Bug#980777: FIT-PC: Fails to find driver for Ethernet, Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8100/8101L/8139 PCI

2021-01-24 Thread Charles Curley
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 21:28:26 +0100 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi! > > On 1/24/21 4:50 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > OK. This might be a bug in the i386 iso - as you've seen, we can't > > test all i386 easily. This might just be a regression. Given that > > we're about to release 10.8

Bug#980777: FIT-PC: Fails to find driver for Ethernet, Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8100/8101L/8139 PCI

2021-01-24 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! On 1/24/21 4:50 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > OK. This might be a bug in the i386 iso - as you've seen, we can't test all > i386 easily. This might just be a regression. Given that we're about to > release > 10.8 on Feb 6th, can I suggest that you send a mail into debian-boot > (or debian

Bug#980777: FIT-PC: Fails to find driver for Ethernet, Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8100/8101L/8139 PCI

2021-01-24 Thread Charles Curley
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:50:54 + "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote: > These are the machines with Geode but limited to 256M memory? As a > matter of interest, what are you using them for - what's the use case > - because 256M is marginal now, I think. It's actually 223M, the remainder used for the

Bug#980777: FIT-PC: Fails to find driver for Ethernet, Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8100/8101L/8139 PCI

2021-01-24 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 05:03:35PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 20:07:22 + > "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote: > > > > > 8.6 is old - I'd be surprised that 10.7 firmware iso wouldn't > > > > work. > > > > > > I didn't try 10.x. 8.6 was what I had handy, i.e. it came up

Bug#980929: reportbug and installation-report

2021-01-24 Thread Nis Martensen
Package: installation-report Severity: normal Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-report...@lists.debian.org What do you think about including the installation-report message template directly in reportbug? In reportbug's GTK interface, the output of bugscripts is not handed to the user for

Re: Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1

2021-01-24 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-01-22 16:38:28 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Assuming that a patched m2crypto will also build fine against openssl > 1.1.1d, then there's no reason that the two shouldn't proceed in > parallel (i.e. feel free to file the m2crypto request already). Yes, it does. Bug filled. Thank you.

Re: Bug#959469: buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1g-1

2021-01-24 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-01-22 16:38:28 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Both would be good, please. here is the with the two additional patches. Sebastian diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 088c914a3dd4a..56a950734f01d 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@