On 13/02/2023 22:40, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 13 févr. 2023 14:50:33 +0100, a ecrit:
gregor herrmann, le lun. 13 févr. 2023 00:26:54 +0100, a ecrit:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 00:09:20 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Debian FTP Masters (2023-02-11):
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 11
On 05/05/2021 07:26, Ryan Tandy wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package micro-evtd
[ Reason ]
One-line patch to fix FTBFS (#987631). Also taking the opportunity to update the
Maintainer field; I
On 08/03/2019 10:07, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 923694
>
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 at 22:21:31 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> meta-gnome3
On 08/02/2019 17:21, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 at 16:48:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> I'm not sure how to hide a particular entry on a particular arch; I'm
>> not a tasksel expert and won't be one in the next 5 minutes. But it
>> seems to me the immediate concern was about
r with
> gjs 1.52.x (which has a backport of those changes done by a developer who does
> not have in-depth knowledge of gjs, namely me); so I would like to ask for a
> freeze exception to complete this transition.
Yes, it is my intention to finish this.
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at
Hi Cyril,
On 17/12/2018 15:56, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:00:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 13/12/2018 16:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> task-pkgs-are-installable-faux depends on task-gnome-desktop, which depends
>>> on
Hi Cyril,
On 06/12/2018 18:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing:
>
> dak copy-installer 20181206
>
>
> Release team: FYI, I've urgented it.
Can the udeb block be lifted now, or are there still things to do?
Thanks,
Emilio
On 18/04/18 01:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> That's another perfect example why udeb additions should get reviewed:
> we would have noticed another buggy package, and its bugginess might not
> have been copied over to another package.
I'm sure people don't request those reviews because they don't
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.82
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
(d-i's RM / debian-boot@ Cc'ed.)
A package that builds a udeb and ships a shared library ought to include that
udeb in the respective shared libraries' shlibs. This is achieved by passing
the --add-udeb option to dh_makeshlibs. A broken
On 04/07/17 16:34, Charles Chambers wrote:
> Might a lowly user propose taking an extra month so that more of the bugs
> installing 9.0 can be worked out?
>
> It is summer, after all.
There will be a 9.2 release. Whatever doesn't get included in 9.1 can be fixed
in 9.2. If we applied that
Another round:
- pcre3
- screen
- glib2.0
- dmraid
- debootstrap
Thanks,
Emilio
On 22/03/17 20:41, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package bind9. It just fixes the a bit illadviced and
> unconfigurable use of /dev/random in several critical parts of
On 22/03/17 20:35, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package lvm2/2.02.168-2. It fixes a bunch of RC bugs.
Ack. Needs a kibi-ack.
Cheers,
Emilio
>
> diff --git
On 17/03/17 23:27, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package xfsprogs
>
> I contains a single fix to better support merged-usr systems.
> This change had already been applied
On 16/03/17 19:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2017-03-16):
>> On 16/03/17 16:32, Colin Watson wrote:
>>> Control: reopen -1
>>> Control: retitle -1 unblock: openssh/1:7.4p1-9
>>>
>>> I'm afraid that
On 16/03/17 16:32, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: openssh/1:7.4p1-9
>
> I'm afraid that 1:7.4p1-8 caused a CI failure, and on investigation this
> was a real problem easily reproduced in a local adt-run. Sorry for not
> noticing this earlier. I've
On 16/03/17 12:07, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package debian-edu-install, it fixes an important bug
> (#856493),
> which needs a oneliner fix in
On 15/03/17 16:40, Colin Watson wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:09:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Colin Watson:
>>> unblock openssh/1:7.4p1-8
>>
>> Please go ahead and let us know once it is uploaded + built.
>
>
On 12/03/17 12:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2017-03-12):
>> On 12/03/17 10:47, Martin Pitt wrote:
>>> The current systemd in unstable (232-19) fixes a bunch of bugs, mostly in
>>> resolved (which we don't enable by defaul
On 12/03/17 10:47, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello release team,
>
> The current systemd in unstable (232-19) fixes a bunch of bugs, mostly in
> resolved (which we don't enable by default), but also in
On 10/03/17 17:21, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2017-03-10):
>> New xserver point release, with some minor security fixes:
>>
>> # 20170306
>> unblock xorg-server/2:1.19.2-1
>> # : Confirm with d
Hi Cyril, here's another one.
New xserver point release, with some minor security fixes:
# 20170306
unblock xorg-server/2:1.19.2-1
# : Confirm with d-i RM
#unblock-udeb xorg-server/2:1.19.2-1
age-days 5 xorg-server/2:1.19.2-1
Cheers,
Emilio
On 05/03/17 11:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2017-03-05):
>> # big debdiff, but the important stuff is in pango/, the rest are
>> autogenerated
>> # docs and the windows build bits moving from build/win32/ to win32/
>&g
On 14/02/17 03:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
A few more ;)
# 20170301
unblock nbd/1:3.15.2-1
# : Confirm with d-i RM
#unblock-udeb nbd/1:3.15.2-1
age-days 5 nbd/1:3.15.2-1
# big debdiff, but the important stuff is in pango/, the rest are autogenerated
# docs and the windows build bits
On 28/02/17 08:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cyril Brulebois (2017-02-02):
>> Source: debian-installer
>> Version: 20160516
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: l10n
>>
>> (debian-l10n-kor...@lists.debian.org in X-Debbugs-Cc for informational
>> purposes; maybe someone there
On 22/02/17 00:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2017-02-22):
>> #854616 scdaemonscdaemon cannot access yubikey using ccid
>> driver without pcscd
>
> Not sure it's d-i related?
ftr: as said on irc, that's from
On 14/02/17 10:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 14/02/17 03:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Emilio asked me on IRC to have a look at a bunch of packages which both
>> have block-udeb and RC bug fixes. Here's a list with comments, I'm OK
>> with unb
On 14/02/17 03:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Emilio asked me on IRC to have a look at a bunch of packages which both
> have block-udeb and RC bug fixes. Here's a list with comments, I'm OK
> with unblock-udeb'ing most of them (which doesn't mean you shouldn't
> review as usual for the
On 13/02/17 21:37, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-02-13 18:01:34 [+0100], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 04/02/17 15:20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Us
On 04/02/17 15:20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> Severity: normal
>
> Please unblock package openssl. It contains a redo of the rules file
> among other packaging related changes which did not
On 10/02/17 17:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Paul Schlüter (2017-02-10):
>> * The touchpad behaves strange: I can move the mouse pointer but cannot
>> click. However, this may be a hardware problem.
>
> We've had several such reports but bug triaging still needs to happen… :/
On 12/02/17 22:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2017-02-12):
>> On 12/02/17 18:08, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>&g
On 12/02/17 18:08, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi Release Team,
>
> Please unblock ntfs-3g 2016.2.22AR.1-4 as it fixes CVE-2017-0358.
> The debdiff is attached for your convenience.
On 08/02/17 17:44, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:34:09PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>
>> This seems fine to me, unblocked. Cc'ing debian-boot@/Cyril for the udeb
>> unblock.
>>
>
> Hi, I've since found a regression that I would lik
On 01/02/17 04:48, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package e2fsprogs
>
> 1.43.4 is the new upstream version of e2fsprogs which fixes a RC bug
> (#840733: e2fsprogs
On 20/10/16 13:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2016-10-20):
>>> Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare
>>> a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming
>>> hours
On 19/10/16 15:33, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare
> a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming
> hours or days, and try to figure out what to do with packages sitting
> in unstable for the time
On 20/05/16 19:46, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Release team: since that's a binNMU, the source is already in
> testing, so no action needed AFAICT?
Right.
Cheers,
Emilio
On 02/03/16 12:46, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer., 2016-02-03 at 14:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> [Context: packages shipping /bin with “funny” permissions, seen in stable.]
>>
>> Yves-Alexis Perez (2016-02-03):
>>>
>>> On mar., 2016-02-02 at 17:16 +0100, Cyril
On 17/12/15 18:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2015-12-13):
>> We're getting close to start the Perl transition. I guess there are packages
>> in
>> there building udebs, and I guess the transition won't be over by the w
On 16/12/15 00:32, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 16/12/15 00:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2015-12-16):
>>> On 15/12/15 23:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>
On 15/12/15 23:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> glibc 2.21-4 has now been for 5 days in unstable, with no RC bug no
> major error reported. It doesn't differ a lot from version 2.21-2
On 16/12/15 00:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2015-12-16):
>> On 15/12/15 23:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>
On 13/12/15 21:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not entirely sure I'll manage to get that to work but I'd like to
> consider performing a last d-i release for 2015. I haven't been paying
> attention closely enough over the past few days but if things are in shape
> somewhat, and if image
On 23/10/15 23:51, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Release team, please hint it into testing:
>
> urgent debian-installer/20151023
Done.
Cheers,
Emilio
On 17/04/15 13:51, Martin Pitt wrote:
BTW, 215-16 still didn't hit testing, so I didn't upload -17 yet. I'll
do as soon as it migrates.
systemd| 215-16 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, armel,
armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
systemd| 215-16 |
On 09/09/14 17:51, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Discussion about trying to make desktops fit on 1 CD. XFCE and LXDE
both fit on 1 CD, Gnome and KDE basically don't fit any more. We
need to work out what to do there.
Should we still build Gnome or KDE CDs at all? Not clear. Let's have
the
On 10/08/14 16:39, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org (2014-08-10):
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libgcrypt20.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed pending
On 09/08/14 15:48, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
It looks like ttf-indic-fonts was split over a year ago, but the old
source (and the old binaries) haven't been removed because the cruft
report didn't notice this. I just noticed it because of the release-team
auto-transition tracker.
All the
On 08/08/14 00:29, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014, Jordi Mallach wrote:
Well, it's roughly that time. :) So I'd like to plainly request GNOME
is reinstated as the default desktop environment for a number of
reasons.
One of the reasons put forward for switching to Xfce was size on
On 06/07/14 22:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org (2014-07-05):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/xserver1.16.html
On 09/10/13 10:29, Per Olofsson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 23:54 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Both recommends are there for a reason. gnome-bluetooth relies heavily
on gnome-control-center when you try to pair / manage devices and
network-manager-applet relies on gnome-bluetooth for
On 07/10/13 19:38, Joey Hess wrote:
network-manager-gnome recommnds gnome-bluetooth recommends
gnome-control-center recommends gnome-session
Not sure what to do about this. gnome-bluetooth seems to have
that recommends because its control panel was moved into
gnome-control-center and is
Version: 1.32.5-5+b1
On 01/06/13 17:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 25/05/13 03:31, Michael Biebl wrote:
After talking to pango/harfbuzz upstream, he recommended to build
harfbuzz without ICU support. This will get us rid of the libgcc1,
libicu48 and libstdc++ dependency.
That's all
On 25/05/13 03:31, Michael Biebl wrote:
For completeness sake:
Am 25.05.2013 02:54, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
(echo-ing what was discussed on IRC in to the BTS.)
this udeb is currently uninstallable, breaking the netboot-gtk d-i
build:
libpango1.0-udeb:amd64 Depends on libharfbuzz0 [ amd64
On 19/03/10 15:32, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(I failed to include pkg-gnome in my first mail, I've bounced it
anyway; adding them for real now. Adding pkg-sdl as well.)
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl (19/03/2010):
| libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb
This package should be dropped now. Hasn't that been
Hi,
glib2.0 has been in unstable for 41 days, according to [1]
Could it be unblocked so that it migrates to testing?
Thanks,
Emilio
[1] http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=glib2.0
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
Josselin Mouette wrote:
* serpentine: we set it as the default application to burn audio
CDs.
[in gnome-desktop task]
* gnomebaker: its functionality is mostly covered by having both
nautilus-cd-burner and serpentine.
Ok, if this combo is best
58 matches
Mail list logo