On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 13:43 -0600, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
> On 23/02/14 05:58, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 unreproducible
> >
> > On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 21:43 -0600, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
> >> On 05/02/14 11:45, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 12:17 -0500, Elizabeth My
On 23/02/14 05:58, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: tag -1 unreproducible
>
> On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 21:43 -0600, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
>> On 05/02/14 11:45, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 12:17 -0500, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Version: wheezy
Se
On 2014-02-25 17:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (2014-02-13):
>> [...]
>> Failing a short resolution, I'm tempted to pretend sparc isn't an issue,
>> and maybe ask for a migration to testing + dak copy-installer.
>>
>> @debian-release: would that sound reasonable?
>
> Ping?
>
> [..
Hi,
Aurelien Jarno (2014-02-25):
> Yes, we get this bug happening regularly because the binaries on the
> image went through the library reduction process with a given libc (here
> 2.18), and later a different version of the libc is unpacked over it
> (here 2.17). Therefore some symbols are missi
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 02:39:23PM +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois (2014-02-25):
> > Cyril Brulebois (2014-02-25):
> > > It doesn't seem to happen when building against unstable, but it
> > > would be nice to make sure we spot the reason/bugfix and possibly
> > > speed up its
Hi,
2014-02-25 16:31, Cyril Brulebois:
[...]
> > apt.conf(5) require semicolons after closing parentheses as well, so
> > the right syntax would be: […]
>
> This manpage doesn't say that AFAICT. It even points to:
> /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/apt.conf
>
> which ends with:
> DPkg
> {
>
Thank you for your efforts,
I made it past the portion of install to connect to my home WiFi, wlan0, and it
succesfully connected using my WPA2 security code but then.
I was not able to get past the "hostname and domain name" requirement for
installation on my first 3 attempts to install
PRETT
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:45:29PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 09:30 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:10:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 16:18 +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > > Hi Ben,
> > > >
> > > > Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:38:36PM +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [ TL;DR: d-i FTBFS on sparc, what do we do now? ]
>
> Thomas Schmitt (2013-12-10):
> > Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > genisoimage: Error: './tmp/miniiso/cd_tree/boot/.' and
> > > './tmp/miniiso/cd_tree/boot/..' have the same ISO9660
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 09:30 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:10:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 16:18 +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Hi Ben,
> > >
> > > Ben Hutchings (2011-05-16):
> > > > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 17:17 -0700, Josh Triplett wro
Josh Triplett (2014-02-25):
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:10:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I haven't done anything about this and don't expect to do so any
> > time soon.
Alright, thanks for the update.
> > I think the GRUB maintainers are hoping to be able to support ~all
> > our Linux ar
Andrei POPESCU (2014-02-25):
> On Ma, 25 feb 14, 15:10:34, Siarhei Akhramenia wrote:
> > Comments/Problems: Problem with 'Configure mirrors' step; system hangs
> > on scanning CD-ROM (???), looks like it doesn't see any mirrors; the
> > problem also described by me here:
> > http://forums.debian.n
Martin Michlmayr (2014-02-25):
> * Cyril Brulebois [2014-02-25 17:38]:
> > so if it's about configuring dpkg through dpkg.cfg.d, base-installer
> > looks like the place to implement this. What do you think?
>
> Sounds reasonable.
OK.
> Unfortunately, I don't have a specific need for this featu
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 05:10:42PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 16:18 +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > Ben Hutchings (2011-05-16):
> > > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 17:17 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > Package: base-installer
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > >
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debian-installer
Bug #740073 [network installer (netinst)] Message with no Package: tag cannot
be processed! (Installation report)
Warning: Unknown package 'network'
Warning: Unknown package 'installer'
Warning: Unknown package 'netinst'
Bug reassigned f
* Cyril Brulebois [2014-02-25 17:38]:
> so if it's about configuring dpkg through dpkg.cfg.d, base-installer
> looks like the place to implement this. What do you think?
Sounds reasonable.
Unfortunately, I don't have a specific need for this feature at the
moment or time to implement anything.
Control: reassign -1 debian-installer
Control: retitle -1 netinst hangs on scanning CD-ROM
On Ma, 25 feb 14, 15:10:34, Siarhei Akhramenia wrote:
> Package: network installer (netinst)
>
> Boot method: debian testing netinst
> Image version:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 16:18 +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Ben Hutchings (2011-05-16):
> > On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 17:17 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > Package: base-installer
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Now that the various bootloaders have hooks to handle kernel
> > > inst
Cyril Brulebois (2014-02-13):
> [ TL;DR: d-i FTBFS on sparc, what do we do now? ]
>
> @Kurt: did anything change on the buildd setup side? Both lebrun and spontini
> got that FTBFS, while that wasn't the case before:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=debian-installer&arch=sparc
P
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:08:07 +
Source: grub-installer
Binary: grub-installer
Architecture: amd64 source
Version: 1.92
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Dimitri Joh
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:35:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#666974: fixed in grub-installer 1.92
has caused the Debian Bug report #666974,
regarding installs to /dev/sda when grub-installer/bootdev = /dev/sdb
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Hi Martin,
Martin Michlmayr (2010-06-19):
> Package: base-installer
> Version: 1.107
> Severity: wishlist
>
> dpkg in git has support for filtering files, i.e. a mechanism by which
> you can exclude certain files from being installed (e.g.
> /usr/share/doc, man pages). This is useful on embedde
Jérémy Bobbio (2008-08-24):
> Now that dpkg supports triggers, base-installer should install the kernel
> and extra packages at the same time.
>
> As triggers are used by initramfs-tools, this would allow us to only
> build the initrd once, avoiding multiple expensive computations on RAID
> insta
grub-installer_1.92_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.92.dsc
grub-installer_1.92.tar.gz
grub-installer_1.92_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Andreas Beckmann (2008-02-11):
> please add support for a configurable and preseedable do_symlinks
> setting in kernel-img.conf. I'd like to turn this off because I don't
> need these links. They are not used if they are in / and if I enable
> link_in_boot I get two superfluous grub entries.
I su
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:24:22 +0300
with message-id <20140225142422.ga6...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#244435: hooks
has caused the Debian Bug report #244435,
regarding Needs hooks to install (sub-)arch dependent packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
* Cyril Brulebois [2014-02-25 16:54]:
> > Well, you *can* just do it with apt-install, although it's a bit
> > heavyweight ... it does indicate that the hooks don't necessarily have
> > to be in base-installer though, since it already has that one big
> > generic hook for installing packages. Perh
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 17:01 +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr (2004-05-19):
> > Package: base-installer
> > Version: 0.081
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > base-installer should install nwutil on arm/netwinder.
>
> I think it is no longer needed since:
> | commit 7ae62e3d23d7b191ae4
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:12:12 -0500
with message-id <20140225141212.gt12...@jirafa.cyrius.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#249757: should install nwutil on arm/netwinder
has caused the Debian Bug report #249757,
regarding should install nwutil on arm/netwinder
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:14:52 +0300
with message-id <20140225141452.ga5...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#379205: base-installer: more explicit support for xen
and vserver kernels
has caused the Debian Bug report #379205,
regarding base-installer: more explicit support for xen a
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 13:37 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois writes ("Re: Bug#602506: HP DL165 boot crash with lenny i386
> 686 but OK with -bigmem or amd64"):
> > Either way, kernel selection was adjusted over the last release cycles,
> > especially after kernel flavours were reduced t
Package: netcfg
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
Much like netcfg/get_hostname, a manually preseeded netcfg/get_domain is
overridden by DHCP.
This is similar to #544513.
For the hostname a second debconf key is available to force the hostname to
that value, but for domain this val
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:11:26 +0300
with message-id <20140225141126.ga4...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#365682: INSTALL REPORT
has caused the Debian Bug report #365682,
regarding Should offer the option to load a custom kernel from removable devices
to be marked as done.
This
Robert Millan (2014-02-25):
> Must be fine then. What's the purpose of this conversation?
I was trying to make sure implementing a Depends: nullfs-modules in
base-installer (#650437) couldn't work, so as to:
1. close it;
2. call the current implementation (through pkglist) no longer a kludge
On 25/02/2014 13:33, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Robert Millan (2014-02-25):
>> On 25/02/2014 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> Well, another issue is that depending on nullfs-modules won't fly since
>>> there can be several packages in the archive at the same time that
>>> provide it, due to the dif
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:04:08 +0300
with message-id <20140225140408.ga4...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#255104: why is this bug assigned to rootskel?
has caused the Debian Bug report #255104,
regarding kernel: install symlinks into /boot, not /, please!
to be marked as done.
T
Martin Michlmayr (2004-05-19):
> Package: base-installer
> Version: 0.081
> Severity: wishlist
>
> base-installer should install nwutil on arm/netwinder.
I think it is no longer needed since:
| commit 7ae62e3d23d7b191ae48da5b3569e2996e13f754
| Author: Martin Michlmayr
| Date: Mon Feb 16 13:23
Colin Watson (2004-07-08):
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 02:23:03PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > As discussed, we need hooks to easily install packages only on one
> > (sub-)arch.
>
> Well, you *can* just do it with apt-install, although it's a bit
> heavyweight ... it does indicate that the ho
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:47:53 +0300
with message-id <20140225134753.ga1...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#243437: sometimes doesn't update progress bar after
pick_kernel for install_kernel
has caused the Debian Bug report #243437,
regarding sometimes doesn't update progress bar
Cyril Brulebois writes ("Re: Bug#602506: HP DL165 boot crash with lenny i386
686 but OK with -bigmem or amd64"):
> Either way, kernel selection was adjusted over the last release cycles,
> especially after kernel flavours were reduced to a bare minimum. I doubt
> this bug is still current, so clos
Robert Millan (2014-02-25):
> On 25/02/2014 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Well, another issue is that depending on nullfs-modules won't fly since
> > there can be several packages in the archive at the same time that
> > provide it, due to the different major FreeBSD kernel versions. So
> > nu
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:31:04 +0300
with message-id <20140225133104.ga31...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#666766: debian-installer: 00CDMountPoint apt
configuration file has an incorrect syntax
has caused the Debian Bug report #666766,
regarding debian-installer: 00CDMountPoint
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:16:58 +0300
with message-id <20140225131658.ga29...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#602506: HP DL165 boot crash with lenny i386 686 but OK
with -bigmem or amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #602506,
regarding HP DL165 boot crash with lenny i386 686 but
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings (2011-05-16):
> On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 17:17 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Package: base-installer
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Now that the various bootloaders have hooks to handle kernel
> > installation, or otherwise automatically handle all kernels via their
> > actual
Colin Watson (2009-06-19):
> The installer should have warned you about the fact that installing over
> an unclean (unformatted) target is likely to break, and this is one of
> the ways in which it will break. Maybe it needs to warn harder, or
> attempt to clear out dpkg's configuration or somethi
On 25/02/2014 12:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Robert Millan (2011-11-30):
>> 2011/11/29 Joey Hess :
>>> However, AFAICS, udpkg does not understand kfreebsd-any limited
>>> dependencies, and I doubt anna does either. Did you test the patch?
>>
>> Architecture-specific dependencies are processed by
Robert Millan (2011-11-30):
> 2011/11/29 Joey Hess :
> > However, AFAICS, udpkg does not understand kfreebsd-any limited
> > dependencies, and I doubt anna does either. Did you test the patch?
>
> Architecture-specific dependencies are processed by normal dpkg-dev at
> build time, the resulting p
Your message dated Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:43:31 +0300
with message-id <20140225124331.ga25...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#562427: cryptsetup: Cannot enter luks pass phrase with
USB keyboard during boot
has caused the Debian Bug report #562427,
regarding please rephrase the installer question a
Paul Wise (2014-02-25):
> ---
> debian/bootstrap-base.postinst | 6 ++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst b/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
> index 5beaf01..ed2e0ab 100755
> --- a/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
> +++ b/debian/bootstrap-base.posti
---
debian/bootstrap-base.postinst | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst b/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
index 5beaf01..ed2e0ab 100755
--- a/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
+++ b/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ if [ ! -e
/usr/sh
Paul Wise (2014-02-25):
> ---
> debian/bootstrap-base.postinst | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst b/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
> index 5beaf01..13950e7 100755
> --- a/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
> +++ b/debian/bootstrap-base.postin
Cyril Brulebois (2014-02-25):
> Cyril Brulebois (2014-02-25):
> > It doesn't seem to happen when building against unstable, but it
> > would be nice to make sure we spot the reason/bugfix and possibly
> > speed up its propagation to testing.
>
> I forgot to mention it's netboot/gtk/mini.iso on a
The reported bug happens with all testing amd64 netinst images previous
to Feb 21. They were ISOs that worked perfectly, and simply stopped
working on Wednesday, February 19.
All testing netinst amd64 ISOs launched from February 22, stop at 11% of
the installation, between read the CD and the
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 11:52 +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hmm, I guess this doesn't hurt; but from what I can see,
> bootstrap-base.postinst calls that function after having installed the
> base system, and dpkg ships this directory.
I only noticed that after I sent the patch, sorry. While tryi
---
debian/bootstrap-base.postinst | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst b/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
index 5beaf01..13950e7 100755
--- a/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
+++ b/debian/bootstrap-base.postinst
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ if [ ! -e
/usr/sha
Cyril Brulebois (2014-02-25):
> I'm not sure what's happening here, but building today a d-i image
> against testing results in several segfaults (notably when trying
> to install libc6-udeb, segfault in busybox sh), along with the
> impossibility to start a console by pressing Enter (segfault in
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
I'm not sure what's happening here, but building today a d-i image
against testing results in several segfaults (notably when trying
to install libc6-udeb, segfault in busybox sh), along with the
impossibility to start a console by pressing Enter (segf
st (2014-02-25):
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >> The problem seems to be that partman-lvm created PVs with only
> >>195584 units-used-by-pvck allocated for metadata. However, there
> >>is no way to create PVs with less than 1047552 units-used-by-pvck
> >>with the standard pvcreate.
> >
> >Not tru
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 09:10:38AM +0300, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Did you see my follow-up mail[1]? It looks to me it does not only trigger
> the espeakup hang, but a whole bunch of other hangs.
I did, but without data I didn't have time to trawl through looking for
them. I'm not asserting that
Paul Wise (2014-02-25):
> ---
> library.sh | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/library.sh b/library.sh
> index e40b51c..a89d7db 100644
> --- a/library.sh
> +++ b/library.sh
> @@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ Acquire::https::Verify-Peer "false";
> EOT
> fi
>
> + [ ! -d "$DP
---
library.sh | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/library.sh b/library.sh
index e40b51c..a89d7db 100644
--- a/library.sh
+++ b/library.sh
@@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ Acquire::https::Verify-Peer "false";
EOT
fi
+ [ ! -d "$DPKG_CONFDIR" ] && mkdir -p "$DPKG_CONFDIR"
+
61 matches
Mail list logo
