Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB stick copied from beta-2 netinst image
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/jessie_di_beta_2/amd64/iso-cd/debian-jessie-DI-b2-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: Oct 14,2014
Machine: DIY PC based on M/B: AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Processor: Pentium G3258
Hi Bas,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:49:32PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
For the moment the way to install Blends is to use the plain Debian
installer and afterwards install a bunch of metapackages.
Ah, and that's what you want to change now. That sounds like a very
good idea.
:-)
The
Hi,
David Kalnischkies da...@kalnischkies.de (2014-10-15):
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:47:44AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[ X-D-Cc: debian-boot@, please keep it in the loop when replying. ]
[Done, although I don't see the header… (bad mutt, bad).]
IIRC it's munged when the submitted
Quoting Andreas Tille (2014-10-16 08:47:19)
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:49:32PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On occasion, I've needed a single-use system; something that boots up
into an application and that shuts down when that application exits.
(Having the full power of Debian in the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
close 765082
Bug #765082 [debian-installer] Unable to install boot loader on APM Mustang
Marked Bug as done
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
765082:
Hello Folks,
I wonder if someone here might be able to provide some guidance.
Apropos all of the discussion of systemd vs. sysvinit vs. other init
systems - the question has come up about whether the installer might
present a choice of init systems, or in the alternative, how one might
Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net (2014-10-16):
1. Where in the installer code does the init system get installed
into the target build?
As far as I can tell, from somewhat out-of-date documentation
(http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/internals/ - last updated 2010):
- the
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.5-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Hi,
during a test of DI-B2 on an embedded device, at the partitioning stage,
selecting
1) Guided - use entire disk mode, and then
2) Separate var,tmp,home partitions
failed with an error when
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net (2014-10-16):
1. Where in the installer code does the init system get installed
into the target build?
As far as I can tell, from somewhat out-of-date documentation
(http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/internals/ - last updated
Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net (2014-10-16):
Do you mean preseed/early_command? And if so, how early do those
get run (i.e., can you run that before base-install).
No.
If yes - that does raise a couple of additional questions:
- it sure looks like one would have to install an
Control: retitle -1 (re)implement missing firmware support through kernel log
grepping
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (2014-10-15):
I've tested the patch just now, and it seem to be working as it
should
It appears loading firmware seems to work but I can't
Control: block -1 by 765458
Paul p...@spookygypsy.com (2014-10-16):
Comments/Problems: No installable kernel was found in the defined apt
sources (only source listed was the cd-rom)
couldn't find a way to add sources during install, couldn't get to that step
of install
after i exited and
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:47:19AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Would this use case also be a reason for creating a personal blend? Or
even an official one?
Jonas has answered this question. I'd like to add that I'm no fan of
personal things since you spoil the idea of forming a
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: 8GB usb formatted w/mbr scheme amd fs f16, loaded by usb image
writer in Mint
Image version:
cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso
Date: 10/16/2014 5am-ish
Machine: asus h97m plus
Processor: 4th gen i5
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 (re)implement missing firmware support through kernel log
grepping
Bug #725714 [hw-detect] installation-reports: Recent netinst.iso doesn't write
missing firmware to /run/udev/firmware-missing
Bug #736965 [hw-detect] Network detection fails in
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Hi
Please unblock the udeb producing package wpa and reduce its
propagation time to 5 days. wpa 2.3-1 has been successfully built and
uploaded
Processing control commands:
block -1 by 765458
Bug #765628 [installation-reports] Package: installation-reports
765628 was not blocked by any bugs.
765628 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 765628: 765458
--
765628: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765628
Hallo Stefan!
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann s@gmx.de (2014-10-16):
Please unblock the udeb producing package wpa and reduce its
propagation time to 5 days. wpa 2.3-1 has been successfully built and
uploaded on all release architectures.
Looking at its changelog and the current d-i schedule (or
Since I asked the question, I figure I should follow up with what I
found out
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net (2014-10-16):
1. Where in the installer code does the init system get installed
into the target build?
As far as I can tell, from somewhat
partman-zfs_40_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-zfs_40.dsc
partman-zfs_40.tar.xz
partman-zfs_40_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
partman-zfs_40_kfreebsd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-zfs_40.dsc
partman-zfs_40.tar.xz
partman-zfs_40_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:28:50 +0200
Source: partman-zfs
Binary: partman-zfs
Architecture: source kfreebsd-i386
Version: 40
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Hi Bas,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:27:37PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Ok. Is it supposed to be possible to install more than one blend
simultaneously? Is that technically prevented with Conflicts?
Not at all. I have not tested but I would bet that you can install all
existing metapackages of
hw-detect_1.105_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hw-detect_1.105.dsc
hw-detect_1.105.tar.xz
hw-detect_1.105_i386.udeb
ethdetect_1.105_all.udeb
disk-detect_1.105_all.udeb
driver-injection-disk-detect_1.105_all.udeb
archdetect_1.105_i386.udeb
hw-detect_1.105_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
hw-detect_1.105.dsc
hw-detect_1.105.tar.xz
hw-detect_1.105_i386.udeb
ethdetect_1.105_all.udeb
disk-detect_1.105_all.udeb
driver-injection-disk-detect_1.105_all.udeb
partman-base_179_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_179.dsc
partman-base_179.tar.xz
partman-base_179_i386.udeb
partman-utils_179_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
partman-base_179_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-base_179.dsc
partman-base_179.tar.xz
partman-base_179_i386.udeb
partman-utils_179_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
--
To
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:43:52 +0200
Source: hw-detect
Binary: hw-detect ethdetect disk-detect driver-injection-disk-detect archdetect
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.105
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Your message dated Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:38:01 +
with message-id e1xeskd-0006qq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#725714: fixed in hw-detect 1.105
has caused the Debian Bug report #725714,
regarding (re)implement missing firmware support through kernel log grepping
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:38:01 +
with message-id e1xeskd-0006qq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#725714: fixed in hw-detect 1.105
has caused the Debian Bug report #725714,
regarding (re)implement missing firmware support through kernel log grepping
to be marked as done.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:21:20 +0200
Source: partman-base
Binary: partman-base partman-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 179
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Hi,
I am trying to install Jessie from CDROM (downloaded last night 16/10/2014)
and got the same problem.
However, after the apt setup step, I went to a command prompt, chrooted
/target and ran apt-get install linux-image-amd64 manually, which seemed
to work.
I continued with the installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I made a patch to see each Depends:/Pre-Depends: and
respect exclude parameter.
If init Pre-Depends: systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart,
exclude=none gets systemd-sysv.
exclude=systemd-sysv gets sysvinit-core.
At 16 Oct 14 19:36:54 GMT,
Miles Fidelman wrote:
(snip)
base-installer/includes
and/or
base-installer/excludes
So, in theory, it looks like there IS a way to preseed things during the
early install process - but
- bug #668001 in debootstrap (open since 2012) seems to get in the way
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-10-16):
I'm not sure why changelog and comments mention kernel + udev. AFAICT
that's a feature that got dropped on the udev side only, so mentioning
only userland (udev) would probably be more precise/correct.
I really meant to make sure we got this right
Kenshi Muto km...@debian.org (2014-10-17):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I made a patch to see each Depends:/Pre-Depends: and
respect exclude parameter.
If init Pre-Depends: systemd-sysv | sysvinit-core | upstart,
exclude=none gets systemd-sysv.
At Fri, 17 Oct 2014 05:57:30 +0200,
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Kenshi Muto km...@debian.org (2014-10-17):
Thanks for the patch but…
I'm really uncomfortable adding that kind of patch this late in the
release cycle, especially since the “I don't want systemd” “problem”
is trivially solved with a
37 matches
Mail list logo
