Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
No errors during the installation process, but 2 problems:
- about every 2nd time freeze at boot
- audio not working
[ 31.283772] ioremap error for 0x7bbc9000-0x7bbca000, requested 0x2, got
0x0
[ 31.283952] esrt:
On 12.09.2016 18:10, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Sounds like a strong argument against enabling it by default on VGA
> consoles. I'm totally fine with that. :-)
Yeah I'm also fine with that. Sorry for not replying earlier. As long as
you have a way to multiplex differently like with VTs or some other
Axel Beckert, on Mon 12 Sep 2016 18:10:38 +0200, wrote:
> > invoking screen is in script:
> > -
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/rootskel.git/tree/src/sbin/debian-installer
> >
> > It uses system's $TERM, if bterm fails in screen, maybe it's a bug of
> > screen?
>
> As I am not sure
Hi,
Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> > Another argument against screen-udeb by default on normal VGA console:
> > it seems to be preventing bterm from running, and thus disables a lot of
> > languages which need it. I
Hello,
Roger Shimizu, on Tue 13 Sep 2016 00:35:45 +0900, wrote:
> invoking screen is in script:
> -
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/rootskel.git/tree/src/sbin/debian-installer
>
> It uses system's $TERM, if bterm fails in screen, maybe it's a bug of screen?
Err, it's not really a bug:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Another argument against screen-udeb by default on normal VGA console:
> it seems to be preventing bterm from running, and thus disables a lot of
> languages which need it. I haven't really followed what
Seu cliente de e-mail não pode ler este e-mail.
Para visualizá-lo on-line, por favor, clique aqui:
http://vp.e-suprimax.com.br/e/1839084/327-45-174
Para parar de receber nossos
Emails:http://vp.e-suprimax.com.br/d/1839084/45-327
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:36:21PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> CCing Clint Adams (fakeroot maintainer) in the hope that he might
> be able to provide some further insight.
I don't have access to my ARM devices this week but if I did I would
try what's described in the gdb section of
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this
Hi!
It's been a while... what do you think of my patch? :-)
--
Jon Boden
ubuntuBSD -- The power of FreeBSD kernel with familiarity of Ubuntu OS!
http://www.ubuntubsd.org/ -- https://twitter.com/ubuntuBSD
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 14:07:04 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Package: debootstrap
> Version: 1.0.81
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> in Debian, every binary package implicitly depends on all binary
> packages marked as Essential:yes and every source package implicitly
> build-depends on the
Your message dated Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:47:10 +0200
with message-id <87fup51uoh@deep-thought.43-1.org>
and subject line Re: debootstrap: Add support for XZ compressed binary packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #634248,
regarding debootstrap: Add support for XZ compressed binary packages
12 matches
Mail list logo