On 14/10/14 20:18, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Thanks for the report. We're working on this,
Okay thanks, although I notice you filed a bug only against "gnome":
* Why only gnome? If it is important to have a gtk2 dialog then
shouldn't other desktops have it too?
* Since this bug affects tasksel,
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/,
build date October 6th
Date:
Machine: Lenovo Thinkpad G50
Partitions:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E]
Quoting Bas Wijnen (2014-10-14 19:19:36)
> I have heard about [Blends] for quite a while, indeed, but I must say
> that I never entirely understood what they are. I'm guessing I'm not
> alone in this. So let me write what I think they are, and then you
> can correct me. I've read the explanat
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:20:02AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I admit I expected *you* to know about Blends for a while - but
> considering the video recorded quote I think I was not wrong using this
> chance to point this out for other readers of this mail as it is really
> a fact that I always
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 17:07 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Here is another draft, this time also providing the module name. I
> dropped the code looking in /proc/modules, as three ways to find
> firmware seem a bit too much. I added similar code to the
> isenkram-cli package to install neede
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:24:45PM +0200, Hermann Lauer wrote:
> both Jessie beta 1 amd64 images (20140316 and 20140802) suffer from this.
fixed with Jessie beta 2 netboot here. And serial console works with:
append initrd=debian-installer/amd64/initrd.gz auto priority=critical
url=http://<...>p
Here is another draft, this time also providing the module name. I
dropped the code looking in /proc/modules, as three ways to find
firmware seem a bit too much. I added similar code to the
isenkram-cli package to install needed firmware packages into
/target/, and it seem to work well there. :)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 20:08:24 +0100
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Binary: debian-installer-7.0-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-7.0-netboot-armel
debian-installer-7.0-netboot-armhf debian-installer-7.0-netboot-i386
Hi Cyril,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:14:53AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >
> > In other words: I perfectly know the fact that Blends are widely
> > ignored even amongst Debian developers and that's not about you / the
> > debian-boot team - perhaps my "running around and tell people" is just
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 general
Bug #765076 [debootstrap] variant=buildd should not install init systems
Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'general'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #765076 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter f
Hi again Andreas,
Andreas Tille (2014-10-14):
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:02:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > well to be honest the whole blend story came as a surprise.
>
> Ahhh, this in turn is surprising for me since the first "version" of
> this bug is dated 24 Mar 2003 (#186085) :-).
Hi Cyril,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:02:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Tille (2014-10-08):
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 09:11:24PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the second beta
> > > release of the installer f
control: reassign -1 general
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Christian PERRIER (2014-10-13):
> > Just for the record, an attempt to build base-installer this morning
> > failed on my build machine.
> >
> > I didn't send a bug report yet as I have a small doubt this could be
> > caused by a local problem. I'll tr
14 matches
Mail list logo
