On 06/03/2014 15:49, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 22/02/14 15:22, Robert Millan wrote:
>> > How about moving /usr and /var to tmpfs then? See attachment.
> This is not quite ideal; if you copy /usr and /var from the initrd to
> dynamically-sized ramdisks, you end up with two copies of the initia
On 06/03/2014 15:37, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> That turned out to be isc-dhcp bug #677985, fixed in jessie/sid, only
> affecting wheezy now.
So FreeBSD 10 userland is good to go then? Is there anything left?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Hello KiBi,
thanks for your message. My mistake to look at the downloaded files instead
of
the timestamp of the server. Sorry. Yes I mean the ones from 2014-03-03
taken
from the links you posted.
If there is something I can do to make the debugging easier then please let
me
know.
Greetings,
Pat
Hi Patrick,
just to confirm, those URL?
Patrick Frank (2014-03-06):
> the above mentioned problem is tested with:
> - debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
> - debian-testing-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso
http://cd
Package: debian-installer
Version:
Severity: normal
Debian Release: jessie/sid
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Dear Maintainers,
the above mentioned problem is tested with:
- debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
- debian-testing-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso
both from 5th of march 2014.
I used these as disk imag
View this message in a browser.
http://archives.subscribermail.com/msg/e06249d1cc5c4fa4a8bceb6f30de375e.htm
To view this message in a browser. Copy and Paste the following URL in your web
address bar: http://www.spacecoastharley.com/default.asp?page=e-blast
On 22/02/14 15:22, Robert Millan wrote:
> How about moving /usr and /var to tmpfs then? See attachment.
This is not quite ideal; if you copy /usr and /var from the initrd to
dynamically-sized ramdisks, you end up with two copies of the initial
contents in memory. That slightly raises the minimum
Steven Chamberlain (2014-03-06):
> On 06/03/14 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Staying at kfreebsd 9 for the jessie alpha 1 images looks like a nice
> > idea
>
> I think that would be nice; having pre-built d-i images with kfreebsd-8
> was very handy when introducing kfreebsd-9 for wheezy. Bu
On 06/03/14 15:27, Robert Millan wrote:
>> > * if the netmask from the DHCP lease is properly set [I suspect I was
>> > seeing an issue in ifupdown however]
> Sorry, didn't check this one.
That turned out to be isc-dhcp bug #677985, fixed in jessie/sid, only
affecting wheezy now.
Regards,
--
Ste
On 06/03/2014 15:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Current blockers:
> linux (ftbfs already uploaded, needs builds + aging).
> ufsutils
There's also the mfsroot size problem on kfreebsd-i386 (I sent a patch but
couldn't
find time to test it, I'm afraid...)
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 06/03/2014 15:22, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> the ioctl warnings in partman
Just FYI, I once traced those to freebsd.c in libparted. It's trivial to remove
the warning, but I'm not sure if that could (maybe!) be hiding legit errors.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-
On 06/03/2014 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Looking at 05_wipe_otherfs.patch in both versions, it looks like v9
> could easily be fixed in the same way? If so, why not do that?
Fine with me, though I got no time to take care of 9.x branch. I barely
keep up with 10.0-related work...
> Staying at
On 06/03/2014 15:05, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 06/03/14 15:01, Robert Millan wrote:
>> I'm still waiting for feedback before uploading FreeBSD 10 userland to sid.
>>
>> If I don't receive any I could still upload it, but Steven said he wanted to
>> test some things first. I'd prefer if he has
On 06/03/14 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Staying at kfreebsd 9 for the jessie alpha 1 images looks like a nice
> idea
I think that would be nice; having pre-built d-i images with kfreebsd-8
was very handy when introducing kfreebsd-9 for wheezy. But when is
alpha1 scheduled to happen?
We shou
Robert Millan (2014-03-06):
> That's #737580, which is fixed in 10.0-2 (experimental).
Looking at 05_wipe_otherfs.patch in both versions, it looks like v9
could easily be fixed in the same way? If so, why not do that?
Staying at kfreebsd 9 for the jessie alpha 1 images looks like a nice
idea (ev
On 06/03/14 15:01, Robert Millan wrote:
> I'm still waiting for feedback before uploading FreeBSD 10 userland to sid.
>
> If I don't receive any I could still upload it, but Steven said he wanted to
> test some things first. I'd prefer if he has a chance to do it.
I've been really unproductive re
On 06/03/2014 11:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Jan Henke (2014-03-06):
>> tty4 gives 3 probably related lines:
>>
>> * update-dev: warning unable to find udevadm; skipping
>> * partman: mkfs.ufs: DIOCGMEDIASIZE:
>> * partman: Inappropiate ioctl for device
>
> Thanks. Hopefully BSD folks will handl
Jan Henke (2014-03-06):
> tty4 gives 3 probably related lines:
>
> * update-dev: warning unable to find udevadm; skipping
> * partman: mkfs.ufs: DIOCGMEDIASIZE:
> * partman: Inappropiate ioctl for device
Thanks. Hopefully BSD folks will handle that.
> Extracting the log files seems a bit tricky
Am 06.03.2014 10:53, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Jan Henke (2014-03-06):
>> Package: debian-installer
>> Version: 20140208
>> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
>>
>> Using the weekly build kfreebsd-amd64 XFCE ISO, it is impossible to
>> install the current Testing distribution. I tried it b
Jan Henke (2014-03-06):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20140208
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
> Using the weekly build kfreebsd-amd64 XFCE ISO, it is impossible to
> install the current Testing distribution. I tried it both within
> Virtualbox on a Linux machine and within
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140208
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Using the weekly build kfreebsd-amd64 XFCE ISO, it is impossible to
install the current Testing distribution. I tried it both within
Virtualbox on a Linux machine and within a Hyper-V VM on Windows. The
installer
[Paul Wise]
> The Linux kernel no longer reports this:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/725714
Oh. :(
> I would say that adding components/DEP-11 support to apt metadata is
> a much better way to achieve this than copying parts out of the
> Contents file. It is pretty close to equivalent anyway and i
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> If firmware is needed (kernel reports this to udev)
The Linux kernel no longer reports this:
https://bugs.debian.org/725714
> A natural step would be to provide the apt-file data fragment
> needed to figure out which package to downlo
23 matches
Mail list logo
