While building packages that have pending changes, I noticed the
newly-introduced lintian warning about no machine-readable
debian/copyright file.
Fixing this should be easyas long as one *does* find copyrights in
the files provided by a given package.
For instance:
partman-efi_44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-efi_44_i386.udeb
partman-efi_44.dsc
partman-efi_44.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
partman-efi_44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-efi_44_i386.udeb
partman-efi_44.dsc
partman-efi_44.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org writes:
While building packages that have pending changes, I noticed the
newly-introduced lintian warning about no machine-readable
debian/copyright file.
Fixing this should be easyas long as one *does* find copyrights in
the files provided by a
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 07:51:48 +0200
Source: partman-efi
Binary: partman-efi
Architecture: source i386
Version: 44
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
lowmem_1.42_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
lowmemcheck_1.42_i386.udeb
lowmem_1.42_all.udeb
lowmem_1.42.dsc
lowmem_1.42.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
rootskel_1.109_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
rootskel_1.109_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.109.dsc
rootskel_1.109.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
lowmem_1.42_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lowmemcheck_1.42_i386.udeb
lowmem_1.42_all.udeb
lowmem_1.42.dsc
lowmem_1.42.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
rootskel_1.109_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.109_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.109.dsc
rootskel_1.109.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 08:09:59 +0200
Source: lowmem
Binary: lowmemcheck lowmem
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.42
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 08:20:50 +0200
Source: rootskel
Binary: rootskel
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.109
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
partman-auto_122_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-auto_122_i386.udeb
partman-auto_122.dsc
partman-auto_122.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
partman-auto_122_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_122_i386.udeb
partman-auto_122.dsc
partman-auto_122.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tag 757818 + patch
I've tested both '--yes' and '--wipesignatures n' in d-i now, and both
work. With either, I am able to reinstall a Debian Edu profile
without any problem. :)
I am not quite sure which of these best fit d-i. I notice the Fedora
people went with --yes in anakonda.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 08:29:29 +0200
Source: partman-auto
Binary: partman-auto
Architecture: source i386
Version: 122
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Processing control commands:
tag 757818 + patch
Bug #757818 [partman-lvm] partman-lvm: Refuses to reinstall if it find old lvm
volume
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #757818 to the same tags previously set
--
754517: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754517
757818:
Processing control commands:
tag 757818 + patch
Bug #757818 [partman-lvm] partman-lvm: Refuses to reinstall if it find old lvm
volume
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #757818 to the same tags previously set
--
750212: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750212
757818:
Processing control commands:
tag 757818 + patch
Bug #757818 [partman-lvm] partman-lvm: Refuses to reinstall if it find old lvm
volume
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #757818 to the same tags previously set
--
757818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757818
Debian Bug
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2014-09-07):
While building packages that have pending changes, I noticed the
newly-introduced lintian warning about no machine-readable
debian/copyright file.
Ignoring non-problems looks like a good idea.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 10:35:25AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2014-09-07):
While building packages that have pending changes, I noticed the
newly-introduced lintian warning about no machine-readable
debian/copyright file.
Ignoring non-problems looks
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org (2014-09-07):
During Debconf14, I could chat with Joey about the future of Tasksel,
and having a More option task, which would lead to a new screen which
would propose more tasks.
Before anyone can implement this plan, we have to make sure that we all
agree on
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2014-09-07):
While building packages that have pending changes, I noticed the
newly-introduced lintian warning about no machine-readable
debian/copyright file.
Ignoring non-problems looks like a good idea.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 739824 + pending
Bug #739824 [partman-efi] partman-efi: The term EFI boot partition is
non-standard and adds to community confusion
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Joey Hess, le Sat 06 Sep 2014 12:44:29 -0400, a écrit :
When I select Enable assitive technologies in
xfce4-accessability-settings, it claims that it will start the required
applications for screen readers and magnifiers. But if it does, I can't
tell.
It doesn't.
First, due to a bug in
Hi,
El Sábado 6 Septiembre 2014 21:29 CEST, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org Ha escrito:
Some things that seem to be missing from the cinnamon
task that are included in other desktop tasks:
* package management (eg synaptic)
I'm not a fan of synaptic, but I've added it to
Dear All:
First, thanks for keeping debian the best darned os there is.
Second, I've some artwork I'd be happy to package up as a theme for
jessie, with an eye towards two objectives: Testing 10ft UI,
generally, learning to be a best-practces upstream for debian,
specifically.
I also publish a
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Fixing this should be easyas long as one *does* find copyrights in
the files provided by a given package.
For instance:
bubulle@sesostris:~/src/debian/debian-installer/trunk/packages/partman-efi(master)
$ licensecheck -r --copyright *
Is it OK for me to commit this patch to git? Are the lvm tools needed
in /target/ before finish.d is executed?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (2014-09-07):
Is it OK for me to commit this patch to git? Are the lvm tools needed
in /target/ before finish.d is executed?
Well, it looks to me that figuring that out is a prerequisite to pushing
the patch…
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 07 Sep 2014 15:03:09 +0200, a écrit :
After that bug is fixed, xfce4-session indeed starts at-spi-bus-launcher
and at-spi2-registryd, but that's only the server part of the
accessibility stack. orca also needs to have been installed (currently
it is not), and be
Your message dated Sun, 07 Sep 2014 18:00:24 +
with message-id e1xqgle-0006lq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#712696: fixed in tasksel 3.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #712696,
regarding debian-installer: Add Cinnamon and Mate as alternative DEs.
to be marked as done.
This
Hi folks,
I'm wondering whether it would make sense to ask ow...@bugs.debian.org
for a d-i.debian.org pseudo package which could be used to track
bugs/proposed changes for d-i's infrastructure. This includes but is not
limited to: the various scripts generating reports on d-i.debian.org,
scripts
Your message dated Sun, 7 Sep 2014 20:37:32 +0200
with message-id 20140907183732.gf14...@ulrik.uio.no
and subject line Re: Bug#680542: partman-lvm: Should call apt-install in
finish.d
has caused the Debian Bug report #680542,
regarding partman-lvm: Should call apt-install in finish.d
to be marked
Yves-Alexis Perez, le Sun 07 Sep 2014 21:06:43 +0200, a écrit :
ATM, with a fresh XFCE installation, enabling Enable assitive
technologies does not actually start the orca screen reader, because
the screen reader does not get installed along the XFCE installation.
XFCE should thus depend
On dim., 2014-09-07 at 21:13 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Well, for a blind user, it *is*!...
Sure, but not everyone's blind. I sympathise with a11y, but forcing
gnome-orca on everyone won't happen.
Anyhow, what do you propose to fix the accessibility of XFCE? Adding
the
dependency to
Yves-Alexis Perez, le Sun 07 Sep 2014 21:15:19 +0200, a écrit :
On dim., 2014-09-07 at 21:13 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Well, for a blind user, it *is*!...
Sure, but not everyone's blind.
And not everyone speaks all languages on earth, yet we install all
language files by default, which
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On dim., 2014-09-07 at 21:53 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez, le Sun 07 Sep 2014 21:15:19 +0200, a écrit :
On dim., 2014-09-07 at 21:13 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Well, for a blind user, it *is*!...
Sure, but not everyone's blind.
And not
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 07 Sep 2014 20:14:20 +0200, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 07 Sep 2014 15:03:09 +0200, a écrit :
After that bug is fixed, xfce4-session indeed starts at-spi-bus-launcher
and at-spi2-registryd, but that's only the server part of the
accessibility stack. orca also
Control: reassign -1 task-xfce-desktop
Control: tags -1 - wontfix
Yves-Alexis Perez, le Sun 07 Sep 2014 22:23:34 +0200, a écrit :
On dim., 2014-09-07 at 21:53 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Yves-Alexis Perez, le Sun 07 Sep 2014 21:15:19 +0200, a écrit :
On dim., 2014-09-07 at 21:13 +0200,
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 task-xfce-desktop
Bug #760778 [xfce4-session] xfce4-session: Please depend on gnome-orca
Bug reassigned from package 'xfce4-session' to 'task-xfce-desktop'.
No longer marked as found in versions xfce4-session/4.10.1-8.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
I sympathise with a11y, but forcing gnome-orca on everyone won't
happen.
Well, that is actually precisely our goal: to have gnome-orca installed
on all systems, ready to be started in case one needs it.
Then it's unrelated to Xfce, and you want to include that in the base
system.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 760778 task-xfce-desktop: Please depend on gnome-orca
Bug #760778 [task-xfce-desktop] xfce4-session: Please depend on gnome-orca
Changed Bug title to 'task-xfce-desktop: Please depend on gnome-orca' from
'xfce4-session: Please depend on
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Chris Tillman toff.till...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the picture of the Win 8 WLAN properties which I claimed to
have attached originally.
--
Chris Tillman
Developer
--
Chris Tillman
Developer
wlan0-in-windows-conf.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Here is the picture of the Win 8 WLAN properties which I claimed to
have attached originally.
--
Chris Tillman
Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-09-08):
This is (almost) exactly what's being worked on after discussions at
DebConf. By removing some of the less useful tasks, we'll be able to
add some extra more useful options.
At some point it would really be nice to have a summary of what happened
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:33:06AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-09-08):
This is (almost) exactly what's being worked on after discussions at
DebConf. By removing some of the less useful tasks, we'll be able to
add some extra more useful options.
At some
I have made some significant changes to tasksel, that will need changes
elsewhere. I plan to upload this to unstable pretty soon, feedback permitting.
Some of the more popular desktop environments are individually
selectable in tasksel, in a little sub-menu.
(Of course that's displayed
There is going to be a limited amount of space in tasksel for blends,
given current debconf UI constraints.
I think that using popcon as a rough pass to select the blends makes
rather a lot of sense. The Debian Pure Blends effort has been around
for several releases and been publicised. The
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
limit source tasksel
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'tasksel'
Limit currently set to 'source':'tasksel'
tags 604100 + pending
Bug #604100 [tasksel] tasksel: Please readd netatalk to file-server task:
protocol
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
What is the recommended practice in such case?
This package is under the GNU GPL version 2, or any later
version at your option.
Sure. License is always easy to find. Which is why I didn't mention it
in my post. My only problem|question was about
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi folks,
I'm wondering whether it would make sense to ask ow...@bugs.debian.org
for a d-i.debian.org pseudo package which could be used to track
bugs/proposed changes for d-i's infrastructure. This includes but is not
limited to: the various
partman-efi_45_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-efi_45_i386.udeb
partman-efi_45.dsc
partman-efi_45.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
partman-efi_45_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-efi_45_i386.udeb
partman-efi_45.dsc
partman-efi_45.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:52:18 +0200
Source: partman-efi
Binary: partman-efi
Architecture: source i386
Version: 45
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Mon, 08 Sep 2014 05:18:37 +
with message-id e1xqrlz-9g...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#739824: fixed in partman-efi 45
has caused the Debian Bug report #739824,
regarding partman-efi: The term EFI boot partition is non-standard and adds
to community confusion
55 matches
Mail list logo
