debian-installer-netboot-images_20170127_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-02-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 08:09:04 +0100 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-9-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-9-netboot-arm64 debian-installer-9-netboot-armel debian-installer-9-netboot-armhf

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20170127_source.changes

2017-02-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
debian-installer-netboot-images_20170127_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20170127.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20170127.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20170127_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your

Bug#853921: fonts-android-udeb: broken rendering for Korean glyphs in debian-installer

2017-02-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: fonts-android-udeb Version: 1:6.0.0r26-1 Severity: serious Tags: d-i Justification: breaks d-i for Korean (Please keep both debian-boot@lists.debian.org and myself in copy when replying.) Hi, I've reported this regression for Korean support against debian-installer a few minutes ago:

Bug#853917: debian-installer: missing glyphs for Korean / broken rendering

2017-02-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Source: debian-installer Version: 20160516 Severity: important Tags: l10n (debian-l10n-kor...@lists.debian.org in X-Debbugs-Cc for informational purposes; maybe someone there will find out what happened before someone from the installer team does.) Spotted by victory and mentioned on IRC: we're

Re: d-i manual: 3 "jessie" remain in current guide

2017-02-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, victory, on Mon 30 Jan 2017 21:53:52 +0900, wrote: > no idea if these are still valid also for stretch; > > boot-installer/arm.xml:55- > The graphical installer is not enabled on the arm64 images > for jessie so the serial console is used. > > boot-installer/arm.xml:108- >

Debian Installer Stretch RC 2 release

2017-02-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the second release candidate of the installer for Debian 9 "Stretch". Important change in this release of the installer = * A major update of os-prober was included in this release. This

Re: Do I have to do anything to make sure ext4lazyinit works as being advertised ?

2017-02-01 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 01/02/2017, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 02:27:39PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >>> My patch was fix for bug which was spotted on large disk arrays, >>> 36 in my case. So itable initialization was active all the time >>> while

Bug#853755: installation-reports: ppc64el fails to boot after installation

2017-02-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Erwan Prioul (2017-02-01): > Unfortunately, I don't have a working image. > The issue has appeared since last Saturday, Jan 28th. Could this be due to latest kernel updates? 4.9.6-x were accepted on the 27/28th. You could either use rescue mode or redo an

Re: Do I have to do anything to make sure ext4lazyinit works as being advertised ?

2017-02-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 02:27:39PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > Basically the article's statement is wrong. > There is no such thing as explicit itable initialization IO bandwidth > restriction in MB/s. itable initialization rate is controlled by init_itable=N > see:

Re: Do I have to do anything to make sure ext4lazyinit works as being advertised ?

2017-02-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 04:53:34AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > hmm From what little I understand, it always the slowest interface > that needs to be supported. > > And IIUC , in ext4lazyinit's case it is probably some of the MMC cards > due to which the 16 MB/S transmission is kept -

Bug#853855: di-utils: Kernel boot options containing a dot are not propagated to the installed system

2017-02-01 Thread Emmanuel Kasper
Package: di-utils Version: 1.117 Severity: minor Tags: d-i A kernel boot param like net.ifnames=0 will be skipped when the installer parses the boot option for setting the bootloader. Found in di-utils: # Skip module-specific variables varnodot="${var##*.*}"

Lo que se viene en 2017: No te quedes afuera

2017-02-01 Thread ITSitio Gadgets
No te quedes afuera de lo que se viene en http://fileserver.itsitio.com/descargas/itsitio/ITSitio_100116_HTML_Gadgets.html

partman-nbd_0.43_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-02-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 05:23:37 +0100 Source: partman-nbd Binary: partman-nbd Architecture: source all Version: 0.43 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Bug#853755: installation-reports: ppc64el fails to boot after installation

2017-02-01 Thread Erwan Prioul
Hi KiBi, On 01/31/2017 08:04 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Erwan, > > Erwan Prioul (2017-01-31): >> Package: installation-reports >> >> Boot method: ISO image >> Image version: >>

Processing of partman-nbd_0.43_i386.changes

2017-02-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
partman-nbd_0.43_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-nbd_0.43.dsc partman-nbd_0.43.tar.xz partman-nbd_0.43_all.udeb partman-nbd_0.43_i386.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Re: Do I have to do anything to make sure ext4lazyinit works as being advertised ?

2017-02-01 Thread shirish शिरीष
Hi all, Please see below - shirish शिरीष writes: > Dear Dmitry, > > I saw your patch about regression testing for ext4lazyinit > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9285509/ - that is where I got your mail > id. > > > I am a bit curious to know as to why the author/ess