debian-installer-netboot-images_20230526_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2023-05-29 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 01:06:36 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20230526 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

Re: Bug#1036933: screen-udeb: Should screen really be installed setgid utmp?

2023-05-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hallo Sven, Sven Joachim (2023-05-29): > Recently I noticed that the screen program in the screen-udeb package > is installed setgid utmp, and I wonder if this actually makes any > sense. While I do not have much experience with the installer, I > would expect it to run all programs as root

Bug#1036933: screen-udeb: Should screen really be installed setgid utmp?

2023-05-29 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: screen-udeb Version: 4.9.0-4 Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: Sven Joachim , debian-boot@lists.debian.org Recently I noticed that the screen program in the screen-udeb package is installed setgid utmp, and I wonder if this actually makes any sense. While I do not have much experience with the

Re: os-prober not detecting distros mounting ESP as /boot

2023-05-29 Thread Pascal Hambourg
On 29/05/2023 at 08:17, Avid Seeker wrote: I'm dual booting two distros that mount ESP as /boot instead of /boot/efi. It seems to me that os-prober works by checking every partition for /boot, and so if it finds it empty, it doesn't consider it an OS. So when I run os-prober from either

os-prober not detecting distros mounting ESP as /boot

2023-05-29 Thread Avid Seeker
I'm dual booting two distros that mount ESP as /boot instead of /boot/efi. It seems to me that os-prober works by checking every partition for /boot, and so if it finds it empty, it doesn't consider it an OS. So when I run os-prober from either distro, the other one is not detected.