On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 03:04:38PM +0100, Peter Valdemar Mørch wrote:
This occurs in in our work environment in VMware Workstation and
Proxmox when using bridged eth0, but not when using NAT. In my home
network, the exact same procedure goes through without any hangs for
both bridged and NAT.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
But please tell me: Why is there no Router Advertisement in the packet
dump? I see Router Solicitations and DHCPv6 interactions, but no RA.
I have absolutely no idea. Perhaps that is the reason for the hang?
All I know is
Hi,
the last d-i daily build on ppc64el seems to have happened on Dec 12.
Can you please have a look and check whether something needs fixing
there?
Thanks for your time.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Control: tag -1 +pending
On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 15:39 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
On Dec 19, 2014, at 16:15, Ian Campbell i...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 13:38 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
I’ve only booted the system by ‘bootz’ without initrd. If I load the raw
initrd image
Processing control commands:
tag -1 +pending
Bug #773255 [flash-kernel] Add TI OMAP5 uEVM board support db
Added tag(s) pending.
--
773255: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773255
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 773274 20141216-00:08
Bug #773274 [installation-reports] installation-reports: parted_server segfault
There is no source info for the package 'installation-reports' at version
'20141216-00:08' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 01:32:12PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
the last d-i daily build on ppc64el seems to have happened on Dec 12.
Can you please have a look and check whether something needs fixing
there?
The old build daemon has been replaced by a DSAed machine running Jessie.
On Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The old build daemon has been replaced by a DSAed machine running Jessie.
This new setup doesn't allow setting-up d-i builds there.
uhm, why? is DSA aware of this?
ppc64el must have d-i builds, else it will either delay jessie or not be
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 02:29:00PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The old build daemon has been replaced by a DSAed machine running Jessie.
This new setup doesn't allow setting-up d-i builds there.
uhm, why? is DSA aware of this?
Yes. It's
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 02:38:01PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 02:29:00PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The old build daemon has been replaced by a DSAed machine running Jessie.
This new setup doesn't allow
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.49
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: USB stick
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.1.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-7.1.0-amd64-netinst.iso
(or 7.0, or similar)
Date: Aug 20, 2013
Machine: Dell Inspiron
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (2014-12-22):
ppc64el must have d-i builds, else it will either delay jessie or not be
released with jessie.
Huh?!
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: install from net using i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 netinst.iso;
debian-jessie-DI-b2-kfreebsd-amd64-netinst.iso
Image version: i386: vmlinuz-3.16-2-686-pae, kfreebsd-amd64:
kfreebsd-10.0-1-amd64.gz
Date: circa December 15, 2014
Machine: Mac Pro model 1,1,
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 08:24:08PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:49:59AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 09:45 +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
one option that doesn't seem to have been considered would be to create
a separate package (let's call it UEFIx)
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:24:23 +0100 Baptiste Jammet bapti...@mailoo.org wrote:
Hi,
As already said, this was fixed with commits r69410-69412.
I can close this
bug in few days, unless someone do it before or tell me to not do it.
No news, so I'm closing it now.
Any idea when the release
rootskel-gtk_1.31_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel-gtk_1.31.dsc
rootskel-gtk_1.31.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:48:18 +0100
Source: rootskel-gtk
Binary: rootskel-gtk
Architecture: source
Version: 1.31
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Package: task-mate-desktop
Version: 3.29
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I installed Debian Jessie 64bits. I choosed Desktop environment and MATE.
* What exactly did you do
Hello,
Wearing my automatic D-I upload machine hat, I am about to upload
flash-kernel with Ian's last changes:
Support for TI OMAP5 uEVM board (Patch from Chen Baozi, Closes:
#773255)
From the git log, these changes seems fairly safe. However, given the
current release policy, I prefer asking
19 matches
Mail list logo
