✈omg useful article

Hi, I've read an article recently, it seems to be really packed with amazing facts, it could interest you too. You may red it here http://www.ngocacr.com/hearing.php?UE9kZWJpYW4taW5zdGFsbGVyQHBhY2thZ2VzLmRlYmlhbi5vcmc- See you soon, Andrew Shadura From: debian-installer

☂nice place

Hi, I've recently visited a nice place, just take a look, you are going to love it for sure! Here are some pics of it http://www.thewintersfamily.net/usually.php?UE9kZWJpYW4taW5zdGFsbGVyQHBhY2thZ2VzLmRlYmlhbi5vcmc- Andrew Shadura From: debian-installer [mailto:debian-instal

❤Fw: yahoo this is simply the coolest stuff ever

Hello, Just wished to show that cool stuff I've just found, I'm simply impressed) take a look http://www.gymn32.ru/struggle.php?UE9kZWJpYW4taW5zdGFsbGVyQHBhY2thZ2VzLmRlYmlhbi5vcmc- Warm regards, Andrew Shadura

Re: Bug#854181: RFH: busybox -- Tiny utilities for small and embedded systems

Hi, On 4 Feb 2017 19:16, "Cyril Brulebois" wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, We're entering the deep freeze in a few hours, and this mail should have been sent a while ago, but let's not delay this any further: the Debian Installer team requests assistance with

Re: Bug#832004: jessie-pu: package wpa/2.3-1+deb8u4

On 21/07/16 12:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On 2016-07-21 11:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > [...] >> +wpa (2.3-1+deb8u4) jessie-security; urgency=medium >> >> The distribution there should be "jessie" (and was in the earlier >> diff). With that changed,

Re: Bug#832004: jessie-pu: package wpa/2.3-1+deb8u4

On 21/07/16 12:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On 2016-07-21 11:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > [...] >> +wpa (2.3-1+deb8u4) jessie-security; urgency=medium >> >> The distribution there should be "jessie" (and was in the earlier >> diff). With that changed,

Bug#770078: ifupdown: interfaces(5) falsely claims that interfaces.d is included by default on new installs

Hello, On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 20:42:32 +0100 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Back to this request I lost track of: - I haven't seen any files shipped in the target directory in any package; am I missing anything? - If no packages ship such a file I'll probably push the change to

Bug#770078: ifupdown: interfaces(5) falsely claims that interfaces.d is included by default on new installs

I'd really appreciate any comment on this from d-i maintainers. -- Cheers, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#770078: ifupdown: interfaces(5) falsely claims that interfaces.d is included by default on new installs

Hello, On 27 November 2014 at 15:26, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: You probably want to look at debcheckout netcfg; write_interface.c is most likely the interesting one, along with base-installer.d/40netcfg and finish-install.d/55netcfg-copy-config which you may want to check as well

Bug#770078: ifupdown: interfaces(5) falsely claims that interfaces.d is included by default on new installs

Hello, On 27 November 2014 at 16:07, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Am I correct in assuming that such an /e/n/i file with an older ifupdown doesn't cause any issues? I'd also like to know whether it can cause any issues with other tools parsing/using/abusing /e/n/i (n-m notably). It

Bug#770078: ifupdown: interfaces(5) falsely claims that interfaces.d is included by default on new installs

Hello, On 27 November 2014 at 16:28, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: source /etc/network/interfaces.d/* This would probably be safer at this point of the release cycle indeed. We can think about switching it early during the stretch release cycle. That means the current documentation

Bug#770078: ifupdown: interfaces(5) falsely claims that interfaces.d is included by default on new installs

Hello, On 27 November 2014 at 16:48, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: I have the attached patch pending locally; not pushing right now to avoid an accidental upload while I haven't got around to requesting a few unblock/unblock-udeb (one of which is about netcfg). Thanks. -- Cheers,

Re: Bug#770078: ifupdown: interfaces(5) falsely claims that interfaces.d is included by default on new installs

Hello, On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:15:00 -0700 Peter Karbaliotis peter.karbalio...@gmail.com wrote: The interfaces(5) man page claims: By default, on a freshly installed Debian system, the interfaces file includes a line to source /etc/network/interfaces.d directory. but on two new jessie

Bug#701884: kfreebsd: unknown method 'inet6 auto'

Hello, On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:39:04 + Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote: I think at this stage it would be simplest to add an 'inet6 auto' implementation to ifupdown on kfreebsd to fix this bug. It can be copied from method 'dhcp', minus the dhclient lines. While here, I

Bug#701884: kfreebsd: unknown method 'inet6 auto'

Hello, (Overquoting a bit, as other recipients have fallen out of Cc loop) On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:52:16 -0800 Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote: Andrew Shadura bugzi...@tut.by writes: On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:33:08 -0800 Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote: Also

Ifupdown, loopback interface, /etc/network/interfaces.d

to migrate them automatically. I'd like to hear opinions on this idea. The current version of the patch is attached. -- WBR, Andrew From: Andrew Shadura bugzi...@tut.by Subject: Move loopback definition under /etc/network/interfaces.d, Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 20:27:13 +0100 Commit-Id: 534