Package: console-setup
Version: 1.152
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i l10n
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I ran "apt-get dist-upgrade" to upgrade to t
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:09:07 +0200
Source: debian-installer
Binary: debian-installer
Architecture: source
Version: 20161027
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Cyril
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 742671 + pending
Bug #742671 [base-installer] seeding base-installer/debootstrap_script with an
absolute path emits a warning, and just a codename results in an error
Added tag(s) pending.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
debian-installer_20161027_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20161027.dsc
debian-installer_20161027.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On 27 October 2016 at 12:09, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Yeah this feels fairly straightforward. I just applied the change to git
> and it should be in the next upload. (Currently we're in the middle of a
> release, though.)
Rock on! Please give me a prod if there's anything more I can do to help. :)
tag -1 + pending
thanks
On 10/27/2016 02:03 PM, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> It's been a couple of years, but base-installer and debootstrap are
> still in this odd state where base-installer wants the script to be
> just the distribution and debootstrap wants it to be the full path.
> So, whateve
Hey there!
It's been a couple of years, but base-installer and debootstrap are
still in this odd state where base-installer wants the script to be
just the distribution and debootstrap wants it to be the full path.
So, whatever you put in the preseed you get an error (alas, the
base-installer one
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:53:36PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 05:13 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Currently s390-netdevice in the code supports following networktypes:
> > * qeth
> > * ctc
> > * iucv
> > * virtio
> >
> > virtio is, in fact, a no-op.
>
> Yup.
>
> > iucv refer
On 26.10.2016 22:53, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 05:13 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> Currently s390-netdevice in the code supports following
>> networktypes: * qeth * ctc * iucv * virtio
>>
>> virtio is, in fact, a no-op.
>
> Yup.
>
>> iucv refers to "IUCV network device" which has b
9 matches
Mail list logo