On Friday 08 August 2014 15:15:17 vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
Hi,
I'm not a Debian developer, just a Debian user, and I want to say that I
was happy to see XFCE being the default DE. Just because it's small,
classic and neutral DE - which GNOME 3 definitely isn't. I think XFCE is
a better
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:13, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:56, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
I just finish a new net-install with the daily builds 20060918 of
testing. I have a strange bug with the network after the first reboot.
lo become eth0
eth0 become eth1_temp
and I
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 13:15, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
[snip]
What happens is that t-rex builds an ecoff image, I suppose this is what
the firmware on a real decstation would boot. However gxemul does not
have any firmware, it only knows how to load an ELF file
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 18:06, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
David Goodenough wrote:
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 13:15, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
[snip]
What happens is that t-rex builds an ecoff image, I suppose this is
what the firmware on a real decstation
On Friday 21 April 2006 14:32, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 20 April 2006 10:44, David Goodenough wrote:
Yes I think I need dmraid. Looking at the Debian Installer FAQ there
is reference to using the installer Device Manager.
Not sure what you mean. The only reference to dmraid I can find
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:57, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:26, David Goodenough wrote:
I have a machine (a Tyan GT24) with two SATA disks, both of which are
in raid mirror.
Without the RAID setup, the current etch beta installs fine.
With RAID however neither
I have a machine (a Tyan GT24) with two SATA disks, both of which are in
raid mirror.
Without the RAID setup, the current etch beta installs fine.
With RAID however neither GRUB nor LILO seem to like the disks.
Grub says it installed to (hd0), but when you boot it clears the screen
and just
I am trying to build a small system with no moving parts. So I bought a
fanless mini-ITX board and a Compact Flash card, with an IDE to CF adapter.
Because the CF is only 256MB Debian etch will not install, so I put an old
1GB IDE disk onto the system, did a base install, removed things like
On an unstable system that is fully up to date, once I have completed an
install can I remove discover. I would have thought that udev would do
everything that discover used to do. Actually of course I am asking about
discover1, but the question is much the same either way.
David
--
To
Package: installation-reports
Version: rc2
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Below is the lspci and lspci -n output for this system.
This system has an ATI IGP chip in it (1002:5835) but this is not
recognised as a radeon chipset. So the resulting system ends up
On Friday 26 November 2004 16:48, Joey Hess wrote:
David Goodenough wrote:
the BCM4401 chip - ID 14e4:170c is identified correctly but is not
automatically loaded.
WHat makes you think that it was detected if the installer does not load
the module?
I did not say it was detected, I said
I have a server which runs apt-cacher. I use it for all apt-get updates and
upgrades on my system, but I have had no luck trying to install using it.
I tried setting it as the proxy (i.e. using the insertion of the proxy bit
at the start of the URL to gain access to the server), but that did
On Thursday 25 November 2004 10:51, David Goodenough wrote:
I have a server which runs apt-cacher. I use it for all apt-get updates
and upgrades on my system, but I have had no luck trying to install using
it.
I tried setting it as the proxy (i.e. using the insertion of the proxy bit
On Thursday 25 November 2004 11:19, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:51:57AM +, David Goodenough wrote:
I have a server which runs apt-cacher. I use it for all apt-get updates
and upgrades on my system, but I have had no luck trying to install using
it.
I tried
On Thursday 25 November 2004 12:01, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 11:49:33AM +, David Goodenough wrote:
10.0.1.1/apt-cacher/mirror.ox.ac.uk
then the directory took the default /debian/, no proxy and then entered
http as the protocol. That took me straight back
Package: installation-reports
Version: rc2
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Below is the lspci and lspci -n output for this device. There are several
devices that are not identified
(the Host Bridge, PCI Bridge, IDE interface, ISA bridge). But these seem to
I have just completed an install onto a Samsung P28 laptop, which comes with
a BCM5705M ethernet port. I was using the business card pre-R2 installer.
I was using expert26 as I was installing unstable.
The installer did not find this ethernet port, and thus I was unable to
proceed until I had
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 17:30, Frans Pop wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 18:17, David Goodenough wrote:
I have just completed an install onto a Samsung P28 laptop, which comes
with a BCM5705M ethernet port. I was using the business
18 matches
Mail list logo
