On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:38:03AM +0200, Alfredo Sola wrote:
Not sure if this is the right place, but here it goes. As we all
know, sun servers without a framebuffer (and certain other x86s too)
need to be configured and installed via a serial console that speaks at
9600 bps by
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:27:03AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
Silo 1.4.6 does not solve the initrd loading problem. (The changelog entry
was unclear if it should or not.)
The d-i image at
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/sparc/20040629/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
gets
I did some checking, and the newer memory allocation in SILO was not
verifying that the initrd physical location was in the lower 32-bits
address range. The kernel only accepts a 32-bit address range for
initrd's. I re-added the check, so now SILO will put out a decent
failure.
I suspect that in
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:41:25PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:08:22 -0400
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that in the long run, I really need to make it so that the
initrd gets lower memory precendence over the kernel. The kernel itself
can
Then today (don't know why this idea came to me) I decided to open up
the box and juggle around with the memory sticks. And voila! Moving the
two sticks from DIMM3 and DIMM4 to DIMM1 and DIMM2 made the initrd
issue go away (booted with default SILO parameters). Dunno why Sarge is
picky,
FYI, someone reported that adding rootfstype=ext2 made the images
bootable. Looks like something in the kernel isn't checking the initrd
for ext2. So this may not be a SILO problem (I know Josh is already
aware of this, but others are probably interested in the results here).
--
Debian -
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 05:19:32PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Folks,
Thanks to some surprising sleuth work by Boris Gontar we might have a
workaround for the dastardly initrd bug affecting certain sparc64
machines.
So, without further ado:
*
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 04:13:32PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 05 June 2004 14:57, Ben Collins wrote:
FYI, someone reported that adding rootfstype=ext2 made the images
bootable. Looks like something in the kernel isn't
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 05:09:06PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 May 2004 05:44, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Folks,
Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2.
Tom Callaway suggested that I try this because
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 08:44:58PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Folks,
Here is a mini-ISO image I cooked up with SILO rolled back to 1.3.2. Tom
Callaway suggested that I try this because a lot of new stuff related to
initrds changed in 1.4.x.
http://june.voxel.net/~joshk/mini.iso
The only
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:48:46PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:09:20PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Interesting. Where did you get these images from? people.d.o/~jbailey?
Also I assume this is on sparc64, right?
^-- please answer, it's important :)
I got it from
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:17:24PM +0200, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 07:28:16AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Does debian-installer require devfs=mount is a boot param still? We have
a fix to make the sparc/sparc64 kernel images default with this command
line
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 11:21:01PM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
For what it's worth, I get the same thing reported earlier when trying
this image on my Ultra 5:
NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
Freeing initrd
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 07:50:44AM -0700, Patrick Morris wrote:
boot:
Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel
Uncompressing image...
Loaded kernel version 2.4.26
Loading initial ramdisk (1477459 bytes at 0x10C0 phys, 0x40C0
virt)...
Remapping the kernel... Done
Booting
RAMDISK: Couldn't find valid RAM disk image starting at 0.
Freeing initrd memory: 1442 freed
cramfs: wrong magic
Wait a second. Is this ramdisk really cramfs, or is it romfs?
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion -
Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
Ok, there's a new second.b on sparc-boot.org/pub/testing/. Give that a
shot.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard -
I hope that this resolves the issues with SILO and initrd!
Me too!
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-14 16:53]:
I did not have any problem, only some warning during boot of the CDROM
about unimplemented SPARC instruction.
When I boot I still have these warnings:
% dmesg |
I got the same type of warnings between the boot of the CDROM kernel and
the first stage of the installer.
Let's ask debian-sparc about this. So apparently the system boots
fine, but those warnings are displayed. Can/should anything be done
about this?
Am I to understand that
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:18:40PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Am I to understand that this is based on the new cd image with my
silo/kernel fixes?
Probably since this ISO was built on 20040511.
If so, did you have problems
Ultra1: On this one, I got (modulo any typos)
Loading initial ramdisk (1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys 022340800 virt) ...
[spinning \/]
Remapping the kernel ... FP Disabled
ok
and I was back to the OpenBoot 'ok' prompt.
This is strange.
Ultra10: On this one, I got much
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 07:58:09PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:36:22PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Can you (and anyone else testing this initrd) send me the Loading
initrd line from silo aswell as the prtconf -pv output from the
machine if you are able to.
I
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 08:47:45PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:06:02PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
So SILO doesn't have a message like:
Loading initial ramdisk bytes size (at addr phys, addr virt)
Humpf, it was booting from hard disk.
I have this:
Loading
loaded kernel version 2.4.26
Loading initial ramdisk ( 1477684 bytes at 0x01x phys, 0x6080 virt)
Crap, silo's printf doesn't support lx or llx. I need to fix that,
because I really need that info.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion -
Thanks for trying it out. Ben, was that patch supposed to actually fix
something, or was it just supposed to be informative?
Both.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
To my current knowledge, all of them can be removed with the following
exceptions:
- kernel-image-2.2.25-mac
- kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-udeb
- kernel-patch-2.2.25-m68k
- kernel-source-2.2.25
You can't remove the sparc ones. 2.2 is the only thing that runs stable
on sparc32's (all
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the
fdisk udeb wasn't getting loaded for some reason. I'm hoping that the
whole partman
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:14:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
I also remember (was it Thomas
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:23:34AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 11:26, Ben Collins wrote:
Hmm... Why don't we just use parted for now, until a better solution
comes around? It's in the archive, and AFAICT supports Sparc. (ia64
uses it right now, too)
I know
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:48:42PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:35:21PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why depmod, insmod, and modprobe are give the
error that the sparc64 kernel modules are not for this architecture on
my latest d-i boot cds.
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:35:21PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why depmod, insmod, and modprobe are give the
error that the sparc64 kernel modules are not for this architecture on
my latest d-i boot cds. I'm using the ones in the modutils-full udeb,
uname -m reports
But there has been only some activity on sparc, mipsel, alpha, m69k
(amiga), and s390; and little or progress on hppa, arm, various m68k
subarches, and many less common powerpc subarches; and many of these
architectures are nowhere near working.
FYI, after I fix some SILO issues this weekend,
(please Cc, not on list)
I cannot build the debian-installer on a 2.5 system because depmod
fails. The reason is that unless depmod is given a symbols file
(System.map) it tries to get symbol information from the kernel.
I notice that the i386 kernel udeb includes modules.dep. Would it be
better
One person mentioned that older cd-roms don't always like cd-rw media and
that might be the source of my error. For reference sake, I think that may
be a part of it but I also looked at a sun documentation page of sparc
boot-proms and noticed that you can boot different cd-rom partitions and
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Tim Spriggs wrote:
Hello,
I have been having some serious issues trying to get a
SparcStation 20 to boot. In order to install debian I had to net-boot the
machine since it did not like the cd-rom for some reason.
The installation
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
custom kernel to file/mnt/linux.bin.gz/file.
pIf you want to be complete about it, you'll also want to gzip the
-System.map from your custom kernel and place it in file/mnt/file
+System.map from your custom kernel, gzip it and place it in file/mnt/file
as
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:42:57PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 20020411
Severity: important
I downloaded all bf2.4 files from www.debian.org:
rescue.bin
root.bin
linux.bin
install.bat
basedebs.tar
and placed them in the correct directories (Note
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:25:57PM -0400, Aravind Vinnakota wrote:
Hi all!
I just started using Debian. I am trying to install debian on Sun Ultra
5 machine. I tried 3 different ways to install it but could'nt:
1) I downloaded the CD images. I tried to burn it on CDs but the images
seem
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:07:38AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
Jim Westveer wrote on Thu Apr 04, 2002 um 05:24:24PM:
And last, woody ought to be 2.2 based and not 2.4 based ... but since I
also find it lame to use 2.2.x by default nowadays ...
I disagree, 2.4.x
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:51:09AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 02:45:30PM -0500 wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:17:59PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On an Ultra1, 384MB boot-floppies 3.0.20-2002-03-07:
2b3000 TILO
Selecting sun4u kernel...
Memory
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 09:40:54AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Package: kernel-image-sparc-2.4
Severity: wishlist
#include hallo.h
Ben Collins [DPL] wrote on Fri Mar 22, 2002 um 01:45:00AM:
I have no idea what you are attempting to do, but that does an iBook
install problem have to do
'.
Fixed in 2.4.18 images.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
'.
Fixed in 2.4.18 images.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
in the next kernel upload.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
severity 132671 serious
thanks
thanks
#include hallo.h
Ben Collins [DPL] wrote on Sat Mar 02, 2002 um 08:06:36PM:
If nobody wants to build BFs for Sparc, we should just downgrade
severities of their bug reports.
Uh, someone is building boot-floppies for sparc, we've just
back and help coordinate the final woody
boot-floppies
Excellent. I'll start my new builds using this version (for sparc)
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL
for sparc, we've just been
waiting for a decent kernel to use.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
the severity of the bug, and we
will certainly have to fix it for release.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
an alternative
package ?
Better to not provide an alternative. It would be useless. Fsck is run
from automated scripts, so no-one would get the fixes without a lot of
mucking around.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:11:27PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:01:12PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
So I suppose it won't be OK, then... better provide an alternative
package ?
Better to not provide an alternative.
Woops, wrong wording :) Sure !
Replaces
- Forwarded message from Rich Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
X-Virus-Scanner: McAfee Virus Engine
X-Spam-Status: Scanner Called
X-Sent: 2 Feb 2002 15:14:43 GMT
From: Rich Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#131709: chroot segfaults
X-Spam-Status
bit of
information.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
(0xc1d8 0xc1d0)
disabling initrd
What can i do ?
How much memory do you have?
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux--WatchGuard.com \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
images.
Explaining what do not boot means might help. How far do they get?
Have you tried the linux-a.out images? Have you tried booting them with
-p to see the extent of the kernel outpu?
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins
should pull it in.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:59:22PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
Package: debootstrap
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 02:49:42AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
The perl-base package was not installed. Neither was ldso (which is on the
same line in install-debs as base-files and base-passwd). So
not have done it
intentionally but it sounds like you got the right result. :-)
Wouldn't building the .so with non-PIC break quite a few things?
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 12:53:08PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Sat Jun 16, 2001 at 10:52:25AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 02:55:30PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
Wouldn't building the .so with non-PIC break quite a few things?
Shouldn't do, as far as I can
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:22:50PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Sat Jun 16, 2001 at 03:04:28PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
Uh, wrong. We compile _all_ shared libs using -fPIC (IOW, every .so).
That has nothing to do with mklibs.sh, it has to do with being a shared
lib. If you try to link
, where libgcc.a is
compiled with -fPIC. Tell it to libtool that also uses -fPIC on all
linux elf platforms.
I think common practice negates your theory.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian
.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
arch
though.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
)
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
they used the dialog frontend
than anything else.
Used or prefered? I use dialog more, only because I'm too lazy to change
the default. However, I prefer the slang/stool frontend.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
make sure it gets translated.
Thanks. Also, I would suggest showing the current state of things as
woody _was_ shown as stable and potato was shown as archived. Can
this be updated aswell?
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:38:24AM +0200, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
On Sat, May 12, Ben Collins wrote:
Let me know how things go.
http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/
For netboot, you should only need the tftpimage under the subarch
directory of your choice
/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/
For netboot, you should only need the tftpimage under the subarch
directory of your choice. The rest of the install should be able to
download everything else itself.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 04:40:51PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These are based on the latest CVS of boot-floppies. The major change is
that the sun4u images are built from the 2.4.4 kernel images. The best
part about this is that this means
, the Unimplemented system call
has nothing to do with it.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
of `__bzero'
Filing a bug on kernel-image-sparc-2.4...
Boot floppies should really get it's own set of local headers so it
doesn't have to include kernel headers. This will avoid the conflicts.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
fore I get this error (on inserting the driver-1.bin image from
ftp.debian.org):
Could you try the newer sparc boot floppies at this url
http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disk-sparc/current/
Thanks
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ B
installation so that something will install?
dpkg -i libc6_2.2.2-4.deb libdb2_2.7.7-7.deb
Fairly simple.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
need to copy pam_unix.so, and make sure you copied
/etc/pam.d/login (and removed all lines that do not pertain to
pam_unix.so).
Or, you can just download the shadow source and recompile without PAM
support.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben
everything. I'm not exactly sure what I
am going to do with this script yet. Hopefully package it for
installation as needed (and to make it distribution and architecture
neutral).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
?
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
it. I'm going to produce some woody boot-floppies soon, perhaps
that will resolve the problem.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
on that (there was a discussion on this
topic a couple of days ago).
Other archs doesn't matter. LILO never supported anything other than
x86, and so neither will GRUB, and so it wont matter :)
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage
gather not...)
Sparc has pre11 in incoming, so go with that for us (I can change it, if
you want).
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
386, and C elsewhere.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
) and also remove the
backward compat crap that makes it so crufty.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 06:46:22PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
Ben Collins wrote:
Actually, what I am going to do is take over this script, and have it
installed with libc6-pic. It will then be guranteed to work with that
version. Then boot-floppies can work with this however it wants to. I'll
I have to do is create a boot-block installer, and a set of
kernel-image*.udeb packages to get it working on sparc? I'm very
concerned that portability is becoming an afterthought.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 02:12:43PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
Ben Collins wrote:
I'm sitting here looking at an obvious build failure for
kernel-image-di on the sparc buildd, and I'm wondering what the heck
this package is for anyway. I mean, is this thing supposed to be
portable
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 06:34:59AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
Ben Collins wrote:
For sparc, there has to be atleast two different boot kernels. One for
sun4cdm (32bit CPU), and one for sun4u (64bit CPU). SPARC also supports
native netbooting (via RARP/TFTP). My main concern
about a lot of
work being done without enough consideration for the effects on other
ports.
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PR
it
would be much easier to maintain. Plus it means main modutils stays in
sync with udeb insmod.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
ate a udeb?
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
.
I'll get working on this between now and next week.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:51:41PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a bug in the dboostrap program. I am going to fix it this
evening and get a new set of boot-floppies uploaded.
Hmm, ok, well, if you wanna release and upload sources for 2.2.21
.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
isk 1".
Are the right floppy images loaded on the FTP site?
This is a bug in the dboostrap program. I am going to fix it this
evening and get a new set of boot-floppies uploaded.
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that f
t the
images.
Thanks for the workaround.
--
---===-=-==-=-------==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
it will take up trying
to get full.
Also, ramfs is a 2.4.x only feature. Hopefully we are releasing with 2.4.x
anyway.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED
, and not multiple?
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED
your purposes, rather than risk
messing up the current function.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=-------==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
