Bug#636812: debian-installer: wrong keyboard layout for Serbian language

2011-08-10 Thread Christian PERRIER
clone 636812 console-data retitle 636812 Should use sr keymap in D-I when language is Serbian (cyrillic or not) thanks Quoting Karolina Kalic (karol...@resenje.org): I've never seen that there are keyboards with cyrillic layout selling in Serbia. I couldn't find it on the internet neither,

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#636812: debian-installer: wrong keyboard layout for Serbian language

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 636812 console-data Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. retitle 636812 Should use sr keymap in D-I when language is Serbian (cyrillic or not) Bug #636812 [debian-installer] debian-installer: wrong keyboard layout for

Processed: r612 - in trunk/debian: . po udeb

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 636812 pending Bug #636812 [debian-installer] Should use sr keymap in D-I when language is Serbian (cyrillic or not) Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 636812:

Bug#636812: debian-installer: wrong keyboard layout for Serbian language

2011-08-10 Thread Christian PERRIER
reassign 636812 console-data retitle 636812 Should use sr keymap in D-I when language is Serbian (cyrillic or not) thanks Errors in my former BTS manipulation...:) reassign, not clone.. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#636812: debian-installer: wrong keyboard layout for Serbian language

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 636812 console-data Bug #636812 [debian-installer] Should use sr keymap in D-I when language is Serbian (cyrillic or not) Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'console-data'. retitle 636812 Should use sr keymap in D-I when

Processed: Re: Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 637284 installation-reports Bug #637284 [wnpp] Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac Bug reassigned from package 'wnpp' to 'installation-reports'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637284:

Bug#637289: installation-reports: Installation Debian Wheezy weekly-builds 08-08-2011 text=successful gui=not good

2011-08-10 Thread Luis Guzman
Package: installation-reports Severity: important Successful installation of Debian Wheezy/Testing on Dell D430 via USB flash drive. Burnt the iso image to USB after reading the manual to use the command: cat debian.iso /dev/sdX. Successful booting from USB stick and presented with all options:

Bug#637289: marked as done (installation-reports: Installation Debian Wheezy weekly-builds 08-08-2011 text=successful gui=not good)

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:27:43 +0100 with message-id 201108101027.43816.el...@debianpt.org and subject line Re: Bug#637289: installation-reports: Installation Debian Wheezy weekly-builds 08-08-2011 text=successful gui=not good has caused the Debian Bug report #637289, regarding

Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac

2011-08-10 Thread Mike Hore
On 10/08/11 6:55 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote: reassign 637284 installation-reports thanks Installation reports (failure or success) should not be reported against the Work Needing and Prospective Packages virtual package, but against installation-reports. Ah, thanks Gergely -- I'm still new to

Re: Resync netcfg in D-I git?

2011-08-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 11:01:22PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of 2011-08-05 09:54:11 +0200: Would you mind, when possible (back from your holidays), resyncing D-I git with the uploaded 1.66 and 1.67 packages? I've now pushed everything into the

Re: cdebconf progress

2011-08-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:44:38AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: I, for one, would vote for uploading to unstable. It is time to test *now*. Closer to wheezy release might be too laste. Agreed, just go for unstable and (obviously) be responsive in case of breakage. If you think the changes

Re: cdebconf progress

2011-08-10 Thread Regis Boudin
On Wed, August 10, 2011 11:15, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:44:38AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: I, for one, would vote for uploading to unstable. It is time to test *now*. Closer to wheezy release might be too laste. Agreed, just go for unstable and (obviously) be

Bug#637284: Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac

2011-08-10 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Hi, Very recently Wheezy moved to kernel Linux 3.0, which is being used to install and for the installed system. It would be useful feedback if you test with the current kernel. Can you test and report against such cd images [1] ? 1 -

Bug#629695:

2011-08-10 Thread Andrey Gursky
Hi! Sorry I've discovered this bug report only recently. I'm dealing with this failure since about 4-5 months. And I'm wondering what is the purpose of weekly generated DVD-images when the distribution can't be installed from them during the last 4-5 months? How to reproduce this? It would be

Bug#637297: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2011-08-10 Thread Robert Millan
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.34 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd debootstrap fails to build from source on GNU/kFreeBSD. Please consider attached patch to fix the problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.2 APT prefers

Bug#637298: broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and target=linux

2011-08-10 Thread Robert Millan
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.34 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org While cross-deboostraping a linux-i386 chroot using kfreebsd-amd64 host: $ sudo debootstrap --foreign --arch=i386 squeeze /tmp/test /usr/sbin/debootstrap: 425: cannot create

Bug#637297: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2011-08-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Robert Millan, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 13:36:03 +0200, a écrit : @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ VERSION := $(shell sed 's/.*(\(.*\)).*/\ MAKEDEV := /sbin/MAKEDEV -ifneq ($(shell uname),GNU) +ifeq ($(shell uname),Linux) all: devices.tar.gz else all: Mmm, debootstrap should actually be an Arch:any

Bug#637297: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2011-08-10 Thread Robert Millan
2011/8/10 Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org: Mmm, debootstrap should actually be an Arch:any package then. ATM, if one uploads it from kfreebsd or hurd, Linux systems won't have devices.tar.gz. Yes it should IMO. Note however that my patch isn't a regression in this area. -- Robert

Processed: tagging 637297

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 637297 + pending Bug #637297 [debootstrap] FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 637297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637297 Debian Bug

Processing of debootstrap_1.0.35_i386.changes

2011-08-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
debootstrap_1.0.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To

Bug#637297: marked as done (FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD)

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:17:23 + with message-id e1qr7it-0007wz...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#637297: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35 has caused the Debian Bug report #637297, regarding FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#637298: marked as done (broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and target=linux)

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:17:24 + with message-id e1qr7iu-0007x2...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#637298: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35 has caused the Debian Bug report #637298, regarding broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and target=linux to be

debootstrap_1.0.35_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-08-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb to

Bug#571523: marked as done (debootstrap --foreign should not perform check_sane_mount())

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:59:26 +0200 with message-id caofdtxmq2fkyu+enthb-smrrw+e_aonpkeupnkvbtecteoe...@mail.gmail.com and subject line Re: Bug#637297 closed by Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org (Bug#637297: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35) has caused the Debian Bug report #571523,

Processed: forcibly merging 637298 571523

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 637298 571523 Bug#637298: broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and target=linux Bug#571523: debootstrap --foreign should not perform check_sane_mount() Forcibly Merged 571523 637298. thanks Stopping processing

Bug#637339: debian-installer: Adapt the script to run d-i to the Linkstation Mini.

2011-08-10 Thread Benjamin Cama
Package: debian-installer Version: 20110106+squeeze3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-CC: Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com Hi, Attached is a patch to add support for the Buffalo Linkstation Mini into the script used to run d-i. Reviewed by Martin Michlmayr, I included his suggestions.

Bug#637340: partman-ext3: check for ext[23] /boot on Linkstation Mini too

2011-08-10 Thread Benjamin Cama
Package: partman-ext3 Version: 65 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-CC: Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com Hi, Attached is a patch to add a check for the Buffalo Linkstation Mini as it's being supported by d-i. Linkstation LiveV3 might also be included one day, but I can't test this as I

Re: Bug#637297: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

2011-08-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Mmm, debootstrap should actually be an Arch:any package then. ATM, if one uploads it from kfreebsd or hurd, Linux systems won't have devices.tar.gz. That's a special case of the general problem that there exist Architecture: all

Bug#637339: Debian installer for Buffalo LS Live (LS-CHL) and Mini (LS-WSGL)

2011-08-10 Thread Benjamin Cama
Hi Hector, Le mercredi 10 août 2011 à 16:27 +0100, Hector Oron a écrit : 2011/8/10 Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com: * Benjamin Cama ben...@free.fr [2011-08-04 18:20]: Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok. Sure. Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when

Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Whit Blauvelt
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.35 debootstrap was install per the manual install method in section D.3.2. Install debootstrap of http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apds03.html.en The result: # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian E:

Bug#637366: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Whit Blauvelt
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.35 Follow up on the report I just submitted. # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian E: Couldn't work out current architecture Note that kludging the debootstrap script at line 402 as follows: else #

Bug#637339: Debian installer for Buffalo LS Live (LS-CHL) and Mini (LS-WSGL)

2011-08-10 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2011/8/10 Benjamin Cama ben...@free.fr: Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok. Sure.  Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you file a bug. Patch applied on version control system. Thanks. --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- .

Bug#637366: Acknowledgement (debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system)

2011-08-10 Thread Whit Blauvelt
Please discard this. Resent to the original bug report. Didn't know how your system worked. - Whit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Processed: merging 637366 637363

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: merge 637366 637363 Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system Bug#637366: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system Merged 637363 637366. thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 12:19:36 -0400, a écrit : # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian There is a spurious '/' in front of http:// Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Whit Blauvelt
That's spurious in my report because of not fully undoing my text editor's word wrap feature, which broke the line there and started the second line with # / - I only noticed the # part when I reunited it. Anyway, the bug occurred without the spurious /. Sorry that confused the report. Whit On

Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Whit Blauvelt
Just to verify my memory, I checked the history, and all test invocations indeed were: /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian (aside from also trying --arch amd64) Sorry again for the stray / in the report. Whit -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processing of cdebconf_0.157_amd64.changes

2011-08-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
cdebconf_0.157_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdebconf_0.157.dsc cdebconf_0.157.tar.gz cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb

Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
retitle 637363 should fallback to uname to determine current architecture thanks Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 12:19:36 -0400, a écrit : # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian E: Couldn't work out current architecture Removing the = makes

Bug#442293: marked as done (needs a dpkg-preconfigure)

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:32:17 + with message-id e1qrdzh-0002r5...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#442293: fixed in cdebconf 0.157 has caused the Debian Bug report #442293, regarding needs a dpkg-preconfigure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#451130: marked as done (cdebconf deb does not initalise the template database, which is needed to work out of the box)

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:32:17 + with message-id e1qrdzh-0002rb...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#451130: fixed in cdebconf 0.157 has caused the Debian Bug report #451130, regarding cdebconf deb does not initalise the template database, which is needed to work out of the

Bug#537536: marked as done (missing hacks to run config script, do template autoload, etc)

2011-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:32:17 + with message-id e1qrdzh-0002re...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#537536: fixed in cdebconf 0.157 has caused the Debian Bug report #537536, regarding missing hacks to run config script, do template autoload, etc to be marked as done. This

cdebconf_0.157_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-08-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb

Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:34:12PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: --arch is the target architecture, not the current architecture. It needs the latter to know how to deal with some details. debootstrap should probably resort to uname in such case. Note in the default case (if I understand

Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 15:09:15 -0400, a écrit : On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:34:12PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: --arch is the target architecture, not the current architecture. It needs the latter to know how to deal with some details. debootstrap should probably resort to

Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:13:31PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Also note target is an ambiguous term - the target in normal English is the existing object which receives the new thing That is the meaning here: on which machine you will run the installed debian system. Ah, but when

Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 15:49:23 -0400, a écrit : On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:13:31PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Also note target is an ambiguous term - the target in normal English is the existing object which receives the new thing That is the meaning here: on which

Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Whit Blauvelt
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:36PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: It can't be the target of debootstrap, since debootstrap is already running in it. Think of it (the host, Centos) as the hand which is holding the dart (debootstrap) to the target (the actual machine running the just-installed

Bug#637363: ***SPAM*** Re: Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system

2011-08-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
clone 637363 -1 retitle -1 explain what target means severity -1 wishlist thanks Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 16:21:00 -0400, a écrit : On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:36PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: It can't be the target of debootstrap, since debootstrap is already running in it.

Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2011-08-10 Thread Daily build aggregator
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 11 00:07 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug