Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Dear debian-boot,
When I TFTP-boot my Linkstation Pro using a Jessie D-I image, it appears
to boot, but it never requests a DHCP address nor responds on the usual
default (for this box) IP of 192.168.11.150. (Does D-I use a different
fallback IP,
Linux kernel ABI bump in unstable: from 3.14-2 to 3.16-1
Full summary: http://d-i.debian.org/kernel-summary.html#unstable
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.
Steven Chamberlain (2014-09-08):
> On 04/09/14 20:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > this package is no longer installable on kfreebsd-* since it depends on
> > ntfs-3g-udeb; this totally breaks d-i on kfreebsd-* since partman-base
> > depends on partman-partitioning, and many other components depend
On 09/09/2014 06:21 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>>
>> It's looking like some of the options are confusing for both advanced
>> users and newbies. The technologies behind the tasks are hidden, and
>> there's no obvious way to know what will happe
Le 08/09/2014 14:30, Michael Biebl a écrit :
I fail to see why a11y would be important enough to force it to Xfce
installations while not beeing important enough to force it to default
installations.
Right, we can probably add it to task-desktop instead. Joey?
I'm not sure if this is the right
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> I have made some significant changes to tasksel, that will need changes
> elsewhere. I plan to upload this to unstable pretty soon, feedback permitting.
[...]
>│[*] Desktop environment │
>│
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 760169 + pending
Bug #760169 [src:partman-ufs] partman-ufs: enable soft-updates
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
760169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > - database-server: commonly one would expect MySQL, and postgress gets
> > installed
[Paul Wise]
> Isn't tasksel for people with no expectations? People who know
> something about the technology they are looking for will install the
> r
tags 760169 + pending
thanks
On 01/09/14 15:57, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I propose that, as we discussed last year, we might enable soft-updates
> for newly-created kfreebsd UFS filesystems. partman-ufs is now
> kfreebsd-any so this change wouldn't affect other architectures.
Since a week has
On Sep 09, Paul Wise wrote:
> Isn't tasksel for people with no expectations? People who know
> something about the technology they are looking for will install the
> relevant packages instead of following tasksel recommendations.
Tasksel is not about recommendations: its purpose is to easily inst
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> It's looking like some of the options are confusing for both advanced
> users and newbies. The technologies behind the tasks are hidden, and
> there's no obvious way to know what will happen (other than looking at
> the package source of
On 04/09/14 20:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> this package is no longer installable on kfreebsd-* since it depends on
> ntfs-3g-udeb; this totally breaks d-i on kfreebsd-* since partman-base
> depends on partman-partitioning, and many other components depend on
> partman-base.
I'm a little worried t
Hi,
On 04/09/14 07:39, Axel Stammler wrote:
> PS command showed Parted running. There was no progress for hours and no
> harddisk or CD
> access.
It would be ideal to switch to the syslog console (Alt+F4), and/or drop
to a shell (Alt-F2) to look at the contents of /var/log/partman; even
getting
On 08/09/14 21:35, bruno evangelista wrote:
> It almost completes that operation (up to 83%) when you read
> "Preparing linux - image-3.2.0-4-powerpc64"and right there it always
> crashes. At that point something makes the computer crash.
I'm not familiar with Power Mac G5 / powerpc, but i
On 07/09/14 19:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> tasksel (3.22) unstable; urgency=medium
>* Add task-cinnamon-desktop. Thanks, Margarita Manterola.
> Closes: #712696
Bug #712696 also mentioned the MATE desktop, but AFAICT no task was
added for it yet. If someone wants that to hap
Gentlemans,
I am trying to install Debian 7 (any version) in my Power Mac G5. I am extided
about it.
But it has been frustating after several times my computer crashed while trying
to install it.
I checked the internet information and I believe that the iso file i got was
not good. That is my
Your message dated Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:18:42 +0100
with message-id <1410193122.8217.21.ca...@kazak.uk.xensource.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#760484: PLEASE CLOSE 760484: PXE-based install of
current netboot images for amd64/i386 hangs at libc-bin installation
has caused the Debian Bug report #760
On 22:52, Joey Hess wrote:
>│[*] Desktop environment │
>
>│[*] ... Xfce│
>
>│[ ] ... GNOME │
>
>│[ ]
This problem was not replicated on today's (Mon Sep 8 2014) 32-bit
netboot image, nor did it replicate in today's 64-bit image.
Please close 760484.
Thanks!
Best, -- pete
--
Pete St. Onge
pete.stonge.w...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Opening a new thread, trying to sum-up what's been said.
It's looking like some of the options are confusing for both advanced
users and newbies. The technologies behind the tasks are hidden, and
there's no obvious way to know what will happen (other than looking at
the package source of tasksel
I have a black screen without cursor, when I select any kind of
installation. Text, Graphical, Expert.
Debian 7.6.0 Netinst AMD64
Intel Core i7 4770, GTX 660 Ti, 8 GB RAM, UEFI (Chipset Z97).
Michael Biebl, le Mon 08 Sep 2014 14:30:56 +0200, a écrit :
> >> I fail to see why a11y would be important enough to force it to Xfce
> >> installations while not beeing important enough to force it to default
> >> installations.
> >
> > Right, we can probably add it to task-desktop instead. Joey?
>> I fail to see why a11y would be important enough to force it to Xfce
>> installations while not beeing important enough to force it to default
>> installations.
>
> Right, we can probably add it to task-desktop instead. Joey?
I'm not sure if this is the right approach. Isn't there a risk that
Yves-Alexis Perez, le Mon 08 Sep 2014 10:37:34 +0200, a écrit :
> What I'm against is forcing stuff onto users which have exactly no need
> for it. With that kind of reasoning we would install the complete set of
> packages in every installed system “just in case”.
There is a big difference in the
On dim., 2014-09-07 at 16:28 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> So, I see no problem with adding gnome-orca to task-xfce-desktop, given
> those installation size numbers.
I do.
>
> I sympathize with Yves in wanting to keep the xfce4-* packages
> containing only actual upstream XFCE stuff;
(OT: Yves-Alexi
25 matches
Mail list logo
