 linux-2.6 Bug #626220 [debian-installer] Did not support Intel 82579LM Gigabit Ethernet (needs current e1000e) Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'linux-2.6'. > forcemerge 624794 626220 Bug#624794: Missing support f

Bug#626220: Did not support Intel 82579LM Gigabit Ethernet (needs current e1000e)

2011-05-10 Thread Bastian Blank
reassign 626220 linux-2.6 forcemerge 624794 626220 thanks On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:08:47AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org): > > I recently installed Debian stable on a Lenovo ThinkPad X220. This > > laptop has the following ethernet controller: >

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

2011-05-10 Thread Steve McIntyre
Joey Hess wrote: >Philipp Kern wrote: >> This requires a bunch of changes and I'm not aware of all places that need to >> be fixed to refer to a new daily build location. But maybe someone else >> knows >> and can do it. >> >> If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can inst

Bug#626220: Did not support Intel 82579LM Gigabit Ethernet (needs current e1000e)

2011-05-10 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org): > Package: debian-installer > Severity: normal > > I recently installed Debian stable on a Lenovo ThinkPad X220. This > laptop has the following ethernet controller: > > 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network > Conne

Bug#626226: marked as done (d-1: serial console woes)

2011-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2011 09:06:29 +0200 with message-id <20110510070629.gr3...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> and subject line Re: Bug#626226: Found the fix. Sorry to bother you... has caused the Debian Bug report #626226, regarding d-1: serial console woes to be marked as done. This mean

Re: CONFIG_NLS=y in 2.6.39 packages (Was Re: [PATCH base-installer] Update i386 kernel selection for new flavours in wheezy)

2011-05-10 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 03:58 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:36 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 05:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 08:38 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >