Re: Bug#988814: unblock: gtk+2.0/2.24.33-2

Hi, Paul Gevers (2021-05-20): > On 19-05-2021 21:54, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Please unblock package gtk+2.0 > > Ok from my side. As this upload is to fix the d-i issue I'm pretty sure > that debian-boot is also fine, but I promised kibi this morning that > I'll follow the process and wait for

Re: URGENT..! Very annoying when UPDATE = debian.map.fastlydns.net

You may have noticed that you didn't get any responses.  Your message was caught by my spamfilter, and was furthermore not very clear. As for your error, it seems likely that there is an error with the internet connection.  Why and how I cannot tell you, as there is not enough information

Re: Bug#988797: RC1 installation report

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:59:37AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > Op 19-05-2021 om 20:06 schreef Cyril Brulebois: > > Goedendag Paul, > > > > and thanks for your report. > > > > Paul van der Vlis (2021-05-19): > > Correction, I did use: "pci=noaer", no capitals. > > I guess this will

Re: Bug#988830: [pre-approval] unblock e2fsprogs [Was: Bug#987641: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on armel/armhf with a 64-bit kernel]

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:55:34PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Paul Gevers (2021-05-20): > > On 20-05-2021 00:11, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, there was no release.debian.org bug to track this. Due > > to the current high volume to our list, this fell from the radar. To >

Re: Bug#988585: unblock: grub2/2.04-18

Paul Gevers (2021-05-20): > This needs an ACK from d-boot as well. No objections, thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#988830: [pre-approval] unblock e2fsprogs [Was: Bug#987641: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on armel/armhf with a 64-bit kernel]

Hi Ted, Paul Gevers (2021-05-20): > On 20-05-2021 00:11, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > Ping to the debian-release bug. > > Unfortunately, there was no release.debian.org bug to track this. Due > to the current high volume to our list, this fell from the radar. To > avoid this I now generate a

Re: moving graphical installer to GTK 3

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 08:54:29AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 5/20/21 12:54 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Even if was decided to recommend that new users use live media for > > installations, the flexibility of d-i is massively powerful, and we > > shouldn't give up on it. The

Re: Bug#988585: unblock: grub2/2.04-18

Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed Hi, This needs an ACK from d-boot as well. On 16-05-2021 12:05, Colin Watson wrote: > Please unblock grub2 2.04-18. This is mostly fixes from Steve to sort > out UEFI Secure Boot on i386. The upstream patch to fix section size > calculation *seems* to only fix a

Re: Bug#988814: unblock: gtk+2.0/2.24.33-2

Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i On 19-05-2021 21:54, Simon McVittie wrote: > Please unblock package gtk+2.0 Ok from my side. As this upload is to fix the d-i issue I'm pretty sure that debian-boot is also fine, but I promised kibi this morning that I'll follow the process and wait for an explicit

Re: moving graphical installer to GTK 3

On 5/20/21 12:54 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Even if was decided to recommend that new users use live media for > installations, the flexibility of d-i is massively powerful, and we > shouldn't give up on it. The ability to support everything from a > serial terminal up to a graphical installer on

Re: moving graphical installer to GTK 3

On 5/20/2021 12:54 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:27:56AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Simon McVittie (2021-05-17): Even if was decided to recommend that new users use live media for installations, the flexibility of d-i is massively powerful, and we shouldn't give up

Re: Bug#988740: unblock: glibc/2.31-12

Hi Cyril On 20-05-2021 08:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Having udeb-producing packages change under our feet when we're in > the middle of unentangling the rendering mess isn't exactly nice… I'm terribly sorry, but I thought we discussed migrating udeb generating packages recently on IRC

Re: Bug#988740: unblock: glibc/2.31-12

Hi, Aurelien Jarno (2021-05-18): > [ Risks ] > The fixes related to the testsuite involves many changes to our build > system, by letting the upstream makefiles to install the ld.so symlink > instead of doing it in the Debian makefiles, in an architecture specific > way for bi/tri-arch packages.