Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?

2021-09-04 Thread J. William Campbell
On 9/4/2021 4:47 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote: On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:00:06 -0700 "J. William Campbell" wrote: but if we are talking about a /boot partition, there is no good reason to change it to ext4. Ext4 is reliable than ext2, I guess. And, /boot needs it. Ext4 is more reliable than ext2

Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?

2021-09-04 Thread Rick Thomas
Would it be possible to make uboot (and/or any of the other non-grub boot loaders) load grub, which then would load and configure the kernel from an ext4 or LVM partition? Rick

Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?

2021-09-04 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 21:43:50 +0100 Steve McIntyre wrote: > Ummm. In my experience quite a number of older armel/armhf devices > booting using U-Boot may *not* be able to boot using ext4. I don't have any knowledge about U-Boot and arm devices, so here's a question. Is U-Boot different on each

Bug#993668: CUPS is missing after a default GNOME Desktop Install

2021-09-04 Thread Nader Nooryani
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I have the packages you mention as well as ipp-usb. Will Debian detect and add both driverless-enabled printers and ones that require drivers? When I check Settings -> Printers in GNOME I am presented with this "Sorry! The system printing service doesn't seem

Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?

2021-09-04 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:00:06 -0700 "J. William Campbell" wrote: > but if we are talking about a > /boot partition, there is no good reason to change it to ext4. Ext4 is reliable than ext2, I guess. And, /boot needs it. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp

Bug#993668: CUPS is missing after a default GNOME Desktop Install

2021-09-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Holger Wansing wrote (Sat, 4 Sep 2021 21:09:56 +0200): > (BTW: CUPS also gets installed with the other desktops via > gnome-core -> system-config-printer-common -> cups-pk-helper -> libcups2) Hrr, copy-and-paste error here. Should have been: (BTW: CUPS also gets installed with the other

Bug#993668: CUPS is missing after a default GNOME Desktop Install

2021-09-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Nader Nooryani wrote (Sat, 4 Sep 2021 16:16:50 +0200): > As of Debian 11, Print Server is no longer included as an option in the > Debian installer if you use the defaults: Debian desktop environment, GNOME > and standard system utilities. Ref: >

Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?

2021-09-04 Thread J. William Campbell
On 9/4/2021 1:44 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 9/4/21 22:32, Hideki Yamane wrote: On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:33:37 +0200 Ben Hutchings wrote: This is bug #985463. If we can confirm no architecture has a limit to use ext2 now, then we can change it to ext4, right? I may have

Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?

2021-09-04 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/4/21 22:32, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:33:37 +0200 > Ben Hutchings wrote: >> This is bug #985463. > > If we can confirm no architecture has a limit to use ext2 now, > then we can change it to ext4, right? We should make a list with the bootloaders in use. Many

Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?

2021-09-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 05:32:51AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: >On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:33:37 +0200 >Ben Hutchings wrote: >> This is bug #985463. > > If we can confirm no architecture has a limit to use ext2 now, > then we can change it to ext4, right? Ummm. In my experience quite a number of

Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?

2021-09-04 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:33:37 +0200 Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is bug #985463. If we can confirm no architecture has a limit to use ext2 now, then we can change it to ext4, right? -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp

Re: Need help debootstrapping Ubuntu impish

2021-09-04 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 03:50:39PM +, Joshua Peisach wrote: > Hello Boot team, > > I'm coming after asking for help from the live-team. The issue was narrowed > to debootstrap. I'm trying to build an impish image for Ubuntu Cinnamon > Remix, and I'm having issues with the base packages. >

Need help debootstrapping Ubuntu impish

2021-09-04 Thread Joshua Peisach
Hello Boot team, I'm coming after asking for help from the live-team. The issue was narrowed to debootstrap. I'm trying to build an impish image for Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix, and I'm having issues with the base packages. Last time I had an issue was with pinetab/pine64 stuff, and we could safely

Bug#993668: CUPS is missing after a default GNOME Desktop Install

2021-09-04 Thread Nader Nooryani
Package: task-gnome-desktop Version: 3.68 As of Debian 11, Print Server is no longer included as an option in the Debian installer if you use the defaults: Debian desktop environment, GNOME and standard system utilities. Ref: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950553 This leaves

Re: Bug#992693: bullseye-pu: package glibc/2.31-13+deb11u1

2021-09-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 14:58 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > During the upgrade from Buster to Bullseye, the SSH server is not > restarted following the libc6 upgrade, causing new SSH connections to > get rejected until the SSH server is restarted later in the

CUPS missing after default desktop install

2021-09-04 Thread Nader Nooryani
Hello I am not quite sure where to file this, so apologies if I send this to the wrong place. Since Print Server is no longer included as an option in the Debian installer it leaves users without CUPS after a default install. This should perhaps be included in task-gnome-desktop? I have